Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[جوبا]

Iran also reportedly has a radar station in Sudan,

Any source for this?

 

[tsunset]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Kiev is largely at the range of Iranian missiles

Operation Ukrainian Freedom should be in the plans of IRGCAF

 

[Mehdipersian]

La Pucelle

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

One word:
Epstein

 

[VCheng]

Any source for this?

In April 2025, satellite imagery analysis cited in *** indicated the presence of an Iranian-made Matla-al-Fajr-1 early-warning radar at Al-Bahri military base (near Khartoum), with additional sites along the Red Sea coast near Port Sudan.

The same system reportedly has a ~300 km detection range, and can track up to ~100 aerial targets simultaneously.

 

[Persian Gulf]

Qasem Basir MRBM (1200km range) with EO seeker

if deployed in considerable numbers in the south of Iran, it can be used in an anti-ship role to keep US ships > 1200km away from Iranian coasts (and 2500km away from Tehran)

 

[Beast89]

La Pucelle

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Europeans and American trying to prove who is the truest Goyim

 

[Kyussis]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Kiev is largely at the range of Iranian missiles

Operation Ukrainian Freedom should be in the plans of IRGCAF

I wander if Reza pahlavi also begged Zalinski to bomb Iran for him?

 

[Homajon]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[925boy]

If US is really bringing more resources and possibly the second carrier group then its like war is imminent and Iran is waiting until the enemy is fully deployed, assembled and prepared with all its assets in place.

Looks the "talks" are just time buying until US position everything in order?

If they are bringing more carrier groups then it seems US has made up its mind already. Then why to let enemy fully prepare and deploy?

I think Iran should tell the world and to the US that if they deploy any further resources at their door step that would mean declaration of war. Like another carrier group coming near 1000 miles would be considered an act of war. You just can't let enemy line up its assets around you peacefully. So if they back off that's well and good, if they don't then it means they are coming for war and you have every right to start your attacks.

Excellent post and I agree!

Iran is basically in the Russian predicament (vis a vis Ukraine)- Wait while your enemy builds up perfectly o your doorstep and Iran may lose its state or preempt the threat to it and attack first and have a better chance of an outcome that isn't as bad for Iran.

Iran sort of cant lose by attacking first,because the threat to Iran is so much from US now, that even if Iran deals with US or global consequences fkr attacking first, that is ok for Iran to accept and manage, because the threat level was too high To do nothing and expect miraculously that all woiod end well for Iran.

When the 2 options we have are worse vs worst, its always better to choose the worse option, not tje worst one. Waiting for US to attack first Iran's worst option IMO.

 

[hussain0216]

A modern aircraft carrier is impossible to sink. There have been lots of studies on this, and various scenarios have been tried out by the Americans in this regard.

It's a ship, it can be sunk


It's all about tactics, it has to remain out of range and far enough away where it can't be repeatedly tested

If it sits in range trading blows, then it's only a matter of time before its hit or overwhelmed

 

[hussain0216]

La Pucelle

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Great, he can take all the f'kin Jews then, because in the middle east they have been more of a cancerous tumor

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iran is not going to compromise on its red lines and rights

the US can either respect Iran's rights or go to war to coerce Iran to give up its rights

 

[Mero]

Russia Punishes Trump’s Enemies​

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has investigated and sued Trump for alleged fraud, and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who reportedly ignored pressure from Trump to reverse the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, were placed on the list.

Also sanctioned was Jack Smith, the Justice Department special counsel overseeing the investigation into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election and Trump's handling of classified documents after leaving the White House.

Another person singled out by the Kremlin was Lieutenant Michael Byrd, the U.S. Capitol Police Officer who shot pro-Trump rioter Ashli Babbitt during the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Although Byrd has no public connection to Russia, he was called a "thug" by Trump, who pushed unsuccessfully for the officer to be charged in Babbitt's death.

Other prominent figures on the new list from Russia include former President Barack Obama and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, as well as late-night television hosts Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Myers.

"Needless to say, nobody from Fox News or the extreme right is being sanctioned," Swedish economist Anders Åslund wrote in the Kyiv Post.

Russia punishes Trump's enemies

In a new list of sanctions, the Kremlin penalized prominent adversaries of former President Donald Trump who have no known connections to Russian policy.

www.newsweek.com

Putin is an anti-Obama operation, not an anti-American operation. Iran benefits from peacenik Democrats and their JCPOA. Neocons such a Putin and Trump are not helping Iran by supporting Republicans in the US.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1747 supported by Putin and Russia was a United Nations Security Council resolution, written with reference to some IAEA reports, that tightened the sanctions imposed on Iran in connection with the Iranian nuclear program. It was adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 24 March 2007.

In June 2006, the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany offered a package of economic incentives including transfer of technology in the civilian nuclear field, in exchange for Iran to give up permanently its disputed uranium enrichment programme.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1803 – passed on 3 March 2008 and supported by Russia. Extended the asset freezes and called upon states to monitor the activities of Iranian banks, inspect Iranian ships and aircraft, and to monitor the movement of individuals involved with the program through their territory, impose travel restrictions on sanctioned persons, and bar exports of nuclear- and missile-related dual-use goods to Iran.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 – passed on 9 June 2010, supported by Russia. Banned Iran from participating in any activities related to ballistic missiles, tightened the arms embargo, travel bans on individuals involved with the program, froze the funds and assets of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, and recommended that states inspect Iranian cargo, prohibit the servicing of Iranian vessels involved in prohibited activities, prevent the provision of financial services used for sensitive nuclear activities, closely watch Iranian individuals and entities when dealing with them, prohibit the opening of Iranian banks on their territory and prevent Iranian banks from entering into relationship with their banks if it might contribute to the nuclear program, and prevent financial institutions operating in their territory from opening offices and accounts in Iran.

Russia did not defend Iran in the UNSC, got it involved in outside pressure from the US to weaken Iran.

 

[Mero]

When Obama was bad with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929, Russia said they support Obama. When Trump pulled out of the JCPOA, Russia continued to support Trump.

 

[Mero]

The goal of Putin is for enemies of America to believe Putin is their defender. To have Russia be the last (phony) resistance to the US and then to surrender to the US for a Pax Americana.

Grabbing popcorn to see this.