Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[SoulSpokesman]

@flyingorca

and then tried to rewrite the outcome through imagination.

They did enough to force your COAS and PM to award an orange monkey the Nobel.

Regards

 

[Broghil]

@flyingorca

and then tried to rewrite the outcome through imagination.

They did enough to force your COAS and PM to award an orange monkey the Nobel.

Regards

Still nothing matches the Award thrust upon Abhinandon for shooting down an f-16 with the missile still attached to the pylon.

 

[Master Chief]

@flyingorca

and then tried to rewrite the outcome through imagination.

They did enough to force your COAS and PM to award an orange monkey the Nobel.

Regards

Sir,

Until Indians stop jumping around like smaller less colourful monkeys the minute the big orange one mentions "8 planes" or "Kashmir", we shall continue to deploy him to serve our interests.

When Indians stop taking him as a serious threat, the deployment will no longer be useful to us.

Simple feedback loop.

 

[Vkdindian1]

A direct hit by a cruise missile weighing 100s of kilograms would completely obliterate a fighter jet—shredding the airframe, igniting fuel, and scattering debris. It would not leave an intact structure or a fighter jet -shaped outline visible from satellite imagery.

Your argument might fail here. Aircraft inside the hangar at Bholari had only minor damage, inspite of a direct hit from Brahmos at supersonic speeds.

You would need to analyse both the attacks and then prove your theory. You can’t pick and choose one attack at a time.

Best would be to claim that, there were no aircraft inside the hangar. That would sell very well.

 

[Baibers_1260]

Firing missiles at ground installations - a static target thousands of hectares wide built with redundancy - does not automatically demonstrate an operational edge.

The Ukrainians have bombarded kursk and crimea with storm-shadows, ATACMS, - VKS is still airborne.

The Russians have hit almost every Ukrainian airbase nearly round the clock with Kh-101's and Iskanders - Ukrainian air force is still airborne.

On a related note, concerning the Indian dams on the Indus Water networks ( Link to a related post in the forum here ) is it possible to use "Sea Baby " Water drones skimming upsteam to slam into the gates of the dams or would the spillway pose an obstacle.
"Sea babies" damaged the Kerch bridge and demolished the Antonovsky Kherson bridge and have been successful in taking our numerous targets in harbors and river ports,
Russia using a combination of missiles, drones, air-strikes and sabotage teams has destroyed dozens of dams including the famous Nova Khakova dam in Ukraine, . Russia also destroyed several dams on the Dnieper canal to ensure water supply to Crimea .
Has Pakistan been investing in Sea Drones?

 

[Hmmmm]

I have a new dilemma.
This photo is being circulated since Indian Republic day parade as evidence of BS002 still existing and wasn't shot by Pakistan.
But why the french Flag ? Thats not an Indian flag on it's tail.... is it ?

View attachment 175456

I have a new dilemma.
This photo is being circulated since Indian Republic day parade as evidence of BS002 still existing and wasn't shot by Pakistan.
But why the french Flag ? Thats not an Indian flag on it's tail.... is it ?

View attachment 175456

that's just the lighting making it look like that. The BS001 that was shot down also looked like it had a French flag. French Airforce Rafales don't have a French flag on their tails

 

[Baibers_1260]

I have a new dilemma.
This photo is being circulated since Indian Republic day parade as evidence of BS002 still existing and wasn't shot by Pakistan.
But why the french Flag ? Thats not an Indian flag on it's tail.... is it ?

View attachment 175456

That's an Indian flag ( pennant). Saffron , White and Green stripes, borrowed from the Indian tricolor and roundel. The colors are right to left. This is confusing because the Irish flag, is similar.

 

[flyingorca]

Your argument might fail here. Aircraft inside the hangar at Bholari had only minor damage, inspite of a direct hit from Brahmos at supersonic speeds.

You would need to analyse both the attacks and then prove your theory. You can’t pick and choose one attack at a time.

Best would be to claim that, there were no aircraft inside the hangar. That would sell very well.

Go enjoy the mental ️ materials provide by GOI in propaganda parade. Thats the source of evidence for nearly Billion mentally disturbed people.

Btw, Pakistan does not officially claim a Saab2000 was parked inside of Bhollari AB. Only one rtd PAF officer believes a Saab2000 may have been damaged.

 

[flyingorca]

@flyingorca

and then tried to rewrite the outcome through imagination.

They did enough to force your COAS and PM to award an orange monkey the Nobel.

Regards

Pakistan was never interested in a war so they welcomed India's request for ceasefire via Trump.
So what happend to India does not listens to anyone and makes their own policy/decisions? Cant believe India folded to Trumps one call if we go by Indian narritive.

 

[Vkdindian1]

Btw, Pakistan does not officially claim a Saab2000 was parked inside of Bhollari AB. Only one rtd PAF officer believes a Saab2000 may have been damaged.

Mods and Think Tanks in the forum have accepted that there was an aircraft parked inside Bholari structure hit by a Brahmos. There were detailed discussions too, with the diagram of the hangar with the possible parking location inside.

In that case, the aircraft came out unscathed, hence any assessment by you that aircraft are likely to be completely destroyed in another, exactly similar scenario might not cut it.

Hence the suggestion. It seems that you don’t like it. Please leave it and go ahead with your theory.

 

[flyingorca]

Still nothing matches the Award thrust upon Abhinandon for shooting down an f-16 with the missile still attached to the pylon.

No saar China transferred 1 R-73 missile to Pakistan. Saar we desperately needed Rafales in 2019 even though mig21 shot down F-16. Indian logic

 

[Falcon26]

No saar China transferred 1 R-73 missile to Pakistan. Saar we desperately needed Rafales in 2019 even though mig21 shot down F-16. Indian logic

They lie through their teeth and even many of them don’t accept a Rafale, a SU-30mki, MiG-29 & mirage-2000 were shot down even though the debris are littered all over India.

 

[Corax]

Mods and Think Tanks in the forum have accepted that there was an aircraft parked inside Bholari structure hit by a Brahmos. There were detailed discussions too, with the diagram of the hangar with the possible parking location inside.

In that case, the aircraft came out unscathed, hence any assessment by you that aircraft are likely to be completely destroyed in another, exactly similar scenario might not cut it.

Hence the suggestion. It seems that you don’t like it. Please leave it and go ahead with your theory.

Oh really?! This coming from the guy who repeatedly claims the moral high horse for looking objectively when it comes to Pak claims of IAF aircraft downed and targets hit in india. Since you repeatedly bark about there being evidence for only 4 IAF aircraft destroyed, why don't you use the same logic here now? Where's the evidence for 6 Vipers destroyed and an Erieye by your very owned bullshitting ACM?!

 

[Vkdindian1]

Oh really?! This coming from the guy who repeatedly claims the moral high horse for looking objectively when it comes to Pak claims of IAF aircraft downed and targets hit in india. Since you repeatedly bark about there being evidence for only 4 IAF aircraft destroyed, why don't you use the same logic here now? Where's the evidence for 6 Vipers destroyed and an Erieye by your very owned bullshitting ACM?!

Calm down cowboy. I never said that a single viper was lost in that strike. I gave a suggestion to our dear friend here to take a consistent line regarding impact of a Brahmos strike on a hangar. That’s it.

If he says that a Brahmos strike on a hangar would completely destroy anything inside may not go well since a Saab came out safe at Bholari.

 

[flyingorca]

Mods and Think Tanks in the forum have accepted that there was an aircraft parked inside Bholari structure hit by a Brahmos. There were detailed discussions too, with the diagram of the hangar with the possible parking location inside.

In that case, the aircraft came out unscathed, hence any assessment by you that aircraft are likely to be completely destroyed in another, exactly similar scenario might not cut it.

Hence the suggestion. It seems that you don’t like it. Please leave it and go ahead with your theory.

If a Saab2000 was indeed parked inside Hanger then its destroyed. Right now we can only speculate that there was indeed one. Also, if PAF Squadron leader's body was intact and not decapitated suggest that the Saab2000 was being towed out of the hanger and shrapnels may have struck both the officer and the aircraft.
Half a billion people from India believes Usman died while FLYING in a Saab2000 btw.