I am being a bit semantic here but I don't like this whole "Gulf countries" terminology. We are Arabian/Arab countries on the Arabian Peninsula. West Asia. Middle East. That is the GCC countries. Iraq is technically a Gulf country too by that logic, often included as well. Even most of Southern Iraq is geographically part of the Arabian Peninsula. By that logic Iran itself is an "Gulf country" too.
I never heard talk about an "Arabian Sea" or "Gulf of Oman" etc. country.
"Gulf countries" in Eastern Arabia (Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Oman) should be called Eastern Arabian countries.
The correct description is Eastern Arabian countries and this goes for South Iraq to Northern Oman only.
en.wikipedia.org
Basically from ancient Sumer (Southern Iraq and Kuwait/Northeastern KSA) to Magan (Northern Oman).
In particular KSA, which is the size of Western Europe and Greenland (12th largest country in the world and the largest in West Asia by some margin) and which really is not a "Gulf country" anymore than it is a "Red Sea" country, "South Arabia" country, "West Arabia" country, "East Arabia" country, "Central Arabia" country or "North Arabia" country etc.
Only a small part of KSA borders the Gulf and less than 5% of our population speaks a Khaliji Arabic dialect.
en.wikipedia.org
Most Saudi Arabians are far closer to the Levant, Egypt, Yemen, Iraq etc. than East Arabia in many ways. Or at least to a similar degree.
For instance Hijaz is far closer in every way to the Levant, Egypt and Yemen next door than East Arabia. Culturally, in terms of dialect, cuisine, geography, history etc.
I am not advocating for war with Iran or anybody, my premise is that they attack first without any reasons.
Obviously war is not good for the region but we have to defend ourselves in case of an attack.
All I know is that the Zionists and the Iranian Mullah regime (as well as their mostly nationalistic and secular opposition) are on the same page when it comes to Arabs and the Arab World. Meaning they wish to weaken us and fragment us. As history has demonstrated.
US would probably prefer a stable GCC (and region too) but obviously they are acting (in terms of Middle Eastern foreign policy) mostly on behalf of the Zionists.
The US probably wants a regime change in Iran and for Iran to become a more pro-Western country (in reality the Iranian Mullahs, if they could, would love to have great ties with the West - hence the many negotiations with them - the obstacle to that is mostly the Zionists and some internal hardliners), and that is probably what will occur down the road one way or another. Either by the regime collapsing internally or due to some war/conflict.
Any way, I am not too bothered about this as it does not relate to us, nor do I have any impact to start or prevent a conflict, but obviously we need to be vigilant given the close geographic proximity.
I don't feel the least sorry for the Mullah regime either, they have been an enormous source for instability themselves since 1979. Wish no harm for non-hostile Iranian civilians but that is about it.
I am sure that most Iranians would have similar sentiments towards KSA and the wider Arab World in the same situation so let us not pretend that my views are controversial.
Nor is this some grand fight for "Islam" or against the "West" or whatever some propagandists make it sound like. Just like some of those clowns made propaganda that Iran attacked Israel in "defense of Palestinians" while in reality they were the ones that were being carpet bombed first so they had to at least do something in return. Prior to that they did not lobby a single missile towards Israel during the Gaza genocide nor afterwards. So much for their "resistance" against the West and Zionists.
Of course this entire propaganda was long ago exposed when they themselves supported the US invasion of Iraq (the only reason why they have any influence in Iraq to this day) to overthrow their former archenemy Saddam Hussein and likewise the Taliban in Afghanistan.