Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Vkdindian1]

So if Pakistanis say they did not lose any jets in hanger is a propaganda but of India claims of destroying 10 to 12 Pakistani hi tekk phiter jets is not a propaganda according to you? So convincing.

Na na.

Whatever was said by India is propaganda. No two ways about it. I was merely accepting, that India is bad at everything. Even propaganda.

In any case you have already proven beyond any doubt that there were no loses on your side.

It’s settled beyond any doubt.

 

[AliKazmi007]

take a look at this, even these guys are questioning the validity of the this "think tank" and the report by The Hindu:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Love this part of this report, that Mriages an Rafales penetrated Pak air space to lauch the presiopon ordnance! Enjoy this delulu trip!

 

[Vkdindian1]

Absolutely true …. Showing truth with the wreckage videos combined with propaganda like Shivangi in our custody made you guys have diarrhea since May

Diarrhoea, severe vomiting, palpitations, and even diseases like diabetes, TB etc have affected my folks badly after May 25.

We failed militarily and even in propaganda. How bad things can be?

 

[safriz]

The Saab2000 was towed away just in time.
View attachment 175513

Pakistan never denied a damaged AWACS.
DGISPR did mention a damaged plane and that it's repairable.

 

[Vkdindian1]

Pakistan never denied a damaged AWACS.
DGISPR did mention a damaged plane and that it's repairable.

He is just bringing out the finer details of why very less damage was caused. Because it was moved away just in time as technicians were always ready with tow trucks to meet such an eventuality.

 

[Venom]

So if Pakistanis say they did not lose any jets in hanger is a propaganda but of India claims of destroying 10 to 12 Pakistani hi tekk phiter jets is not a propaganda according to you? So convincing.

Can you even instantiate your claims how the heck you know what was inside a specific hanger or not? You can put what ever your imagination allows to - entire F16 sqdns etc. PAF stated the damage to a saab erieye through sharpnel damage from a blast. Now which brahmos strike or hanger it was nothing has been claimed - you cannot even correlate a specific strike to the so called damage you are trying to claim.

PAF has the authority to state what it has or has not lost in its inventory. IAF has no way of proving what was inside a specific building. Sat images are there but PAF stated it did not lose any high value assets in them. Its not PAFs fault that ot could not even score a single A2A kill despite 100+ jets being in air and IAF having a numbers advantage.

 

[Venom]

He is just bringing out the finer details of why very less damage was caused. Because it was moved away just in time as technicians were always ready with tow trucks to meet such an eventuality.

Where is the two away story coming from? PAF? The proof of losses cannot be just created just because they are inconvenient for your story.

 

[Liquidator]

take a look at this, even these guys are questioning the validity of the this "think tank" and the report by The Hindu:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Love this part of this report, that Mrigaes an Rafales penetrated Pak air space to lauch the presiopon ordnance! Enjoy this delulu trip!

Yup

India achieved air superiority by disappearing for 2 days.

Interesting.

It is precisely this type of arrogance that will be their downfall. I'd like you all to think back 5 years.....remember we all thought the below would be impossible:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Both in terms of Iranian CAPABILITY and Israeli CAPABILITY to defend against such missiles.

Making your enemies think you are stronger than they can imagine and you are as weak as ever is a key aspect of psychological war "domain"....however it is a double edged sword as it risks the enemies consuming their own nonsense.

 

[Vkdindian1]

The proof of losses cannot be just created just because they are inconvenient for your story.

I have no story mate. I just said yes to the story of my friend @flyingorca. Please sort it out with him.

As far as the high value asset goes, it has been accepted by mods/think tanks that there was indeed a Saab inside that structure. And the reasons for less/no damage were also explained in detail. I would take their word over your’s.

 

[flyingorca]

Pakistan never denied a damaged AWACS.
DGISPR did mention a damaged plane and that it's repairable.

Thats what the picture depicts. Not completely destroyed but damaged outside hanger while being towed away.

 

[safriz]

He is just bringing out the finer details of why very less damage was caused. Because it was moved away just in time as technicians were always ready with tow trucks to meet such an eventuality.

PAF entire doctrine is based on WWW2 doctrine of Finland and Sweden, and i wont be surprised if they actually had tow trucks on the ready for moving the aircrafts if the airbase gets hit.

 

[r3alist]

Well no one believes more than one Rafale was down during the time.

France is having own version to accept and china is having own version to propagate even USA reports said about chinese propaganda. On the claims made.

Only if someone being neutral concludes this incident- they can clearly say that both sides got exposed on different issues.

But the funny part is that both sides declared victory as always government propagate after the war, nothing new.

Best funny part was to me declaring holiday personally

Why did the report not mention what your air chief said of taking down f16s with the s400?

That should be in the report.

 

[flyingorca]

I have no story mate. I just said yes to the story of my friend @flyingorca. Please sort it out with him.

As far as the high value asset goes, it has been accepted by mods/think tanks that there was indeed a Saab inside that structure. And the reasons for less/no damage were also explained in detail. I would take their word over your’s.

I love that cute sarcasm of yours. It happens every time i debate with bollywood brianwashed Bharatis. This is their method of coping.

 

[Oracle]

So when did Indian got so mature enough?


-) Showed shivangi singh several months after Pakistan claim...
-) Showed BS022 several months after Pakistan claim....


This kind maturity is not expected from Indians to don't care about what world is saying keep on working. However currently it seems true.
IAF chief also said planes were down however not that much what Pakistan is claiming.

 

[flyingorca]

Where is the two away story coming from? PAF? The proof of losses cannot be just created just because they are inconvenient for your story.

Saaar why did you redeem it you dont have to dhoo that. Nooooooo.
So you think fighter jets move around airbase with engine power only?