Samurai
Registered Member
Was watching this video from Defence Dynamics India channel on Youtube where they are comparing Pakistani Al-Khalid vs Indian T-90 Bhisma. Obviously they conclude that T90 is superior based on:
1) Composite Layered Ceramic ERA Protection vs Modular Composite Armor + ERA in AK
2) Active Electronic Countermeasures vs Passive Protection in AK
3) Electro-Optical Jammer/Infrared Dazzler vs Thermal Smoke Generator and IR-Reflective Coatings on AK
Although they themselves are admitting that this is not a huge gap in terms of capability but their "critics" call Al-Khalid as outdated. My pov is that they haven't compared it with AK-1 and the new VT-4/Haider and competed their mainstay MBT T-90 to earlier version of Al-Khalid.
1) Composite Layered Ceramic ERA Protection vs Modular Composite Armor + ERA in AK
2) Active Electronic Countermeasures vs Passive Protection in AK
3) Electro-Optical Jammer/Infrared Dazzler vs Thermal Smoke Generator and IR-Reflective Coatings on AK
Although they themselves are admitting that this is not a huge gap in terms of capability but their "critics" call Al-Khalid as outdated. My pov is that they haven't compared it with AK-1 and the new VT-4/Haider and competed their mainstay MBT T-90 to earlier version of Al-Khalid.








