Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Iranians seemed to listen advice from @Persian Gulf , now those bases are pounding enemy without particular problems.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
mulj said:
Irsnians seemed to listen advice from @Persian Gulf , now tho bases are pounding enemy without particular problems.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...



This is key and shows Iranian missile bases can take heavy Zio-US bombing and still function.

If Iran can keep firing from these bases and mobile launchers, then Zio-US will be in trouble within less than a week as its ABM interceptors start running out.
 
Nearly 14,000 flights scheduled to depart from large airports in 10 countries have been canceled since the United States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28, data from Flightradar24 shows. https://cnn.it/3Nj1t6e
 
Seeing the apocalyptic black smoke burning scenes of oil depots near Tehran, this war shows that having decent AD to shoot down enemy planes is important. If Iran had enough money to invest in AD, it could have prevented a more tougher challenge to the USAF. I'll repost this conversation I had with ChatGPT trying to analyze what level of Air Defenses at what scale Iran needs to be able to shoot down US planes reliably :

My Question : To defend a large country like Iran from major bombings by a major Air Force power like the US, how many S-300-equivalent batteries should be enough? 2 dozen? 3 dozen? Should be complemented by AWACS daily patrol too?

ChatGPT Answer :

Short answer: Two or three dozen S-300–equivalent batteries would not be enough to defend a very large country like Iran from a major U.S.-level air campaign. Realistically, you would need many dozens to over a hundred long-range SAM batteries, plus a layered network (radars, fighters, medium/short-range SAMs, EW, decoys, and mobility). Otherwise a modern air force will suppress them.
Let’s break it down.

1. Size of the country vs SAM coverage​

Iran is huge:
  • ~1.65 million km² land area
  • Mountains and deserts create radar blind spots
  • Many high-value targets: nuclear sites, oil terminals, airbases, ports, cities
Even with long-range SAMs like the
S-300PMU2, the effective defended zone is far smaller than the missile’s maximum range.
Typical effective coverage of a battery is roughly:
  • ~120–150 km defensive radius (practical coverage)
  • But terrain and radar horizon shrink this significantly.
Also, SAMs usually protect specific sites, not continuous airspace.
Example: Iran only received four S-300 batteries, which were used to guard key nuclear facilities instead of the whole country.

2. Realistic number needed for nationwide defense​

Military analysts usually think in “air defense zones” rather than country coverage.
A rough estimate:
PurposeBatteries
Capital region6–8
Nuclear facilities8–12
Major airbases12–20
Oil infrastructure10–20
Strategic ports6–10
Mobile reserve10–20
Total realistic range:
➡ 60–100+ long-range SAM batteries
And that’s still not a guarantee of air denial.

3. Why even 100 batteries may not stop the US​

A modern US campaign would include:
  • Stealth aircraft
    • F-35 Lightning II
    • B-2 Spirit
  • Suppression of Air Defenses (SEAD)
  • Anti-radiation missiles like
    AGM-88 HARM
  • Stand-off cruise missiles
  • Electronic warfare aircraft
  • Cyber attacks on radar networks
Air defenses are usually destroyed early in a war.
Recent conflicts show this:
  • Ukraine loses S-300 systems regularly
  • Israeli strikes reportedly disabled major parts of Iran’s air defense network during attacks.

4. Why layered air defense matters more​

Modern doctrine uses multiple layers, not just S-300-type systems.
Example structure:

Long range​

  • S-300
  • S-400 Triumf
  • Iranian Bavar-373
Purpose:
  • bombers
  • AWACS
  • tankers

Medium range​

Example systems:
  • Buk-M2
  • Iranian Khordad-15
Purpose:
  • fighters
  • cruise missiles

Short range / point defense​

  • Pantsir-S1
  • Tor / MANPADS
Purpose:
  • drones
  • glide bombs
  • anti-radiation missiles

5. AWACS patrols are absolutely critical​

Yes — AWACS dramatically improves air defense effectiveness.
Example aircraft:
  • E-3 Sentry
Benefits:
  • Detect aircraft 400–600 km away
  • Look over mountains
  • Track low-flying cruise missiles
  • Coordinate SAM batteries
  • Prevent radar ambush
Without AWACS, ground radars can be blinded.

6. Realistic “minimum credible” defense network​

For a country the size of Iran, a strong defensive network might look like:
Long-range SAM
  • 80–120 batteries
Medium-range SAM
  • 200–300 batteries
Short-range / point defense
  • hundreds of systems
Airborne early warning
  • 6–12 AWACS
Fighter interceptors
  • 150–300 aircraft
Even this would only make bombing difficult, not impossible.
✅ Bottom line
Your guess of 2–3 dozen S-300 batteries is far too small.
For a country like Iran:
  • 60–100+ long-range SAM batteries
  • hundreds of other air defenses
  • AWACS + fighters
…would be needed to create a serious air-denial network against a major power.
✅ Simple summary
ComponentAmount
Missiles per launcher4
Launchers per battery6–12
Ready missiles per battery24–48
If you want, I can also show you something interesting:
Why even Russia (the world’s largest SAM user) still struggles to stop Western airpower — the numbers are very surprising.
 
1000232006.jpg

The United States military was likely responsible for the strike on an elementary school in southern Iran that killed scores of children, the deadliest incident of civilian casualties in the US and Israel’s almost week-long war with Iran, according to CNN and expert analysis of evidence. https://cnn.it/4lyuBDr
 
StrategicBear said:
Seeing the apocalyptic black smoke burning scenes of oil depots near Tehran, this war shows that having decent AD to shoot down enemy planes is important. If Iran had enough money to invest in AD, it could have prevented a more tougher challenge to the USAF. I'll repost this conversation I had with ChatGPT trying to analyze what level of Air Defenses at what scale Iran needs to be able to shoot down US planes reliably :

My Question : To defend a large country like Iran from major bombings by a major Air Force power like the US, how many S-300-equivalent batteries should be enough? 2 dozen? 3 dozen? Should be complemented by AWACS daily patrol too?

ChatGPT Answer :

Short answer: Two or three dozen S-300–equivalent batteries would not be enough to defend a very large country like Iran from a major U.S.-level air campaign. Realistically, you would need many dozens to over a hundred long-range SAM batteries, plus a layered network (radars, fighters, medium/short-range SAMs, EW, decoys, and mobility). Otherwise a modern air force will suppress them.
Let’s break it down.

1. Size of the country vs SAM coverage​

Iran is huge:
  • ~1.65 million km² land area
  • Mountains and deserts create radar blind spots
  • Many high-value targets: nuclear sites, oil terminals, airbases, ports, cities
Even with long-range SAMs like the
S-300PMU2, the effective defended zone is far smaller than the missile’s maximum range.
Typical effective coverage of a battery is roughly:
  • ~120–150 km defensive radius (practical coverage)
  • But terrain and radar horizon shrink this significantly.
Also, SAMs usually protect specific sites, not continuous airspace.
Example: Iran only received four S-300 batteries, which were used to guard key nuclear facilities instead of the whole country.

2. Realistic number needed for nationwide defense​

Military analysts usually think in “air defense zones” rather than country coverage.
A rough estimate:
PurposeBatteries
Capital region6–8
Nuclear facilities8–12
Major airbases12–20
Oil infrastructure10–20
Strategic ports6–10
Mobile reserve10–20
Total realistic range:
➡ 60–100+ long-range SAM batteries
And that’s still not a guarantee of air denial.

3. Why even 100 batteries may not stop the US​

A modern US campaign would include:
  • Stealth aircraft
    • F-35 Lightning II
    • B-2 Spirit
  • Suppression of Air Defenses (SEAD)
  • Anti-radiation missiles like
    AGM-88 HARM
  • Stand-off cruise missiles
  • Electronic warfare aircraft
  • Cyber attacks on radar networks
Air defenses are usually destroyed early in a war.
Recent conflicts show this:
  • Ukraine loses S-300 systems regularly
  • Israeli strikes reportedly disabled major parts of Iran’s air defense network during attacks.

4. Why layered air defense matters more​

Modern doctrine uses multiple layers, not just S-300-type systems.
Example structure:

Long range​

  • S-300
  • S-400 Triumf
  • Iranian Bavar-373
Purpose:
  • bombers
  • AWACS
  • tankers

Medium range​

Example systems:
  • Buk-M2
  • Iranian Khordad-15
Purpose:
  • fighters
  • cruise missiles

Short range / point defense​

  • Pantsir-S1
  • Tor / MANPADS
Purpose:
  • drones
  • glide bombs
  • anti-radiation missiles

5. AWACS patrols are absolutely critical​

Yes — AWACS dramatically improves air defense effectiveness.
Example aircraft:
  • E-3 Sentry
Benefits:
  • Detect aircraft 400–600 km away
  • Look over mountains
  • Track low-flying cruise missiles
  • Coordinate SAM batteries
  • Prevent radar ambush
Without AWACS, ground radars can be blinded.

6. Realistic “minimum credible” defense network​

For a country the size of Iran, a strong defensive network might look like:
Long-range SAM
  • 80–120 batteries
Medium-range SAM
  • 200–300 batteries
Short-range / point defense
  • hundreds of systems
Airborne early warning
  • 6–12 AWACS
Fighter interceptors
  • 150–300 aircraft
Even this would only make bombing difficult, not impossible.
✅ Bottom line
Your guess of 2–3 dozen S-300 batteries is far too small.
For a country like Iran:
  • 60–100+ long-range SAM batteries
  • hundreds of other air defenses
  • AWACS + fighters
…would be needed to create a serious air-denial network against a major power.
✅ Simple summary
ComponentAmount
Missiles per launcher4
Launchers per battery6–12
Ready missiles per battery24–48
If you want, I can also show you something interesting:
Why even Russia (the world’s largest SAM user) still struggles to stop Western airpower — the numbers are very surprising.
Click to expand...
No AI garbage please
 
White Privilege said:
That is right. The Iranians have nothing to loose now. Although US can easily switch to destruction of their oil and power facilities, it will also be seen as detrimental to Iranian people, whom the US sympathize with atleast openly.
Click to expand...
Attack on energy facilities has begun it appears. Phase two, I believe. Since Iranians are refusing to budge. It will be interesting to see, as Iran can only target the nearby Gulf energy infrastructure in a similar retaliation, when it just promised to not attack them, if not attacked from there.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 119 (members: 13, guests: 106)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top