Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

I think there are many rungs on the escalation ladder before the nukes are truly in play, and Pakistan demonstrated sufficient edge in conventional warfare
I am sure that there are many levels before nuclear comes in play and hopefully we never reach the last rung of that ladder.

I have one doubt though.

It is being claimed by majority of the Pak posters that Pakistan chose not to use even partial force of its conventional capabilities. They also believe that India panicked and used Brahmos while Munir didn’t use any of the similar missiles in ample with Pak forces. Why would India panic? Whatever loss of fighters happened was on the 7th. What happened later that no one has been able to bring out but was devastating for India?

All this with the premise, that Pakistan was displaying restraint all through while there were visible attacks across many Pak assets. In hindsight, it can be claimed that damage was not much in terms of losses, but at that time it wouldn’t have been known since it was a hot situation. Even then it was decided to let go?

Then, it is also well known that NCA meeting was called by Munir to signal nuclear angle. NCA approval or deliberations are not required for anything conventional. GHQ has full authority over conventional responses.

Why would nuclear signalling be used without using even the lowest rungs of conventional capabilities?

Was it because of reach and accuracy of Indian attack on 10th rattled the cage? Not in terms of total damage caused (as seen in hindsight) but in terms of number of places attacked accurately with relatively low number of precision weapons fired. Probably, it was realised that the conventional arms didn’t really have the capability as being claimed by many. Otherwise there is no other plausible explanation.

Not likely to be a very popular observation but definitely one that needs a rethink by quite a few here.
 
Last edited:
I am sure that there are many levels before nuclear comes in play and hopefully we never reach the last rung of that ladder.

I have one doubt though.

It is being claimed by majority of the Pak posters that Pakistan chose not to use even partial force of its conventional capabilities. They also believe that India panicked and used Brahmos while Munir didn’t use any of the similar missiles in ample with Pak forces. All this with the premise, that Pakistan was displaying restraint all through while there were visible attacks across many Pak assets. In hindsight, it can be claimed that damage was not much in terms of losses, but at that time it wouldn’t have been known since it was a hot situation. Even then it was decided to let go?

Then, there is also well known that NCA meeting was called by Munir to signal nuclear angle. NCA approval or deliberations are not required for anything conventional. GHQ has full authority over conventional responses.

Why would nuclear signalling be used without using even the lowest rungs of conventional capabilities?

Was it because of reach and accuracy of Indian attack on 10th rattled the cage? Not in terms of total damage caused (as seen in hindsight) but in terms of number of places attacked accurately with relatively low number of precision weapons fired. Probably, it was realised that the conventional arms didn’t really have the capability as being claimed by many. Otherwise there is no other plausible explanation.

Not likely to be a very popular observation but definitely one that needs a rethink by quite a few here.
Pakistan's posture was firmly defensive, this is internally criticized nonetheless it was defensive. India's was offensive, which is why it went from counterterrorism to conventional military war, because India escalated

Therefore Pakistan can only defend against the incoming attack and respond accordingly, that was the pattern for a few days, this is not to restraint but the chosen posture. Since India agreed to a ceasefire after the alleged successes we can only presume that India only wanted to make a point they could sell internally, they could have waited for Pakistan's response

Nuclear signaling is altogether different , Pakistan being the smaller country will utilise nukes in various ways to create beneficial leverage, this also includes third parties. Russia has also done plenty of nuclear signaling.

You have to remember that you are meant to be the bigger country so you are meant to control the escalation ladder, including when anything can start or end. Now with your missile success, it sounds even more bizarre that you agreed to a ceasefire abruptly, because all that has done going forward is allowed Pakistan to work on more effective defense and offense..... With friends like China and Turkey.

So what you considered your biggest victory is something transient potentially, you did not press home anything decisive when it seems like you could have. So why didn't you
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Chanakya himself could not come out with this confused nonsense

Is this actually a military general



post retirement bens. and earnings secured for the remaining of his life tenure!

One has to wonder, why would any one would not want to be a gov. officer in Ind!
 
I am sure that there are many levels before nuclear comes in play and hopefully we never reach the last rung of that ladder.

I have one doubt though.

It is being claimed by majority of the Pak posters that Pakistan chose not to use even partial force of its conventional capabilities. They also believe that India panicked and used Brahmos while Munir didn’t use any of the similar missiles in ample with Pak forces. Why would India panic? Whatever loss of fighters happened was on the 7th. What happened later that no one has been able to bring out but was devastating for India?

All this with the premise, that Pakistan was displaying restraint all through while there were visible attacks across many Pak assets. In hindsight, it can be claimed that damage was not much in terms of losses, but at that time it wouldn’t have been known since it was a hot situation. Even then it was decided to let go?

Then, it is also well known that NCA meeting was called by Munir to signal nuclear angle. NCA approval or deliberations are not required for anything conventional. GHQ has full authority over conventional responses.

Why would nuclear signalling be used without using even the lowest rungs of conventional capabilities?

Was it because of reach and accuracy of Indian attack on 10th rattled the cage? Not in terms of total damage caused (as seen in hindsight) but in terms of number of places attacked accurately with relatively low number of precision weapons fired. Probably, it was realised that the conventional arms didn’t really have the capability as being claimed by many. Otherwise there is no other plausible explanation.

Not likely to be a very popular observation but definitely one that needs a rethink by quite a few here.


BS!

Nuclear posturing was for your armor columns which were ready to make their way into Sindh, by May 10th morning
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Chanakya himself could not come out with this confused nonsense

Is this actually a military general

He is doing good. At one time he is warning about the danger while also satisfying their ego.
you can start a war but cannot end it
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Chanakya himself could not come out with this confused nonsense

Is this actually a military general

Ratta mar ke stage pe agya hai lol
 
Since India agreed to a ceasefire after the alleged successes
May 25 was not about any military victory or destruction but display of intent and testing the limits of the nuclear deterrence. India indicated that it would not hesitate to cross again (like 2019), nuclear or no nuclear.

It was foolish to assume that you attack a country with professional defence forces and then say - Ok ok. Let’s be good now. That was as stupid as it could get. Must be a brain fade moment when this was thought out, that too with 2019 precedence as an evidence, that it would fail. Rafale gave them overconfidence. Poor trait for military leaders.

However, stupid or smart they were, they definitely didn’t want a full fledged war. Because that can go south in many ways.

You have to remember that you are meant to be the bigger country so you are meant to control the escalation ladder, including when anything can start or end.

I disagree with this. One can control a start but end is not in any body’s hand. Even on the 10th May, had Pakistan said that they too want some satellite pictures before a ceasefire, then it could have gone into something big. One can control the firing of the first bullet. Nothing after that.

So why didn't you
Because my stupid people were expecting that they would do a precise attack and not allow it to escalate any further. There was no appetite for a full war. Didn’t turn out as they had expected and they had to go upto Brahmos, Scalp etc when it cooled down.

Had the premise been any more, the initial attack would have been more military in nature. However, it was more of a symbolic one against non-military targets.

They still offered a ceasefire after 7th May after initial strike. Ok, ok, let’s calm down was conveyed but turned down by Munir and “time and place of own choosing” was conveyed.

My point is that, this “time and place of choosing” wasn’t as stellar as it was assumed and as it is claimed by majority of Pak posters. BuM didn’t really produce the kind of results that got Munir one extra star.

Had a ceasefire been accepted on the 7th, imagine the Indian situation. Lost four fighters and attacked 11 terrorists targets. Worst possible optics.

Munir allowed Indian side to redeem a little by giving a chance to attack on 10th and getting huge narrative points. Those satellite images aren’t going anywhere, any time soon.

While Munir didn’t gain anything other than “I am telling you bro” kind of results. Very few people are asking - Kiya kya aapne during “place and time of own choosing”.
 
Last edited:
Apni kahani apni zubani......it should be the title of new thread....and contents would be like:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Apni kahani apni zubani......it should be the title of new thread....and contents would be like:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Include all the claims by IAF chief too
 
May 25 was not about any military victory or destruction but display of intent and testing the limits of the nuclear deterrence. India indicated that it would not hesitate to cross again (like 2019), nuclear or no nuclear.

It was foolish to assume that you attack a country with professional defence forces and then say - Ok ok. Let’s be good now. That was as stupid as it could get. Must be a brain fade moment when this was thought out, that too with 2019 precedence as an evidence, that it would fail. Rafale gave them overconfidence. Poor trait for military leaders.

That is what it became, around nuclear bluff, but we cannot make things up as we please, may 6th India felt that they could use the rafels and attack Pakistan at will.

Just apply a simple thought experiment, imagine that you had not incurred losses, what would your narrative be then?

Following the proper timeline of events, the Rafale was believed to be in excess of anything Pakistan could manage, this is why a few of these going down is not just a psychological blow, it represents at least a partial doctrine failure, saying that called a nuclear bluff, absent of war, is pointless

However, stupid or smart they were, they definitely didn’t want a full fledged war. Because that can go south in many ways

This idea that you can have limited wars is again some type of doctrine failure, because then the only way this makes sense is if you pull this off with more success than not, so you have two examples where this failed, the second one happened because the Rafael was meant to be too much and the difference between your first previous attempt where you lost the MIG

So what are we left with, India insisting they have a right to attack Pakistan, incur high profile losses in succession, but they don't want war, yet they are much bigger and stronger.



disagree with this. One can control a start but end is not in any body’s hand. Even on the 10th May, had Pakistan said that they too want some satellite pictures before a ceasefire, then it could have gone into something big. One can control the firing of the first bullet. Nothing after that.
Yes, and again I'm wondering why that is worrisome for India
Because my stupid people were expecting that they would do a precise attack and not allow it to escalate any further. There was no appetite for a full war. Didn’t turn out as they had expected and they had to go upto Brahmos, Scalp etc when it cooled down.

Had the premise been any more, the initial attack would have been more military in nature. However, it was more of a symbolic one against non-military targets.

They still offered a ceasefire after 7th May after initial strike. Ok, ok, let’s calm down was conveyed but turned down by Munir and “time and place of own choosing” was conveyed.

My point is that, this “time and place of choosing” wasn’t as stellar as it was assumed and as it is claimed by majority of Pak posters. BuM didn’t really produce the kind of results that got Munir one extra star.

Had a ceasefire been accepted on the 7th, imagine the Indian situation. Lost four fighters and attacked 11 terrorists targets. Worst possible optics.


Again we cannot rewrite the timeline, at the time the initial strikes were meant to be counter terrorism, you go in make a point and out. It did not turn out like that, so then it escalated, but then you don't want escalation, okay then why do you start this to begin with
The nuclear angle only came in because the initial counterterrorism operation failed, therefore you have to change the narrative, but again it's ridiculous to go from where you started to where you end up, your narrative had to escalate many rungs to compensate for the lack of decisiveness in your conventional attack.

This doesn't even serve the message you think it does, because it has alerted Pakistan and china to fix shortcomings, that's not a signal of anything unless you prolong the war and actually credibly make it count, instead it's a heads up on how to defend against India's nuclear narrative against Pakistan.

This again has to be a strategic blunder, unless you believe the nukes were taken out and Lahore port also was taken out, ok so what, more missiles more Air defense incoming
 
Jokes aside.. a nuclear war with India in the very near future is likely, as India has drawn the wrong lessons from Operation Sindoor.
India believes it can initiate and win a nuclear war with Pakistan.

it wouldn't really be a bad thing, people are fed up of being poor, lack of healthcare, lack of jobs, high inflation, unable to pay food/shelter/electricity bills, etc. I know even our families back in Pakistan are struggling and are sick and tired of the status quo system of these 'kanjar bastard elites' ruling over them with iron fist. They will welcome a full war even if for the excitement/something to do/watch
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top