Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

[Samurai]

Dhruv Rathee's Indian (Congressi) perspective on the Pak-Afghan conflict. He goes on to explain the short history and basically in the end concludes that the whole objective of Pakistan was to create the Taliban and bring them in power in Afghanistan as a buffer strategic depth against India. But those same Taliban have now turned against Pakistan, with TTA giving shelter to TTP, which in turn carries out attacks inside Pakistan and the TTA govt. is forming alliance with India (irony!!!!).

Now Pakistan is stuck in a vicious cycle of conflict and violence with no end in sight unless the fundamental problem with TTP is resolved (whether through talks or direct kinetic action).

Is video pay 6M views la kar is banday nay theek thak $$$ bana liye. Socho yahi same talking points agar hum may say PDF say koi bana kar upload karke bana deta

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[hasssanali8998]

Pakistani border troops have successfully shot down an armed drone operated by the Afghan T@liban.

 

[Starlord]

Is video pay 6M views la kar is banday nay theek thak $$$ bana liye. Socho yahi same talking points agar hum may say PDF say koi bana kar upload karke bana deta

he has Millions of followers on his Youtube, there is not a single Pakistani youtuber that has that much reach, so it won't happen. India has a massive domestic audience that gives their youtubers views in 1000's and even in millions, while most of Pakistani's don't even watch their own youtubers.

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Samurai]

he has Millions of followers on his Youtube, there is not a single Pakistani youtuber that has that much reach, so it won't happen. India has a massive domestic audience that gives their youtubers views in 1000's and even in millions, while most of Pakistani's don't even watch their own youtubers.

Correct, and for an Indian to get huge views/audience on Youtube video you just have to mention the name of Pakistan and put some image of it.

 

[Starlord]

Correct, and for an Indian to get huge views/audience on Youtube video you just have to mention the name of Pakistan and put some image of it.

His video on this topic as shitty as it can get, lots of inaccuracies but who cares? there is not a single Indian Youtuber right now besides maybe Parvin guy, that has some neutral view of Pakistan, most of them are filthy scum and anti Pakistan down to their core. Just check our part where he mentioned the Oct skirmish he said Pakistan lost around 23 soldiers while Afghan's losing only 8-9, yeah right buddy. Plus he forgot to mention that America/KSA was involved in creation of Taliban, also he forgot to mention the Indian Involvement with TTP and now Taliban, India operates 10+ consulate in Afghanistan during Karzai Govt, there is mounting evidence of Indians providing money and weapon support to BLA/TTP which he mentioned, in last he said Pakistan wanted Friendlier Afghanistan as Strategic depth and to be used against India? Bitch world doesn't revolve around India, Taliban was created/funded/trained to fight Soviets. But trust me lots of Indians will believe his BS as blind leading blind, in Indian case, Chutiya leading hoards of other Chutiya's.

 

[ghazi52]

Pakistan presents three key demands in Urumqi talks​

Kabul told to declare TTP terror outfit, dismantle it and prove it

Kamran Yousaf
April 06, 2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has conveyed three core demands to the Afghan Taliban during the talks that have been under way in Urumqi, as China, which brokered the latest round, is trying to convince both sides to agree on a five-point framework to resolve issues.

The three demands put forward by Islamabad at the outset, include Kabul formally declare the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) a terrorist organisation, dismantle its infrastructure, and provide verifiable proof of the action.

These demands form the basis of Pakistan's negotiating position, which sources say has hardened amid persistent security concerns.

The Foreign Office has so far only issued an initial statement confirming that talks are taking place in Urumqi, without offering further details on the agenda or progress.

At the last weekly briefing, Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said Pakistan's participation in the talks being held in Urumqi should not be construed as any shift in policy, particularly regarding ongoing security operations.

"There is no material change to ongoing Operation Ghazab Lil Haq that I mentioned last week," the spokesperson added.

 

[ghazi52]

On Sunday Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi acknowledged the dialogue was still under way and that the Taliban regime wanted to resolve issues with Pakistan through talks.

Sources said China has been playing a quiet but active role through sustained shuttle diplomacy, with its Special Envoy for Afghanistan Yue Xiaoyong engaging both Islamabad and Kabul in recent months to narrow differences and bring them to the negotiating table.

Pakistan has also made it clear that the scope of the talks will remain limited to counterterrorism and border security, ruling out any broader political engagement at this stage.

The sources say the focus is on addressing Islamabad's concerns over terrorist groups operating from Afghan territory and ensuring mechanisms to prevent cross-border attacks.

 

[ghazi52]

It is believed that a framework is under discussion that could pave the way for a possible understanding between the two sides. The proposed roadmap includes a ceasefire arrangement, counterterrorism assurances from the Afghan Taliban, dismantling of terror sanctuaries inside Afghanistan, and measures to facilitate secure trade routes.

It also envisages the establishment of a more structured and institutionalised dialogue mechanism between Islamabad and Kabul.

Both sides have sent technical-level delegations to Urumqi, reflecting the operational nature of the discussions.

Pakistan's team is led by Syed Ali Asad Gilani, Additional Secretary at the Foreign Office responsible for Afghanistan and West Asia, and includes officials from defence and intelligence agencies.

The Afghan Taliban delegation is headed by Mohibullah Waseq, Chief of Staff to Amir Khan Muttaqi, and includes representatives from the foreign ministry, interior ministry, defence ministry, and intelligence directorate.

 

[ghazi52]

Although preliminary engagements have begun, the sources said Chinese officials are holding separate meetings with each side to bridge gaps before moving towards direct, structured negotiations.

The choice of Urumqi as the venue is seen as significant, given its location in China's Xinjiang region, where Beijing has longstanding concerns about militancy linked to groups such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), whose fighters are believed to have a presence in Afghanistan.

Diplomatic observers say the talks represent a cautious but important effort to stabilise Pakistan-Afghanistan ties, though major differences remain and any breakthrough would depend on Kabul's willingness to address Islamabad's core security demands.

 

[ghazi52]

Pakistan questions UN experts over TTP presence in Afghanistan, cites multiple reports​

Islamabad refers to the 35th, 36th, 16th and 37th UN Security Council monitoring team reports

APP
April 05, 2026

Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan militants. PHOTO: REUTERS

Pakistan on Sunday questioned the position of United Nations human rights experts regarding the lack of “credible evidence” linking the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) attacks to Afghan soil, pointing to multiple UN and international reports that documented the presence and activities of terrorist groups operating from Afghanistan.

Last month, the UN experts had urged Pakistan and Afghanistan to commit to a permanent ceasefire and had also claimed that Pakistan had not published credible evidence that TTP attacks within its territory were directed or controlled by the de facto Afghan authorities.

The experts had called on the parties to respect international human rights law and international humanitarian law, including the protection of civilians and civilian objects.

They called for prompt, independent and transparent investigations of all alleged violations, accountability for perpetrators, and remedies for victims, in line with international standards.

 

[Sparten]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

**** me thats a dangerous looking bird.

 

[Master Chief]

Pakistan presents three key demands in Urumqi talks​

Kabul told to declare TTP terror outfit, dismantle it and prove it

Kamran Yousaf
April 06, 2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has conveyed three core demands to the Afghan Taliban during the talks that have been under way in Urumqi, as China, which brokered the latest round, is trying to convince both sides to agree on a five-point framework to resolve issues.

The three demands put forward by Islamabad at the outset, include Kabul formally declare the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) a terrorist organisation, dismantle its infrastructure, and provide verifiable proof of the action.

These demands form the basis of Pakistan's negotiating position, which sources say has hardened amid persistent security concerns.

The Foreign Office has so far only issued an initial statement confirming that talks are taking place in Urumqi, without offering further details on the agenda or progress.

At the last weekly briefing, Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said Pakistan's participation in the talks being held in Urumqi should not be construed as any shift in policy, particularly regarding ongoing security operations.

"There is no material change to ongoing Operation Ghazab Lil Haq that I mentioned last week," the spokesperson added.

We should reject any ceasefire, any talks of ceasefire, any framework for ceasefire. China has done what it needed to do in a public facing sense - I am presuming this is all simple optics.

Now we should get back to striking the Kabulites without respite. There is no peaceful solution and there never will be. Their regime needs eradicating.

 

[CynicalPakistaniCritic]

Dhruv Rathee's Indian (Congressi) perspective on the Pak-Afghan conflict. He goes on to explain the short history and basically in the end concludes that the whole objective of Pakistan was to create the Taliban and bring them in power in Afghanistan as a buffer strategic depth against India. But those same Taliban have now turned against Pakistan, with TTA giving shelter to TTP, which in turn carries out attacks inside Pakistan and the TTA govt. is forming alliance with India (irony!!!!).

Now Pakistan is stuck in a vicious cycle of conflict and violence with no end in sight unless the fundamental problem with TTP is resolved (whether through talks or direct kinetic action).

Is video pay 6M views la kar is banday nay theek thak $$$ bana liye. Socho yahi same talking points agar hum may say PDF say koi bana kar upload karke bana deta

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

As someone who has been following the Afghanistan-Pakistan situation since at least 2015 when Pakistanis would cheer the Taliban and suck-up to Afghans that would insult them, ironically this Indian probably has it more correct than most Pakistanis but still off.

For some reason, most of these analysts are still ignoring the elephant in the room here, and I'm not sure why. The Taliban, is of course a terrorist group, but it misses the fundamental motives & reasoning behind its actions and why it is so belligerent against Pakistanis. Afghan society has long had claims and desired to establish something called Loy Afghanistan (Greater Afghanistan) which means annexing 2 of Pakistan's provinces, KP and Balochistan through hook or crook. It also has an old historical racial supremacy complex over "Punjabis", which pushes it to its more violent form of belligerence, that's almost genocidal. It believes it is their inherent right all must fight for to the death, no matter how many must die.

Essentially, no ceasefire is going to last and it's foolish to think a ceasefire is an actual solution, it's kicking the can of conflict down the road. Such mindsets can only be resolved through giving them the satisfaction of conflict that they want. Usually requiring humiliation before giving up.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

As someone who has been following the Afghanistan-Pakistan situation since at least 2015 when Pakistanis would cheer the Taliban and suck-up to Afghans that would insult them, ironically this Indian probably has it more correct than most Pakistanis but still off.

For some reason, most of these analysts are still ignoring the elephant in the room here, and I'm not sure why. The Taliban, is of course a terrorist group, but it misses the fundamental motives & reasoning behind its actions and why it is so belligerent against Pakistanis. Afghan society has long had claims and desired to establish something called Loy Afghanistan (Greater Afghanistan) which means annexing 2 of Pakistan's provinces, KP and Balochistan through hook or crook. It also has an old historical racial supremacy complex over "Punjabis", which pushes it to its more violent form of belligerence, that's almost genocidal. It believes it is their inherent right all must fight for to the death, no matter how many must die.

Essentially, no ceasefire is going to last and it's foolish to think a ceasefire is an actual solution, it's kicking the can of conflict down the road. Such mindsets can only be resolved through giving them the satisfaction of conflict that they want. Usually requiring humiliation before giving up.

There is a WAY Pakistan can end the afghan problem once and for all if it was serious but I will probably get banned for saying it here.

"afghans" and "racial supremacy" are two MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE events.