Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this missile base really destroyed? I thought they're supposed to be 200-500 meters deep underground and untouchable by bunker-busters?
An Israeli just claimed that the Israeli regime is lying and that Israel is being pounded HARD.
Is this missile base really destroyed? I thought they're supposed to be 200-500 meters deep underground and untouchable by bunker-busters?
Because I'm getting worried reading reports of the lower rate of fire from Iran, so I wanted to find out different sources to find out if Iran's missile bases are still safe and untouched or not.Why are you sharing Israeli Hasbara?
Don't share Israeli sources here. Israel lies.Because I'm getting worried reading reports of the lower rate of fire from Iran, so I wanted to find out different sources to find out if Iran's missile bases are still safe and untouched or not.
Reuters: The high-rise building in Bahrain Financial Harbour, which was hit by Iranian drones, houses the Israeli embassy in Manama, Bahrain
It's close to the border, so probably true although impact may be exaggerated.Why are you sharing Israeli Hasbara?
ZERO evidence exists except unilateral claims otherwise I am waiting for it.
Fleet is not even FMC, few airframes are barely flyable so the entire logic is chimp level that IRGC will allow IRIAF to send 1-2 barely flyable airframes of a defenseless attack aircraft to warzone while they can pound the very same target with their own tools. IRIAF barely has few F-5E/F, MIG-29 and some upgraded F-4E/D "Dowran" squadron from underground base Oghab-44 at their disposal even they are not flying except for random drone interception here and there. F-14A/AM, SU-24MK, SU-22M3/M4, F-7, Mirages are all grounded which makes the entire claim BS.
Like I said, its more like Qataris saw which aircraft do they own, oh there is an attack aircraft, lets just claim it because we have nothing else to show.
Source is on record referring to Palestinian Shaheed as Pallywood - is pro-Israel and has been a Israeli mouthpiece since 7th October 2023. If we have a policy of no Israeli sources - do we break it when it suits our narrative building? and dismiss it when it doesn't?It's close to the border, so probably true although impact may be exaggerated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.