Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Emirzad said:
But I thought nuke n missile infra was destroyed, Iran is crippled, 50K IRGC have defected. Lol @ clowns
Click to expand...
Trump and America wants Iran to return as an obedient police dog that balances the blocs in the Middle East..But how to achieve this, no one has a well-thought-out plan.

Even when the bombing begins, you will notice that they will not attack oil and energy facilities because the collapse of Iran is not in their interest,
On the contrary, it will benefit Israel's competitors..

Therefore, all these negotiations are in order to find collaborators to sell the guide and the Revolutionary Guards, as it happened in Venezuela, and establish a transitional phase that turns Iran into a major ally of America in the region.
 
Last edited:
The SC said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...



BTW, in South China sea, readiness drills take place after every 2 or 3 years, that involves carrier strike groups.
Last time, on the Chinese side, a large exercise, un-settled the USA and Pelocy had to visit Taiwan.

war could happen any time, with this much weapons in the vicinity, it is undeniable.

but, it is also possible, it could be a pressure tactic to:

1. start a war and bring enemy on the nego. table
2. determine favorable outcomes

if IR can deny 2, war will not last long
 
But some Iranian Commanders might prefer attacking the hardest target first, like the Carrier Battle Group (I prefer easier targets first though), so I asked ChatGPT which is better :

Q to CHATGPT : In military strategy, which one is better? Attacking easier-to-defeat targets first or harder-to-defeat targets first?

CHATGPT ANSWER :
In military strategy, neither approach is universally “better.” The choice between attacking easier targets first or harder targets first depends on objectives, resources, timing, and the broader strategic situation. Both approaches are well documented in military theory and history.


1. Attacking Easier Targets First (Indirect or Sequential Strategy)​


This approach focuses on defeating weaker positions first to build momentum.


Advantages​


  • Builds morale and momentum through early victories.
  • Preserves resources by avoiding heavy losses early.
  • Cuts off the enemy gradually (supply lines, allies, territory).
  • Allows learning and adaptation before facing stronger defenses.

Theoretical support​


  • Sun Tzu in The Art of War emphasized:

    “Avoid what is strong, strike at what is weak.”
    Click to expand...

This principle underlies maneuver warfare and modern operational planning.


Historical examples​


  • Napoleon Bonaparte often defeated isolated enemy forces one at a time rather than confronting combined armies directly.
  • The Allied “island-hopping” strategy in the Pacific during World War II bypassed heavily fortified positions to capture weaker but strategically useful islands.

Risks​


  • The enemy’s strongest positions remain intact and may regroup.
  • The war can drag on if decisive points are avoided too long.


2. Attacking Harder Targets First (Decisive or Center-of-Gravity Strategy)​


This approach aims to destroy the enemy’s strongest or most critical capability early.


Advantages​


  • Can end the war faster if successful.
  • Breaks the enemy’s command structure or core military strength.
  • Prevents the opponent from organizing long-term resistance.

Theoretical support​


  • Carl von Clausewitz in On War emphasized striking the enemy’s center of gravity—the source of their strength.

Historical examples​


  • Germany’s early World War II strategy sought rapid decisive victories through concentrated force (Blitzkrieg).
  • Some modern doctrines aim at decapitation strikes (leadership or command networks).

Risks​


  • High casualties and resource consumption.
  • If the attack fails, the attacker may lose strategic initiative.
  • Requires strong intelligence and superior force concentration.


3. What Modern Military Strategy Generally Prefers​


Modern doctrine usually combines both approaches:


Typical sequence:


  1. Weaken the enemy first (logistics, communications, air defenses).
  2. Isolate strong positions.
  3. Strike decisive targets once the balance shifts.

This is often called shaping operations → decisive operations.



✅ General rule of thumb:


  • If resources are limited → attack easier targets first to build advantage.
  • If overwhelming superiority exists → attack harder decisive targets first to end the conflict quickly.
 
The SC said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


The figure of 40-50% is incorrect relative to USAF/USN/Marine airpower .... just look at the inventory list of the respective arms, and you will see the statement by Robert A. Pape is incorrect.
 
HBicWwoW8AABKCD


Regional pups will pay.
 
mangekyo said:
It's not about Turks not wanting to take a harder stance against Israel. It's that they are actively working for their interests. We were saying for years that Turkey and GCC are funding and training ISIS and Al-Qaida in Syria and Iraq to dismantle AoR. But we were accused of being the ones who work for Israel, wanting to genocide Sunnis etc. Now we can even read in the Epstein files that we were right. Turks because of their sect even got a pass for providing Israel with oil while they were geocoding Palestinians. The fact you still "love Turkey and refuse to condemn them proves my point" Muslim world will always favor sects over Islam.
Click to expand...
How it proves your point? By refusing to take a side between two rival and diverging paths muslim countries itself?
 
About time china and russia grow a pair

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Reichsmarschall said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

If this guy turns out right...I will shave my head on video and post it. Fkig children....talking nonsense.

Don't repost obviously bs kid stuff....let's keep this place serious
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 3 more.
    • Total: 83 (members: 11, guests: 72)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top