Sir, I told you that there is more to this intervention then what it seems to be on the surface of it. If this article is correct then Trump admin have done its homework.
I understand your point of view. I understand that Venezuela is a dangerous environment where different mafias exist and it might be important to navigate this environment carefully. However, the US have direct access to Venezuela. Trump's playbook is also different for Venezuela, the first of its kind based on surgical operations in different countries and lessons drawn from them. Trump admin initially dispatched the CIA to Venezuela to figure out how Maduro regime works and how to exploit it. Trump admin also ordered a military buildup near Venezuela to strike at Maduro regime if need be. However, the US struck Maduro regime in such a way that the Maduro regime is separated from Maduro himself and his successor is said to be plaint. The CIA have done a splendid job there.
The US does not have direct access to Afghanistan. The US could access Afghanistan via Pakistan and had to respect Pakistan's interests in the process. The Taliban had a broader support base back then and Pakistan cautioned the US to find a way forward with it. The US also employed a less surgical strategy for war in Afghanistan. The dynamics of war in Afghanistan could change if Operation Anaconda in 2002 had led to capture of Osama Bin Laden (OBL) but this opportunity was missed. The Al-Qaeda Network would have chosen a successor but OBL might have provided valuable information in captivity which could be used to dismantle the Al-Qaeda Network at a faster pace in the region. You might want to check what Senator Kerry had to say on this matter. The war in Afghanistan prolonged because it took many years to discover hideouts of the Al-Qaeda Network's most wanted individuals in the region and nab (or eliminate) them. The Taliban were willing to negotiate with the US early on but were ignored by Bush admin. When Trump took charge, the US and the Taliban reached an understanding. The Taliban agreed to not support the Al-Qaeda Network in exchange for the US to allow it to rule Afghanistan. Both sides found a way forward in mutually acceptable manner.
The Taliban are rather exposed in the present as Pakistan have tensions with the Taliban regime. Now might be the best time to strike at the Taliban but it remains to be seen how Pakistan will address this matter and Trump admin will bite or not. The US does not seem to have a problem with Afghanistan in the present.
The Al-Qaeda Network were brainwashed crooks but many people in different countries are not insane and have livelihood concerns. Many people in different countries don't want to experience war, particularly with the strongest country in the world. If Venezuelan forces were up against a neighboring threat then the average joe in Venezuela be like
"Right, WE can handle this shit." But when it is the US then the average joe in Venezuela be like
"Dang, what are my options?." Modern warfare continues to evolve and change in time due to ongoing innovation in technology and development of new tactics based on prior operational experiences. A different region also presents a different set of challenges to deal with. I am sure that you understand these fundamentals well enough.
I respect your professional experience and understand that many readers can learn a lot from you. Nevertheless, I am a sharp observer and my conventional judgement can be spot on.
Refer to this. Let's see.