Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

hussain0216 said:
It's not just attack and defence

Let's for example say, the U.S carriers camp themselves 500km-700km off the coast of Iran

Probably far enough away to be out of range of most Iranian anti ship missiles

And the U.S and Iran fire missiles at each other or U.S starts military action


The U.S is shutting down the economies of multiple states as well shutting down oil and gas supply out of the region, as well as major effect on air travel

India for example is completely blocked going west, as well as most of the gulf states air travel



All for what? Israel?
Click to expand...
Jews run USA. America is top Goy for nation that hates Jesus lol
 
Persian Gulf said:
USA is likely to impose a blockade on Iran, like Venezuela, then wait for the right time to kill senior leaders
Click to expand...
If US blockages Iran, then Iran will blockade GCC maritime trade and oil shipments within the Persian Gulf. US wont be able to only limit Iranian maritime activities in the gulf region.

TRUMP IS GETTING COLD FEET for this pending attack -he has hyped and puffed up tje USN and military, so he must do something big now and win or risks US looking like a paper tiger, which it is when its serous war time, ask Afghanistan.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



"The UAE is the regional expert in currency manipulation. It has engaged in economic warfare against Turkey, Qatar and Iran as part of regime change operations. The UAE was caught in the act using Banque Havilland to crash the Qatari rial in 2017 as part of its blockade on Qatar.

The UAE sent its army of state-paid Zionist influencers out last week to crow that Iran was about to fall to Reza Pahlavi. Now that it's time for payback for Emirati involvement in the operation against Iran and in the Gaza genocide, they're trying desperately to walk it all back.

Hideous Tower of Babel you've got there. Real shame if something were to happen to it."
 
925boy said:
If US blockages Iran, then Iran will blockade GCC maritime trade and oil shipments within the Persian Gulf. US wont be able to only limit Iranian maritime activities in the gulf region.

TRUMP IS GETTING COLD FEET for this pending attack -he has hyped and puffed up tje USN and military, so he must do something big now and win or risks US looking like a paper tiger, which it is when its serous war time, ask Afghanistan.
Click to expand...
Underestimating the President is never a good idea.

Has June 22nd, 2025 already faded from your memory?
 
S
Hassan Al-Somal said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



"The UAE is the regional expert in currency manipulation. It has engaged in economic warfare against Turkey, Qatar and Iran as part of regime change operations. The UAE was caught in the act using Banque Havilland to crash the Qatari rial in 2017 as part of its blockade on Qatar.

The UAE sent its army of state-paid Zionist influencers out last week to crow that Iran was about to fall to Reza Pahlavi. Now that it's time for payback for Emirati involvement in the operation against Iran and in the Gaza genocide, they're trying desperately to walk it all back.

Hideous Tower of Babel you've got there. Real shame if something were to happen to it.
Click to expand...


So would you prefer if they said they would support potential strikes on Iran? I really dont understand this beahviour. Shouldn't you be encouraging a regional rival who is refusing to participate in an attack on you?
 
Beast89 said:
Jews run USA. America is top Goy for nation that hates Jesus lol
Click to expand...

Evangelical Christian has been very supportive to Israel due to some of bible verse as well. And white American is basically Evangelical Christian followers. Even European with more mixed Christian steams still show support on Israel.
 
Iranian Advisor to Former Commander Confirms The "U.S. Asked Iran to Go Easy" Story

He said Israel and the U.S. sent Iran Messages: Both were rejected.

Take this with a BIG grain of salt, but if you add up all the stories from Israeli, Iranian, and Arab Media, it adds up to something close to this.

Mostafa Najafi:

"In the past two weeks, two important messages were sent to Iran, both of which were rejected by Iran.

One was from the US and the other from Israel. Washington's message to Tehran was that a limited attack would be carried out, and that it must be accepted or face only a symbolic response. Tehran, while rejecting this request, announced that it has redefined its war rules and red lines and considers any attack as a full-scale war.

Israel's message to one of the intermediaries was that it would not participate in the US attack, and Iran was asked not to target Israel. This request was also met with a negative response from Iran, which explicitly stated that with the start of US military action, Israel would be attacked. Netanyahu's recent threats are in this context.

At the same time, Iran sent a message to all countries in the region from Baku to Riyadh that any attack from the land or air of these countries will lead to an attack on them.

The main reason the US military canceled its attack on Tuesday night last week was this. Therefore, the operation was postponed to pursue three goals by deploying a large volume of offensive and defensive military equipment to the region: deterrence, containment of Iran's response, and preparation for an escalation scenario.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Hassan Al-Somal said:
Iranian Advisor to Former Commander Confirms The "U.S. Asked Iran to Go Easy" Story

He said Israel and the U.S. sent Iran Messages: Both were rejected.

Take this with a BIG grain of salt, but if you add up all the stories from Israeli, Iranian, and Arab Media, it adds up to something close to this.

Mostafa Najafi:

"In the past two weeks, two important messages were sent to Iran, both of which were rejected by Iran.

One was from the US and the other from Israel. Washington's message to Tehran was that a limited attack would be carried out, and that it must be accepted or face only a symbolic response. Tehran, while rejecting this request, announced that it has redefined its war rules and red lines and considers any attack as a full-scale war.

Israel's message to one of the intermediaries was that it would not participate in the US attack, and Iran was asked not to target Israel. This request was also met with a negative response from Iran, which explicitly stated that with the start of US military action, Israel would be attacked. Netanyahu's recent threats are in this context.

At the same time, Iran sent a message to all countries in the region from Baku to Riyadh that any attack from the land or air of these countries will lead to an attack on them.

The main reason the US military canceled its attack on Tuesday night last week was this. Therefore, the operation was postponed to pursue three goals by deploying a large volume of offensive and defensive military equipment to the region: deterrence, containment of Iran's response, and preparation for an escalation scenario.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Wow I can't believe Iran regime are being such jerks. US is asking nicely to please don't respond harshly after US does a decapitation strike and a strike on their missile capabilities, what happen to Iran's civility? This world has really gone downhill how can Iran reject such a nice ask?
 
Hassan Al-Somal said:
Iranian Advisor to Former Commander Confirms The "U.S. Asked Iran to Go Easy" Story

He said Israel and the U.S. sent Iran Messages: Both were rejected.

Take this with a BIG grain of salt, but if you add up all the stories from Israeli, Iranian, and Arab Media, it adds up to something close to this.

Mostafa Najafi:

"In the past two weeks, two important messages were sent to Iran, both of which were rejected by Iran.

One was from the US and the other from Israel. Washington's message to Tehran was that a limited attack would be carried out, and that it must be accepted or face only a symbolic response. Tehran, while rejecting this request, announced that it has redefined its war rules and red lines and considers any attack as a full-scale war.

Israel's message to one of the intermediaries was that it would not participate in the US attack, and Iran was asked not to target Israel. This request was also met with a negative response from Iran, which explicitly stated that with the start of US military action, Israel would be attacked. Netanyahu's recent threats are in this context.

At the same time, Iran sent a message to all countries in the region from Baku to Riyadh that any attack from the land or air of these countries will lead to an attack on them.

The main reason the US military canceled its attack on Tuesday night last week was this. Therefore, the operation was postponed to pursue three goals by deploying a large volume of offensive and defensive military equipment to the region: deterrence, containment of Iran's response, and preparation for an escalation scenario.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Normal countries won't accept such a violation of their sovereignty, so Iran's enemies are getting bolder thinking they can get pot-shots on Iran then run away before getting punched back. Then repeat the same, and then again, keeping Iran bruised and unable to punch back.

So it is very wise for Iran to restore deterrence by claiming any attack would be an all-out war no matter how limited. Trump has already ordered an attack on Iran 2 times already, one Soleimani and one Midnight Hammer, so Iran would be seen as a complete chicken if not go to war with USA for the 3rd time they make a limited strike, which they will repeat for the 4th and 5th unless Iran says enough is enough, screw this and let' fight like a man till death.
 
Serendipity said:
S


So would you prefer if they said they would support potential strikes on Iran? I really dont understand this beahviour. Shouldn't you be encouraging a regional rival who is refusing to participate in an attack on you?
Click to expand...
Haha, it's all for show man...they're the single biggest enemy of Iran, after Israel. The UAE is a Mossad outpost.....Not to mention an outpost for the CIA as well.
 
The Zionist project must fail for the Middle East to have peace.....so must their proxies.

Saudi Arabia has refused to receive Tahnoon bin Zayed, the National Security Advisor of the United Arab Emirates.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
StrategicBear said:
Normal countries won't accept such a violation of their sovereignty, so Iran's enemies are getting bolder thinking they can get pot-shots on Iran then run away before getting punched back. Then repeat the same, and then again, keeping Iran bruised and unable to punch back.

So it is very wise for Iran to restore deterrence by claiming any attack would be an all-out war no matter how limited. Trump has already ordered an attack on Iran 2 times already, one Soleimani and one Midnight Hammer, so Iran would be seen as a complete chicken if not go to war with USA for the 3rd time they make a limited strike, which they will repeat for the 4th and 5th unless Iran says enough is enough, screw this and let' fight like a man till death.
Click to expand...

It's very likely the U.S has offered a deal

Let us kill or kidnap Khomeini (like Maduro) and you can keep your regime as long as you

Pivot your oil and economy towards the U.S, we control.your oil and reserves going forward

Don't trade with China or Russia

End your nuclear program
Limit your missile production and range



Something along those lines was probably offered to the Iranian state via different routes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 2 more.
    • Total: 169 (members: 19, guests: 150)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top