The ‘myth’ of Western-style democracy is losing its appeal even in the West (China Global Times editorial)

The problem with the Western system is: only the USA can confidently run it without fear of foreign influence (except Israel).

So any countries running the Western system need to stay on the good side of the USA.
South American countries are a recent example. Even Lula escaped this time, there is another in a few years.
 
Are you fxxking kiding me?

How many high-ranking have been removed? The central military committee only has two left, including Xi.

The system is different, still pretty bad.
Most them were removed because of corruption. Not because they are incompetent. Some corrupted officals are very competent. Take an example, Liu Zhijun(刘志军), who was sent to jail for corruption but every agrees he built foundation for China's high speed railway system.

High level officials being removed is a good sign. It means the political system is healthy. I would be worried if someday no senior offical is punished in China.
 
nowadays patriotic sovereign dictatorships (China) work far better than vassal democracies (Europe).

USA is a sovereign democracy, it works well if you have a good job, it has a stable future unlike vassal democracies who go straight and fast towards the cliff.

of course if there is something worst is a vassal dictatorship like current Ukraine or 1970s Latin America op condor regimes.

GCC enjoyed good life standards, but if they keep following Iran war stupid plans, it could be the end of all them.
 
nowadays patriotic sovereign dictatorships (China) work far better than vassal democracies (Europe).

USA is a sovereign democracy, it works well if you have a good job, it has a stable future unlike vassal democracies who go straight and fast towards the cliff.

of course if there is something worst is a vassal dictatorship like current Ukraine or 1970s Latin America op condor regimes.

GCC enjoyed good life standards, but if they keep following Iran war stupid plans, it could be the end of all them.
The US political system was designed to be maximally stable in order to prevent any single group from having too much power. The Founding Fathers were actually pretty open about distrusting direct democracy and they used the word republic to distinguish what they wanted from what they called democracy (which they associated with ancient Athens and with mob rule).
 
The US political system was designed to be maximally stable in order to prevent any single group from having too much power. The Founding Fathers were actually pretty open about distrusting direct democracy and they used the word republic to distinguish what they wanted from what they called democracy (which they associated with ancient Athens and with mob rule).
The US is a special case, can't be used to vouch for this system.

Remember, the USA used to have no standing army. It gave anyone 50 acres, as long as you reached the Wild West.

Even today, with modern tech, hardly anything except an ICBM can touch the USA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top