- Thread starter
- #256
You need to stop thinking of it as a plane Vs plane situation
And more as a system Vs system
JF17s with AESA radars, backed by ground radars, AWACs, linked all together and a long range BVR will rip the Su-30 with it's massive RCS a new ass hole
The SU-30 will do well to stay far away
You need to stop thinking of it as a plane Vs plane situation
And more as a system Vs system
JF17s with AESA radars, backed by ground radars, AWACs, linked all together and a long range BVR will rip the Su-30 with it's massive RCS a new ass hole
The SU-30 will do well to stay far away
There is only 30 Aesa equipped JF17 v 265 Pesa equipped Su30mki
The rest of The Jf17 fleet is old block one and two with weak radar and limited SD10 radar.
For the record the Su30mki are having Astra induction which is 160km range bvr now so engagement envelope is bigger
You mentioned Su30mki staying away
I believe the PAF are so paranoid about S400 umbrella your AWACS and thunders won't fly close to to Line of control to engage anyway
This is why to actually threaten Indian assets you trying to induct
One a rocket force cause your Airforce locks the range and quality of fighters that can fight in a contested air space
Your doctrine is purely defensive or stay in Pak airspace and have your j10c and limited aesa equipped thunders backed by AWACS engage ingress Indian fighters
Judging by Indian equipment orders and modernisation plans that is not happening they won't enter that zone
Brahmos next gen
Lora
Scalp
Are 500km range cruise missles
Bvrs are hyper sonics in future
Astra 2-Indian
SFDR Indian
Meteore french
Sky flash Israel
R37 Russian
Again 200km away
Both sides will adapt lessons from previous engagement
India has far more options and multiple times the resources to change doctrine and engage from further away




