Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

[kimjongun]

There are videos of Iranian missiles performing maneuvers within the atmosphere

MaRVs cant manuver much , Fatah is just brute force speed , while emad and all others are liquid fuel missile which iran fires in salvos to overwhelm AD

 

[Falcon26]

Does Pak have missiles which can reach Diego Garcia?

I dont trust the US despite close relations historically with the Pak armed forces. Ultimately zionists rule them and zionists hate Muslims. Need a credible long reach to be able to take out that base.

Pakistani missiles can’t even reach Israel, if we go by publicly stated ranges.

 

[MS Sandhu]

In my opinion, Pakistan missiles are outdated and very limited, Iran is really much more advanced technology than us. Same with North Korea's superior missiles, sorry man

Not an accurate assessment in my opinion.
Both Pakistan and Iran have different operational needs.
Iran needs lo/hi tech mix in large quantities. They fired ~500 MRBMs in june war and ~350 MRBMs in current conflict. Majority of these are really simple ballistic projectiles for optics basically to keep the war going with handful of ( ~50 out of 850 MRBMs) impactful hits.

For Pakistan, India is just next door.Firing 100s of MRBMs on it is Idiotic to say the least when simple dumb bombs with guidance kits can do the job just fine.

For Nuke delivery, we need just handful of high tech missiles equipped with PBV & MIRV technology (50 impactful ones).

 

[Psyko70]

Again same bashing of pakistan capabilities. Pakistan has more options for offense then iran has. All iran has right now is ballistic missiles.

We have a very good air force if not excellent.

Plus, in times of war, we will know the real capabilities of Pakistan ballistic missile tech. Why would Pakistan reveal its true capabilities.

K-4 with 4000km was only revealed a day ago in heavy conflict. Otherwise everyone though they have max 2500km missile.

Plus its cep is too much.

 

[RAMPAGE]

Ok. Let's hear it from you. What makes you assume Iranian missiles are superior?

Check how many Iranian missiles are solid fueled .
How many can carry 1 ton or above .
How many have thrusters or maneuvering fins in the Re entry vehicle?
How many are multi staged ?

I don't remember making any claims about the subject. You made a claim, and I asked you share any justification you may have.

Why does it matter how many solid fuel 'models' Iran has? Not that it's relevant to your claim, but I'm sure it has at least as many units of solid fuelled BMs as we do, or at least it used to until very recently. Iran's stockpile far outnumbers ours.

Again, I'm fairly sure they have produced more missiles capable of carrying warheads weighing one tonne or more. Same goes for solid-fulled multistage missiles and thurster-equipped RVs.

Also, your claim was about quality, not quantity.

 

[kimjongun]

Iranian missiles are in larger quantity which is needed cuz they dont have anyother option. Pak has a lot of other options against its enemies rather then just missiles .
Iranian strategy was to develop large quantity of suitable range missiles that could reach israeli homeland , thus the large numbers of MRBM like emad , ghadar , Kheyber shikan and the newer Fatah .
While Our strategy was establishing deterrence with our main enemy India , Developing a launch vehicle with capability of launching a payload of a ton in weight or more was imp. And with that we increased range and the capabilities .
Nuclear armed countries build missiles regarding to their warhead quantity and designate such class of missiles separately from conventional ones (reason of us building ARFC) .
For people wondering , why doesn't Ranges of our missiles are being increased , It is because we need to look at who are we pointing at , The European countries still think of us as a Nuclear armed Afghanistan and they wont take long before sanctioning our missile program further , or just ploy with the zios to destabilize us further .

 

[kimjongun]

i do believe we need an upgrade in the inventory of our missiles , MaRV and boosted reentry vehicles are needed(fatah) , Apart from all that we seriously need to increase the range of Babur to around a the 1000 km mark , every capable CM in the world is better in range then us .

 

[PakistaniDefender]

View attachment 187192

ramzan ab gayi, sab halaal hogaya

Can you please elaborate how Iran's missiles are superior to us?

 

[PakistaniDefender]

i do believe we need an upgrade in the inventory of our missiles , MaRV and boosted reentry vehicles are needed(fatah) , Apart from all that we seriously need to increase the range of Babur to around a the 1000 km mark , every capable CM in the world is better in range then us .

We need hypersonic cruise missiles with as maximum range as possible so they can hit deep inside India. The way gulfies are easily intercepting the ballistic missiles with high interception rate, I have started to loose confidence on our Fatah 2.

 

[Ibbi32]

iran likely has defacto more advanced missile technology than pakistan. Fatah khoramshar and khebr shikan are very advanced pieces of kit whilst most of pakistans existing strategic missile program is old battle field range missiles. Shaheen III and ababeel are likely on par with most of their arsenal but i believe our own cruise missiles and fatah rockets are far superior than any equivalent they have

 

[kimjongun]

iran likely has defacto more advanced missile technology than pakistan. Fatah khoramshar and khebr shikan are very advanced pieces of kit whilst most of pakistans existing strategic missile program is old battle field range missiles. Shaheen III and ababeel are likely on par with most of their arsenal but i believe our own cruise missiles and fatah rockets are far superior than any equivalent they have

S3 AND ABABEEL are way better then anything iran possses currently in terms of warhead and range.
Kheibr shikan is a SRBM comparable to the Fatah 2 or Shaheen 1A
No iranian CM has DSMAC AND TERCOM
Our strategy is establish nuclear deterrence , not lob 10 emads.

 

[kimjongun]

We need hypersonic cruise missiles with as maximum range as possible so they can hit deep inside India. The way gulfies are easily intercepting the ballistic missiles with high interception rate, I have started to loose confidence on our Fatah 2.

Yall really think Hypersonic cruise missiles halwa hain?
They are most technologically complex weapons even more difficult then ICBMs , HGV are different and HCM are different

 

[Gripen9]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Psyko70]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

That was known in forum or am I mistaken ? It was test range 2750 km ?

But also in forum its discussed about pak missile having heavy components and not lighter composites.

 

[Hopefully Pessimistic]

You have ababeel for that, instead of 3 RVs you can put in Submunition carriers and vola you have an oreshnik.

Payload too small, Ababeel is several areas behind in fuel mixture, diameter, separation mechanism, decoys, etc