PTI News, Updates and Discussion

Do you think PTI has a future without Imran Khan?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 19.6%
  • No

    Votes: 80 71.4%
  • Only if senior leadership is released

    Votes: 10 8.9%

  • Total voters
    112
Status
Not open for further replies.
LIke Zardari said first year in Jail is easy. Things start to get real after 2 years.

Now IK will make a deal and this eye drama will also calm tits of youthias who want him to die but not make a deal.
 
Well, I heard it from one of the national journalists couple of years back. I thought it was common knowledge.

Just a quick search brought back this

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Rana Sanaullah was nabbed by the ANF headed by a Brigadier and by all accounts, establishment back then wanted to sort him out. And if Sanaullah is actually true to himself, will know this. None of PTI wallays who understand the dynamics blame Shahbaz Shareef for all the crimes committed since regime change operation. Shahbaz, Zardari, they are all petty street criminals as compared to the GHQ lot, and those are the ones responsible for things happening to PTI. PTI fight is with the GHQ, not with irrelevant PMLN or PPP.
 

Imran will be taken wherever he prefers for medical treatment, says Tariq Fazal Chaudhry

News Desk
February 13, 2026

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry on Friday said that PTI founder Imran Khan would be taken “wherever he prefers” for medical treatment amid claims regarding the incarcerated leader’s vision, stating that there would be “no negligence in the matter”.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court (SC) was informed that PTI founder Imran Khan’s right eye had only 15 per cent vision remaining, prompting a strong response from the party.

Addressing the media outside Parliament, Chaudhry said: “Wherever he (Imran) wants to go for a check-up, he will be taken. If he wants to go to Al-Shifa Eye Trust, then he will be taken there. There will be no negligence in the matter.”

“If the CJP recommends a doctor, he will be taken there,” Chaudhry added.

He called on the opposition to refrain from politicising the issue. “This is a sensitive issue; politicising it and misrepresenting facts is completely unfair.”
 
We don't come to Pakistan because Pakistan is shit. There are no jobs, no decent healthcare, poor infrastructure, the economy is propped up by migrant workers working on slave wages abroad.

We want it to be better, thats why we supported PTI, not the same failed cabal of thieves. Had PTI been given a fair shot, if they failed, we've have probably stopped supporting them too.
Are you for real my friend ? The support that PTI got no other civilian setup before it was given.
 

Imran will be taken wherever he prefers for medical treatment, says Tariq Fazal Chaudhry

News Desk
February 13, 2026

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry on Friday said that PTI founder Imran Khan would be taken “wherever he prefers” for medical treatment amid claims regarding the incarcerated leader’s vision, stating that there would be “no negligence in the matter”.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court (SC) was informed that PTI founder Imran Khan’s right eye had only 15 per cent vision remaining, prompting a strong response from the party.

Addressing the media outside Parliament, Chaudhry said: “Wherever he (Imran) wants to go for a check-up, he will be taken. If he wants to go to Al-Shifa Eye Trust, then he will be taken there. There will be no negligence in the matter.”

“If the CJP recommends a doctor, he will be taken there,” Chaudhry added.

He called on the opposition to refrain from politicising the issue. “This is a sensitive issue; politicising it and misrepresenting facts is completely unfair.”

Ground work being laid out to shift PTI founder to UK

LOL
 
sir, I dont agree with your views respectfully!

Pak, is today, where it is now, bec. of a silent and educated illiterate majority!

people who seek hard spoken bosses and dowry laden wives!


Pak. is not shit, the way I see it, we all are shit!

frankly, the way you call Pak. 'shit' saddens, I hope you never get respect, wherever you go!
I agree with you, but you need to be less defensive. Stop treating Pakistan as a sacred concept - something that cannot be criticized. To carry on with my own crude terminology if the people are "shit", who makes them "shit"? Who makes them uneducated? Who has ghost schools? Who is responsible for ill trained teachers? Why are high school girls from the village down the road from mine protesting on the street about a lack of teachers in their school?! Who is responsible for that?

The mountains? the plains? the rivers? The sky? The trees? I don't think so?

Maybe it's the people? The people who reside within the state? Those self anointed to govern them? Those hired to carry out the will of our self anointed leadership? All of us?

What do you call that if not Pakistan? Pakistan isn't just an idea, a border, a geographical space - that's just the box Pakistan sits in. Pakistan is the people and the processes. All those who define the processes, who implement them, who exist within them, within various degrees share blame for the sorry state of events.

As Pakistani's, overseas or domestic - we need to demand better and we need to call a spade a spade.

You live in Pakistan, you are a 100 times greater stakeholder than me. You should want this even more. You should be an even greater critic of anyone who fails to deliver and an even greater supporter of anyone trying.

I live in the UK - i consider it a failed state too. I define a successful state one where a labourer can have a wife, children and afford 3 meals a day, clothes, shelter, warmth, healthcare and education. It's a simple formula. Any state that cannot provide that, is failing in my opinion.
 

Is another judicial murder in the making?​


Lawyers cite ICCPR obligations; others defend limited judicial role

Hasnaat Malik
February 13, 2026

pakistan tehreek e insaf founder imran khan photo file


Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder Imran Khan. Photo: File

ISLAMABAD: A growing chorus within the legal community has voiced serious concern over what it describes as the superior judiciary's failure to ensure the availability of basic rights to former prime minister Imran Khan during his imprisonment.

Senior lawyers say the findings contained in the report submitted by lawyer Salman Safdar regarding Imran Khan's living conditions point to grave violations of the jail manual.

For them, the issue has moved beyond routine prison administration and entered the domain of constitutional guarantees and judicial responsibility.

Lawyer Faisal Siddiqui stressed judges must recognise the gravity of the situation. "Judges should realise that, like Bhutto, this is another judicial murder in the making. The only difference is that this will be a result of judicial inaction, not judicial decision."

However, despite the criticism, one member of the PTI legal team remains optimistic, saying he expects Imran Khan's bail and release from jail soon.

On the other hand, lawyer Sameer Khosa, who has represented PTI in several cases, termed the report a damning indictment of the jail administration, the government and the superior judiciary.

"The jail administration criminally neglected Imran Khan's complaints regarding his eyesight and health," he said.

"The courts failed to ensure adequate access to medical professionals despite several applications to this effect. The government underplayed the seriousness of his condition, the treatment, and his post-treatment condition."

He said that the Islamabad High Court (IHC) failed to fix numerous contempt petitions against the previous superintendent of jail, allowing his criminal negligence to continue while depriving meetings with lawyers and family that could have highlighted the issue earlier.
 
You lot are lost in ishq a Immy.

Thanks for your concern about immy eye, but you should rather focus on your sandh in ICU. Whats the latest? Did humpty dumpty had a great fall, or someone within the institution did number on him? its all very suspicious.
 
"It establishes beyond any doubt that Imran Khan is being subjected to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment in violation of the Constitution and Pakistan's international law obligations under the ICCPR and the Convention Against Torture," he added

Lawyer Abdul Moiz Jaferii said that after allegedly taking away almost all of his mandate, the state has also seen fit to take most of the sight in Imran Khan's right eye.

"It is nothing less than a theft. Too scared to let him out for treatment, too scared to admit that they did take him to a hospital until denying it stopped serving any purpose, the state cannot now claim it was the fault of the jail doctor or the warden," he added.

Jaferii further said that this loss lies at the doorstep of the houses of power populated by men who do not enjoy the will of the people to be in them. Don't trust my saying so? Just ask the people. Only count their votes properly this time, he added.
 
Heated scenes unfolded in the Senate on Thursday after Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) senators staged a protest over Imran Khan's health, placing his photographs on their desks, prompting objections from treasury members and ultimately forcing the chair to adjourn proceedings.

The confrontation followed remarks by Opposition Leader and Majlis Wahdatul Muslimeen (MWM) chief Allama Raja Nasir Abbas, who told the house that PTI founder Imran Khan had lost 85% of the vision in one eye due to alleged medical negligence while in custody.

In response, the prime minister's adviser on political affairs, Rana Sanaullah, offered the opposition that if a better specialist than those at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) was available, Imran could also be examined there.

The house met here with Presiding Officer Waqar Mehdi in the chair. Abbas took the floor at the outset of proceedings, telling lawmakers that a report submitted to the Supreme Court confirmed Imran had developed an eye condition that went untreated for three months.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top