a) Does it mean the destruction of the state of Israel for a Palestinian (Muslim majority/Islamic) state, from the river to the sea?
b) Does it mean a binational secular state where Muslims, Christians and Jews can coexist equally?
c) 2-state solution along pre-1967 lines, where Israel gets about 78% of historic Palestine, and Palestinians get 22% (which includes Gaza, all of West Bank without settlements, and East Jerusalem).
- Option “a” is what the likes of Hamas, PIJ want. There has been speculation they may be open to option “c”, but they are primarily going for option “a”. They are looking to military destroy Israel.
————————————————————
- Then we have the likes of Peter Beinart, who I consider very Pro-Palestinian, who initially rooted for option “c”, but are now going for option “b”.
Peter Beinart is very anti-Hamas, but also anti-Palestinian Authority; against Israel’s apartheid and genocidal regime as well. He however believes in non-violence to achieve his aims, aiming for international pressure on Israel.
Marwan Barghouti is also someone who is very popular amongst Palestinians, he however has not advocated for the destruction of Israel, but for the creation of a free Palestinian state.
There are criticisms of Hamas and other factions, that their actions are prolonging the suffering and misery of Palestinians; as their actions have compounded the misery of Gazans in light of the Israeli genocidal onslaught.
There are also question marks about their inception, when Netanyahu funded them to undermine the national Palestinian movement.
—————————————————
However, there is no doubt that Hamas, PIJ and other groups are genuine Palestinian factions, however, there can be questions about their strategy.
Some considered them as the Malcolm X of the time, whereas the likes of others who advocate non-violence as the MLK and Mandela.
So who should Palestinians and pro-Palestinians support?