Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Interesting, and does that mean that Israel will now try to assassinate Shabaz, or Munir for "facilitating" a ceasefire that is against strategic Israeli interests ?
I think your question is tongue in cheek but anyway, they wouldn't dare. Pakistan has demonstrated its capabilities to publicly outmanouevre the exceptionally amateurish Israeli-Indian "happy family" nexus. They yap too much. Pakistan has played a quiet game of leverage.

We already knew Tel Aviv was a bitter enemy of ours because of their miitary logistics alliance with India. They cannot do much else to us AS LONG AS they don't get a foothold in Iran. So we do have partly selfish reasons for helping the Tehran regime. So be it.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Emerati and Indians have lost their voices due to their mutual pain.
hope they suffer for long.
 
I wasn't wrong, it seems. Trump says that the Chinese convinced the Iranians to accept the ceasefire.

So, the vetoes of Russia and China weren't a coincidence as I said. It was an exchange for Iran's surrender to the US ceasefire.

If you think China should not mediate the Iran War, what do you think China should do? Declare war on the United States and initiate WW3?

You need to understand that the UAE can build a canal to avoid the strait, and Saudi Arabia can pull Pakistan into the battlefield. If these two situations occur, Iran will really fall into the abyss.

We will temporarily cease hostilities and use the intact China Iran railway to stockpile military supplies for two weeks. Beneficial for the ceasefire agreement to stop attacking US bases and provide Arab countries with a reason not to join the war. This is in line with Iran's interests.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

if not israel, then its wanna be minions. I suggest holding the ceasefire, replenish missiles and its fuels meanwhile.
Also, I am not sure if the US is the party even if the UAE is attacked? as Iran is having a ceasefire with the US. So, Iran can attack UAE but not the US installations there.a
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
1775648324220.png
I swear only Asim Munir and Zohran Mamdani(from opponjent party to trump) got the charisma to get trump to talk like this because GODDAMN
 
Said it for the last 15 years bro and got told off by people not to hurt their 'strategic brother', the same one who gifted Modi a state medal when he crushed the Kashmiris.
I'm glad Pakistanis finally woke up.
Bro

Iran is our neighbor - our national anthem is in Persian - historical connections. We have to stick our neck out. If we didnt - we would be next - the behavior of some of these Arbee states - incredible. I know there is remittance and obviously we have the Saudi links but ffs their behavior and language - next level especially the UAE.........
 
To be honest , China is the only country we won't mind giving them a base on the mediterranean ..
Hahaha, thank you.

We currently have no plans to establish bases in other countries.

If there is a need to establish a base, it is more likely to be a support base, which would require negotiation between two countries.

The mission nature of the base should be the same as the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Support Base in Djibouti. This base would host a maximum of 800 troops.

The main responsibilities of the Djibouti support base are to provide logistical support for escort missions in the Gulf of Aden, African peacekeeping, and humanitarian relief tasks, participate in joint exercises and training, evacuate and protect citizens, and maintain the security of international strategic routes.

In 2024 and 2025, the Chinese military and the Djibouti military conducted multiple joint exercises, with the main focus on joint counter-terrorism.

Here is an interesting story about the Chinese military.

The United Nations provides condoms for peacekeeping forces. When the first batch of Chinese peacekeeping troops carried out their mission, the UN, in accordance with routine practice, provided condoms to the Chinese peacekeeping forces. Since our military does not allow such behavior, and because most Chinese people are conservative and traditional, we viewed it as an insult. Later, these condoms were taken back to China or given to other countries’ forces.

In the 30 years that the Chinese military has participated in peacekeeping operations, there have been no violations of laws or regulations, nor have they harmed local civilians. All military personnel participating in peacekeeping missions have been awarded the United Nations Peacekeeping Medal.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Ghalibaf and Vance should talk face to face, rather Pakistan running around between the rooms as the messenger.
 
I would also add that the gulfi arabs and israelis are also some of the biggest lovers. Iran is MUCH MUCH more powerful than all the gulfis combined and the project for a "greater israel" has been delt a powerful blow.

Yep, however I would categorize the GCC countries in groups. They all do not have same agenda. They have differences in their agendas and foreign policies.

Group1: Oman, Qatar:

These countries always try for mediation and genuinely wanted no military action on Iran. Israel is very anti-Qatar, it even attacked Qatar not so long ago. Israel has always accused Qatar for funding Hamas. Oman maybe even at side of Iran as far as strait is concerned.

Group2: KSA:
Its defence strategic alliance is always with United States. However, slowly it has started to diverse with Pakistan and perhaps will try to get some Chinese hardware & partnerships without getting eyebrows raised at Washington.

Group3: Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain.
These countries are overwhelmingly linked with US based strategic architecture, two are abraham accord members. Bahrain had a US 5th fleet Naval HQs. Kuwait was used for HIMARs attacks on Iran, Kuwaiti airspace was constantly used (F-15s instance proved that). Also this Group 3 is more closely aligned with Israel & India.

So, I think Group 1 wouldn't be too much concerned and might be actually happy for the way things are ended. KSA wouldn't be extremely bothered too. Group3 might be very concerned for new status quo and may feel insecure the way things are heading.
 
Bro

Iran is our neighbor - our national anthem is in Persian - historical connections. We have to stick our neck out. If we didnt - we would be next - the behavior of some of these Arbee states - incredible. I know there is remittance and obviously we have the Saudi links but ffs their behavior and language - next level especially the UAE.........
we wouldve been internally destabalized not exacrtly an overt military action becaudse we can actually erase tel aviv from the map.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


This is not looking good for Israel and GCC

Issue is trumpy is deranged and a serial liar. Any deal with US needs wider US political support through Congress i guess?

Also I can't see Iran giving up enrichment, it may freeze if US accepts sanctions relief. And missile tech development shouldn't even be on list of things to discuss its the only effective defence Iran has.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top