PTI News, Updates and Discussion

[Forsvaret]

A cult is defined as "obsessive, especially faddish, devotion to or veneration for a person, principle, or thing".

This definition fits IK and his followers here PERFECTLY.

A Bughz is defined as "obsessive, especially faddish, dislike to or hatred for a person, principle, or thing"

This definition fits @VCheng and his likeminded followers (such as @Meengla) here PERFECTLY.

 

[VCheng]

or pti goons did it , so they can pull victim card .

Entirely possible, especially these days. If there is such a connection, I am sure the UK authorities will find it out too.

 

[VCheng]

Dont get it. Why would it be on top of a hit list bro? Hes out of the way - in the UK. Someones clearly got it in for him. Hope the catch the retard

It would be better to wait for the UK authorities to complete their investigation into the attack. They tend to take such things quite seriously, and I would urge trusting that process.

 

[Forsvaret]

Entirely possible…

So now you don’t even need any UK police investigation, evidence or proof before claiming such a possibility — because it totally fits your Bughz-e-Imran dogma? :

A Bughz is defined as "obsessive, especially faddish, dislike to or hatred for a person, principle, or thing"

 

[Forsvaret]

View attachment 167547

 

[Respect4Respect]

This definition fits @VCheng

I don’t like calling people hypocrites but this guy makes it impossible not to. He admitted in another thread that Asim Munir is a traitor but he still supports the same mandate thieves. By that logic if Shakil Afridi took power by force then he’d have no problem backing him either.

 

[VCheng]

he still supports the same mandate thieves.

^LIE.

I do not support the illegal and supra-Constitutional power grabbing by the military. Never have, not now, and not ever.

In fact, I was the one speaking out against the military when just about everyone here was giddy when the military were manipulating IK's rise to power.

Those who were happy at the abuse of power then when it helped IK, but now are against it when IK has been destroyed by them, are the hypocritical ones here.

 

[Mobius]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Forsvaret]

I do not support the illegal and supra-Constitutional power grabbing by the military. Never have, not now, and not ever.

Then WHO or WHAT exactly is stopping you from calling them out NOW? What’s even the point of making it look like it was Imran Khan’s "fault" that military establishment supported him back then between 2018 and 2022? Or that Imran Khan is to be "blamed" for him challenging the military establishment’s unchecked power in the first place? :

So a stubborn, naive, flawed human with clear intentions is now bearing the consequences of his actions.

 

[Goenitz]

It is so stupid to do such a thing. I think RAW has no role in it nor any self-injury as it serves no purpose. I think the protest in front of Pak embassy or some news has made GHQ mad. That is why Naqvi was dispatched for Shahzad and Adil extradition. I said mad because Pak has stated that a woman is conspiring to assassinate Asim in the UK. All in all, it seems Col sab is under pressure to intimidate these two.

 

[Jango]

Yes, and PTI diehards seem to have already decided who perpetrated this crime of violence, have they not? Quite prematurely and irrationally, I might add, which is what I am pointing out above.

Whenever a crime is committed, or an event happens, there's always some suspects you narrow yourself down to, based on circumstantial evidence, preceding events, and motive.

And then you eliminate them if evidence points to someone else.

If the government can send a demarche to an ambassador against a woman who says "Zia Ul Haq plane crash main mara tha, yeh shayed car crash main mar jaye", then suspecting the people who have sent out a warrant for you and failed isn't out of the realm of possibility.

What's so hard to comprehend here? I am genuinely confused since the past few days as to your line of questioning.

 

[VCheng]

Whenever a crime is committed, or an event happens, there's always some suspects you narrow yourself down to, based on circumstantial evidence, preceding events, and motive.

Such as what exactly? He has given many speeches. He was attacked. Is there a connection between the two? What motive can be ascribed to an as-yet-unknown perpetrator?

I am genuinely confused since the past few days as to your line of questioning.

I am not questioning anything except the rush to judgment which is premature given that UK authorities have not yet completed their investigation.

 

[GoshtWalaPulao]

View attachment 167548

this guy has no shame he probably has murals set up for maryam and nawaz

 

[Jango]

Such as what exactly? He has given many speeches. He was attacked. Is there a connection between the two? What motive can be ascribed to an as-yet-unknown perpetrator?

You just have to pick a newspaper or do a Google search of what our government has been doing to Shahzad Akbar. Wouldn't take too long, I promise.

I am not questioning anything except the rush to judgment which is premature given that UK authorities have not yet completed their investigation.

There is no judgement, just the usual suspects. Indeed the investigation might tell us more, but not holding my breath.

 

[VCheng]

There is no judgement, just the usual suspects. Indeed the investigation might tell us more, but not holding my breath.

All I am suggesting is not to judge until the results of the investigation are known. I would trust UK LEOs to do their job in this matter given the high-profile nature of the victim. That is all.