Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

"According to source in Kabul, Taliban have communicated to Pakistan that they are ready for dialogue from zero on issues of TTP and others, however demanded a ceasefire.Pakistan is ready to resume negotiation not from zero but from where it ended in Istanbul & Doha. However, the demand for ceasefire is rejected saying talks and fight will go together. A good strategy."
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
"According to source in Kabul, Taliban have communicated to Pakistan that they are ready for dialogue from zero on issues of TTP and others, however demanded a ceasefire.Pakistan is ready to resume negotiation not from zero but from where it ended in Istanbul & Doha. However, the demand for ceasefire is rejected saying talks and fight will go together. A good strategy."
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Surrender and hand over ttp goons
 
went back few pages and i was right , we have been slowly strike few targets a night for a week straight
6 > Kapisa Province
7 >Gulano Camp ( response to miranshah)
8> just happened few hours ago
Slow and steady wins the race....

Not to mention airstrikes inside Afganistan coincided with the US/Israil-Iran war. Is it accidental?
 
No confirmation of such so treat it as a rumour but would be good news of finally hitting a worthy target after 3 days (compared to TTP camps or border posts)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
"According to source in Kabul, Taliban have communicated to Pakistan that they are ready for dialogue from zero on issues of TTP and others, however demanded a ceasefire.Pakistan is ready to resume negotiation not from zero but from where it ended in Istanbul & Doha. However, the demand for ceasefire is rejected saying talks and fight will go together. A good strategy."
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



These requests for negotiations are a ruse for the afghandus to buy time and regroup. Notice how terrorism in Pakistan has decreased substantially since the Pakistani military started smashing the afghandus.

There is NOTHING to discuss with the afghandus. Just STOP terrorism in Pakistan and the killing of Pakistani civilians. LEAVE us the F**K alone. afghandus, get the F**K out of our country.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Peace is achieved through this. That's what we need right now. Our half cup full status will not deter aggression, which is very much on the cards not in distance future.

top-tsar-bomba-head_0.jpg
 
What solution do you suggest?
Army should be made accountable for their control over internal politics, internal and external security, and foreign policy.
Enough damage is done, if Pak can come out of this.
If any 30% chance there is fair elections, army role should be confined to defense, which is funny thing anyway. That's their automatic role.
 
@hasssanali8998 @Panzerkiel

I asked AI (Grok) to scrape open source news channels, Twitter and journalists on how many targets were likely struck by Pakistan in Afghanistan, and what portion would it represent of a complete hypothetical military decapitation strike:

1. Compiled List of Claimed Targets in Operation Ghazb lil Haq

Based on a review of recent X posts from verified accounts (including journalists, official Pakistani sources, and analysts), as well as news reports from outlets like The Express Tribune, Hindustan Times, Dawn, and Wikipedia's entry on the 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war, the "64 locations effectively targeted by air" claim originates from Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar's official updates. This figure appears to be an aggregate of airstrikes, drone operations, and artillery hits since the operation's launch on February 27, 2026, primarily targeting Afghan Taliban military infrastructure such as brigade headquarters, ammunition depots, checkposts, logistics bases, and terrorist hideouts.

No comprehensive, independently verified list of all 64 specific sites exists—claims remain unconfirmed due to the fog of war, restricted access, and propaganda from both sides. Pakistani sources frame these as precise strikes against Taliban assets supporting cross-border aggression, while Afghan Taliban spokespeople (e.g., Zabihullah Mujahid) counter that many hits targeted civilian areas, mosques, schools, and refugee camps, with minimal military impact. International observers, including the UN and regional analysts, note a lack of third-party verification, and some reports suggest the number may include overlapping or exaggerated counts.

From cross-referenced sources, here's the closest compilation of mentioned targets or affected areas (grouped by province/type for clarity). This draws from progressive updates (e.g., 41 locations by March 2, 46 by March 3, 56 by March 4, up to 64 by March 8). Specific sites are rarely named beyond general descriptions, but patterns emerge:

Key Provinces and Regions Targeted (Afghan Side):

- Kabul Province: Multiple airstrikes on Taliban military offices, corps headquarters (e.g., western outskirts depot), and brigade HQs. Reports of secondary explosions from ammo storage. (Claimed hits: ~5-7 sites, including urban military installations.)

- Kandahar Province: Core Taliban headquarters, brigade HQs, ammunition depots, and logistics bases in the spiritual heartland. Strikes described as "significant damage." (Claimed hits: ~8-10, focusing on southern strongholds.)

- Paktia Province: Taliban battalion HQs, shelters, and launchpads for cross-border attacks. (Claimed hits: ~6-8.)

- Nangarhar Province: Brigade headquarters, ammo depots (e.g., near Jalalabad), and border installations. Early strikes focused here. (Claimed hits: ~7-9.)

- Khost Province: Checkposts, armories, and militant hideouts, including Anzar Sar (disputed capture by Taliban). (Claimed hits: ~5-6.)

- Paktika Province: Border posts and terrorist camps. (Claimed hits: ~4-5.)

- Helmand Province (including Lashkargah area): Military sites and depots. (Claimed hits: ~3-4.)

- Kunar, Laghman, Kunduz, and Other Eastern/Northern Provinces: Scattered strikes on hideouts, posts, and facilities. (Claimed hits: ~10-15 combined, often linked to TTP/ISIS-K camps.)

Border Sectors and Ground Targets (Pak-Afghan Frontier, Often Pakistani-Controlled but Involving Cross-Border Fire):

- Chaman, Noshki, Gudwana, Qila Saifullah, Zhob, Chiltan Ranges, Warsak (in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa sectors). These account for ~15-20 of the 64, focusing on destroyed checkposts (242 claimed overall) and captured positions.

Types of Targets:

- Headquarters and Command Centers: ~15-20 (e.g., brigade/corps HQs in Kabul, Kandahar, Nangarhar).

- Ammunition Depots and Logistics Bases: ~10-15 (causing visible secondary blasts).

- Checkposts and Border Installations: ~20-25 (destroyed or captured).

- Hideouts and Launchpads: ~10-15 (linked to anti-Pakistan militants like TTP).

This list represents a synthesis of Pakistani claims (e.g., from DG ISPR, Tarar, and accounts like @PakistanFauj, @KazmiWajahat), which emphasize military precision, versus Afghan denials of effectiveness and accusations of civilian harm. Journalists like Anas Mallick (@AnasMallick) report specific strikes (e.g., Nangarhar depots), but totals vary. The "closest to reality" is likely an overcount by Pakistan for propaganda, with actual unique targets closer to 40-50 distinct sites across 10-12 provinces, per cross-checked reports. Global calls for de-escalation highlight the risk of broader conflict without verification.

2. Hypothetical Decapitation Strike Analysis

A "decapitation strike" in military terms typically focuses on eliminating leadership and command structures to paralyze an adversary, but your query extends it to fully neutralizing military capabilities by targeting bases, storage depots, and depots across Afghanistan. Under the Taliban (post-2021 takeover), Afghanistan's armed forces are less centralized than the former Afghan National Army, relying on a mix of captured U.S./NATO equipment, Soviet-era gear, and irregular militias. They're organized into 8 corps (e.g., headquarters in Kabul, Kandahar, Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif, Helmand, Kunduz, Laghman, Gardez), with an estimated 165,000-170,000 personnel (including 90,000 local militias).

To hypothetically render Taliban military capabilities "to zero" in today's Afghanistan (as of March 2026), you'd need to strike a broad array of targets: all major command centers, airfields, vehicle/armor depots, ammo storage, fuel sites, and key militia hubs. Based on historical NATO infrastructure (which the Taliban inherited and consolidated), current Taliban structure, and reports on their assets (e.g., Bagram Airfield as a primary hub, Kandahar for southern ops, scattered depots in provinces like Helmand and Nangarhar), I'd estimate 120-180 total high-value targets.

- Breakdown: 8 corps HQs (core decapitation nodes); 10-15 major airbases/airfields (e.g., Bagram, Kandahar, Shindand, Kabul IA, Mazar-i-Sharif); 40-60 bases/outposts (consolidated from ~100 NATO-era sites, now focused in urban/provincial centers); 30-50 depots/storage facilities (ammo, vehicles like 2,000+ captured Humvees/MRAPs, helicopters); 20-30 militia/elite unit hubs (e.g., Badri 313 Battalion sites). This accounts for geographic spread across 34 provinces, but concentrated in 10-15 key ones (e.g., Kabul, Kandahar, Herat).

Pakistan's claimed 64 hits represent about 36-53% of this hypothetical total (64/180 ≈ 36%; 64/120 ≈ 53%). In reality, this would disrupt but not eliminate capabilities, as Taliban forces are decentralized, resilient to strikes (using caves/mountains for storage), and quick to relocate. A full neutralization would require sustained operations beyond a single strike wave, risking high civilian casualties and regional fallout.
 
If it makes you feel better I thought it was a mistake for DGISPR to politicise this issue. You are still free to point fingers until the cows come home but the bottom line is that Pakistan's approach to handling the Taliban threat is short-sighted. And this has been the case for quite sometime.

Taliban are a liability. They are not rational actors. They are nihilists.

What Pakistanis need to understand is that having Taliban associated with Pakistan in any possible way carries enormous risk. How long before they host the next OBL and the world comes bearing down on Afghanistan again? To think they will reform and change their old ways is a fantasy.

So I'm all for carrying out periodic strikes on TTA targets and TTP hideouts in Afghanistan. It sends a very clear message to the world and one that will be well-recieved in many capitals.
Enmity with Afghan has already stalled CPEC, all the fanfare is dead.
Roads is not cpec, trade is.
Enmity with Afghan is dangerous. Providing TTA safe heaven and logistics was ill sighted and enmity is same mistake. Army is not fit to negotiate with them.
 
The Afghan Taliban abandoned their vehicle after being fired upon by Pakistani security forces while patrolling near the Pak-Afghan border at Kurram Sector.

Just look at how fast they ran
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm no "army apologist" but between 1994-2021, that's a very big time frame and so much has happened during that period.

Pakistan did not create Taliban 1.0 in 1994. But as Taliban 1.0's popularity grew, Pakistan decided to support this group against the brutal warlords to end the Afghan civil war.

Do you think, Pakistan should've sealed the border and let the warlords massacre everyone in Afghanistan? Northern Alliance was locking up Taliban 1.0 fighters in containers and setting the containers ablaze. That's just one example of the brutality that was happening at that time in Afghanistan.

When Taliban 1.0 was toppled in 2001, they went quiet for a number of years. They had repeatedly requested to surrender to the Hamid Karzai Government but those requests were not entertained. That lead to the Taliban 1.0's rebellion against the Afghan Government.

By the time Mullah Omar passed away in a Karachi Hospital in April 2013, a new generation of Taliban had gradually replaced Taliban 1.0.

This new Taliban 2.0 didn't have much affiliation with Pakistan as they mainly operated from Afghanistan, while Pakistan was busy wresting TTP in the tribal areas in Pakistan.

It was only in July 2019, when Pakistani leadership was ordered by President Donald Trump to bring Taliban 2.0 to the negotiating table and help "extricate US forces" from Afghanistan, or he would kill 10 million people in Afghanistan that Pakistan seriously started talking with Taliban 2.0.

When Taliban 2.0 took over Afghanistan in August 2021, Pakistan tried to take all the credit for defeating the US via Taliban, but totally forgetting that the new Taliban was 2.0 and not 1.0. Pakistan had also not confronted NATO in Afghanistan at all.

04/09/2021: 'Don't worry, everything will be okay': ISI chief during Kabul visit: Dawn

View attachment 184002

Between 15 August 2021 and 28 February 2026, Pakistan had been trying to develop relationship with Taliban 2.0 like the one it had with Taliban 1.0, but this had not worked, as the Taliban 2.0 were more interested in exporting their ideology to Pakistan instead
That picture tells all.
Pak did not create them, but later give them every help. First Kabul take over couldn't be possible without PA.

TALIBAN didn't change. Same repressive and tribal mind. Women and girls can't go to school.
Pak afg borders were not sealed and could not be sealed, even today, per Army, they are entering Pakistan with the bajwa fence in place.
PA does not care Leili Desert massacre, it is just a number to them.
Bottom line, they can only do tactical work, strategy is not their capacity, especially politics and self interest run supreme.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top