Western media does not consistently smear chyina, certain aspects yet but I imagine it's the same in China towards the west.
If anything the talk these days outside of politics is often complimentary and even envy of China, don't try to stir up hatred, it's very easy on this forum to do so, Pakistanis like most other south/south East Asian people very rarely fact check and can go on riots based on fake WhatsApp videos being shared.
As for military pacts...well yeah obviously, US/Russia will always go on the side of whoever is against the other, even if they are enemies.
I no longer want to look for evidence to refute you; I will quote comments from authoritative media in our country. Everyone, take a look at the Western countries' blackening production line.
Looking back at a series of lies about Xinjiang fabricated by the US and Western countries in recent years, and the so-called 'sanctions' imposed on China based on them, it becomes clear that linking Xinjiang cotton to 'forced labor' is still a familiar 'rumor production line' product: first, scholars and think tanks funded by anti-China forces fabricate so-called Xinjiang reports out of thin air; no matter how flawed or alarmist the reports are, mainstream Western media such as the BBC copy and cite them extensively, hyping them up; anti-China organizations fan the flames; politicians use this as a reason to promote sanctions against China...
当前，美西方一场针对中国新疆棉花的闹剧正在上演。有些欧美企业基于所谓“强迫劳动”谎言，声称不用新疆棉花。这些行为的背后，其实是美西方“谣言流水线”的最新操弄。这些声称拒用新疆棉花的企业称，它们的决定是
world.people.com.cn
If there were facts, the government would control information, just like Israel does not allow filming of attacks on Iran. Now China has opened visa-free travel, and many foreign friends have traveled to Xinjiang in China; they have not found so-called forced labor or concentration camps.
So, if this is not blackening, what is the Xinjiang cotton incident?
Since 2012, the BBC has often used the title 'But at what cost?' in positive news reports about China. For example, 'China is creating jobs for Ethiopia, but at what cost?' 'China is becoming smarter, but at what cost?' This title pattern typically first acknowledges China's achievements, then through the rhetorical question leads readers to focus on potential negative impacts or risks, which domestic and foreign netizens have summarized as the BBC's habitual 'blackening tactic.'
I remember the BBC is British media, right? Have you read this type of article?
Authoritative media in our country has never blackened other countries. If you are talking about Prince Andrew attending Epstein's parties in the UK, then that kind of news would not count as blackening, right?
Western countries arbitrarily trample on the bottom line of humanity; shouldn't civilized countries report the facts?
