Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

The Afghan Taliban abandoned their vehicle after being fired upon by Pakistani security forces while patrolling near the Pak-Afghan border at Kurram Sector.

Just look at how fast they ran
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

It's a shame so many escaped, I wish QC had dropped a mortar on them
 
@hasssanali8998 @Panzerkiel

I asked AI (Grok) to scrape open source news channels, Twitter and journalists on how many targets were likely struck by Pakistan in Afghanistan, and what portion would it represent of a complete hypothetical military decapitation strike:

1. Compiled List of Claimed Targets in Operation Ghazb lil Haq

Based on a review of recent X posts from verified accounts (including journalists, official Pakistani sources, and analysts), as well as news reports from outlets like The Express Tribune, Hindustan Times, Dawn, and Wikipedia's entry on the 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war, the "64 locations effectively targeted by air" claim originates from Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar's official updates. This figure appears to be an aggregate of airstrikes, drone operations, and artillery hits since the operation's launch on February 27, 2026, primarily targeting Afghan Taliban military infrastructure such as brigade headquarters, ammunition depots, checkposts, logistics bases, and terrorist hideouts.

No comprehensive, independently verified list of all 64 specific sites exists—claims remain unconfirmed due to the fog of war, restricted access, and propaganda from both sides. Pakistani sources frame these as precise strikes against Taliban assets supporting cross-border aggression, while Afghan Taliban spokespeople (e.g., Zabihullah Mujahid) counter that many hits targeted civilian areas, mosques, schools, and refugee camps, with minimal military impact. International observers, including the UN and regional analysts, note a lack of third-party verification, and some reports suggest the number may include overlapping or exaggerated counts.

From cross-referenced sources, here's the closest compilation of mentioned targets or affected areas (grouped by province/type for clarity). This draws from progressive updates (e.g., 41 locations by March 2, 46 by March 3, 56 by March 4, up to 64 by March 8). Specific sites are rarely named beyond general descriptions, but patterns emerge:

Key Provinces and Regions Targeted (Afghan Side):

- Kabul Province: Multiple airstrikes on Taliban military offices, corps headquarters (e.g., western outskirts depot), and brigade HQs. Reports of secondary explosions from ammo storage. (Claimed hits: ~5-7 sites, including urban military installations.)

- Kandahar Province: Core Taliban headquarters, brigade HQs, ammunition depots, and logistics bases in the spiritual heartland. Strikes described as "significant damage." (Claimed hits: ~8-10, focusing on southern strongholds.)

- Paktia Province: Taliban battalion HQs, shelters, and launchpads for cross-border attacks. (Claimed hits: ~6-8.)

- Nangarhar Province: Brigade headquarters, ammo depots (e.g., near Jalalabad), and border installations. Early strikes focused here. (Claimed hits: ~7-9.)

- Khost Province: Checkposts, armories, and militant hideouts, including Anzar Sar (disputed capture by Taliban). (Claimed hits: ~5-6.)

- Paktika Province: Border posts and terrorist camps. (Claimed hits: ~4-5.)

- Helmand Province (including Lashkargah area): Military sites and depots. (Claimed hits: ~3-4.)

- Kunar, Laghman, Kunduz, and Other Eastern/Northern Provinces: Scattered strikes on hideouts, posts, and facilities. (Claimed hits: ~10-15 combined, often linked to TTP/ISIS-K camps.)

Border Sectors and Ground Targets (Pak-Afghan Frontier, Often Pakistani-Controlled but Involving Cross-Border Fire):

- Chaman, Noshki, Gudwana, Qila Saifullah, Zhob, Chiltan Ranges, Warsak (in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa sectors). These account for ~15-20 of the 64, focusing on destroyed checkposts (242 claimed overall) and captured positions.

Types of Targets:

- Headquarters and Command Centers: ~15-20 (e.g., brigade/corps HQs in Kabul, Kandahar, Nangarhar).

- Ammunition Depots and Logistics Bases: ~10-15 (causing visible secondary blasts).

- Checkposts and Border Installations: ~20-25 (destroyed or captured).

- Hideouts and Launchpads: ~10-15 (linked to anti-Pakistan militants like TTP).

This list represents a synthesis of Pakistani claims (e.g., from DG ISPR, Tarar, and accounts like @PakistanFauj, @KazmiWajahat), which emphasize military precision, versus Afghan denials of effectiveness and accusations of civilian harm. Journalists like Anas Mallick (@AnasMallick) report specific strikes (e.g., Nangarhar depots), but totals vary. The "closest to reality" is likely an overcount by Pakistan for propaganda, with actual unique targets closer to 40-50 distinct sites across 10-12 provinces, per cross-checked reports. Global calls for de-escalation highlight the risk of broader conflict without verification.

2. Hypothetical Decapitation Strike Analysis

A "decapitation strike" in military terms typically focuses on eliminating leadership and command structures to paralyze an adversary, but your query extends it to fully neutralizing military capabilities by targeting bases, storage depots, and depots across Afghanistan. Under the Taliban (post-2021 takeover), Afghanistan's armed forces are less centralized than the former Afghan National Army, relying on a mix of captured U.S./NATO equipment, Soviet-era gear, and irregular militias. They're organized into 8 corps (e.g., headquarters in Kabul, Kandahar, Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif, Helmand, Kunduz, Laghman, Gardez), with an estimated 165,000-170,000 personnel (including 90,000 local militias).

To hypothetically render Taliban military capabilities "to zero" in today's Afghanistan (as of March 2026), you'd need to strike a broad array of targets: all major command centers, airfields, vehicle/armor depots, ammo storage, fuel sites, and key militia hubs. Based on historical NATO infrastructure (which the Taliban inherited and consolidated), current Taliban structure, and reports on their assets (e.g., Bagram Airfield as a primary hub, Kandahar for southern ops, scattered depots in provinces like Helmand and Nangarhar), I'd estimate 120-180 total high-value targets.

- Breakdown: 8 corps HQs (core decapitation nodes); 10-15 major airbases/airfields (e.g., Bagram, Kandahar, Shindand, Kabul IA, Mazar-i-Sharif); 40-60 bases/outposts (consolidated from ~100 NATO-era sites, now focused in urban/provincial centers); 30-50 depots/storage facilities (ammo, vehicles like 2,000+ captured Humvees/MRAPs, helicopters); 20-30 militia/elite unit hubs (e.g., Badri 313 Battalion sites). This accounts for geographic spread across 34 provinces, but concentrated in 10-15 key ones (e.g., Kabul, Kandahar, Herat).

Pakistan's claimed 64 hits represent about 36-53% of this hypothetical total (64/180 ≈ 36%; 64/120 ≈ 53%). In reality, this would disrupt but not eliminate capabilities, as Taliban forces are decentralized, resilient to strikes (using caves/mountains for storage), and quick to relocate. A full neutralization would require sustained operations beyond a single strike wave, risking high civilian casualties and regional fallout.
AI is not half-bad if you give it properly worded prompts and understand where it can hallucinate, good for parsing through information at least and organising.

Grok believes there to be 120 to 180 strategically significant military sites inside Afghanistan (not to be confused with small tactical border posts but major sites like HQ, bases, ammunition depots, etc).

From our 64 strikes, we probably hit about 50 of those so far. So 2 more weeks of operations minimum is needed.
 
Idk seems like they learned their lesson and are trying to clean all the trash. However there's one person who screams from prison 24/7 and his party openly supports the afghan narrative and all the 10-11 YouTubers are trying their best to make sure the afghan campaign fails.

Also tells me one thing that the generals and institutions are adaptable, willing to change, reorganize and do what is required to protect the interest of the state. Where as that one eyed shit in prison is stupid, stubborn and openly harms the interest of the state.

I will always prioritise the state over any stupid political populist rhetoric. Yes there must be accountability for past failures but eventually we'll get there maybe in 30 years.
What one-eyed military prisoners has to do anything with what TTA is doing to PA? And how one-eyed prisoner habited ttp in agencies?
 
The Afghandus have Indiansbeat with just how much bullshit they throw out, the soldiers in this video can been seen wearing FC Balochistan uniforms and Pakistani flags

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Also look at the tagged accounts they have entire media cell pushing out this bullshit

This retard lives in Pakistan btw
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Whoever started it, what matters is how it dealt with. In any case, I am listening to bob Marley and enjoying life. No point in taking life seriously - it's all one big farce.
 
The Afghan Taliban abandoned their vehicle after being fired upon by Pakistani security forces while patrolling near the Pak-Afghan border at Kurram Sector.

Just look at how fast they ran
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Warriors of Allah Running from Shahdat, meanwhile Angels of Heaven be like...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Enmity with Afghan has already stalled CPEC, all the fanfare is dead.
Roads is not cpec, trade is.
Enmity with Afghan is dangerous. Providing TTA safe heaven and logistics was ill sighted and enmity is same mistake. Army is not fit to negotiate with them.
Who is?
Imran “Afghani is my middle name” Suri?
 
Enmity with Afghan is dangerous.
You don't always choose who you have emnity with. Sometimez war is brought to your doorstep and you either fight back or surrender.

It's like blaming a bullying victim for choosing to get bullied by randoms. Next you'll be saying Palestinians emnity with Israelis is dangerous.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Pakistan destroyed ex NATO base, currently used by TTA in Afghanistan.

This makes me happy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top