Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Taimoor]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Was reading Al jazeera. Those Iranian plans might be carrying some captive Americans in Iranian jails. Iran might use as good will gesture.

 

[mangekyo]

Yes I would. It's called realpolitik.

I’m not convinced you would. But if true, you’re at least being consistent. I would never support such a move from Iran btw. Guess we’re just different

 

[hasn2009]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Master Chief]

How is it inaccurate?

I explained clearly how it is inaccurate.

In your analogy, would Iran also be hosting a peace summit for the belligerent parties?

There is plenty of context missing from your statements.

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Goenitz]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

My hunch is that the talks will fail (80%) unless the US get something big out of it. JD Vance wouldn't want to look weak, or he can't be in a presidential race. He will act tough, no matter what Iran presents.
Also, as Iran is not losing (maximilius), the US cannot accept most of its points. If Iran opens the Strait, the US will ask for more anyway, which would fail the negotiations. So, nobody will back down first.

Therefore, the talks will stall first, some point will be renegotiated, and then it will be successful. Trump cannot gamble this anymore. He wants to look successful in the upcoming visit to China, in front of MAGA and NATO.

 

[r3alist]

What exactly is not clear? You’re sending millitary forces to a country that is participating in a war against us. This is while we are your guests. Obviously I am not going it celebrate it.

How much "military force" exactly, what do you know exactly to be true and what is its purpose?

You don't know what you are upset about, yet remain persistent in this specific detail, out of everything else going on
You are foolish if you cannot see that those who wish bad for Iran are trying to exaggerate and sensationalize the Pakistan Saudi defence agreement, and it seems to be working

So if you cannot determine what might just be normal type of events but want to translate it into something to be offended about this is on you

 

[mangekyo]

I explained clearly how it is inaccurate.

In your analogy, would Iran also be hosting a peace summit for the belligerent parties?

There is plenty of context missing from your statements.

How does that change anything?

 

[r3alist]

This seems significant

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Falgrine]

I’m not convinced you would. But if true, you’re at least being consistent. I would never support such a move from Iran btw. Guess we’re just different

As i wrote brother, we have our own compulsions. This is the fruit of our criminal negligence to strengthen our economy which we continue to reap.

Ofcourse, Mecca and Medina are not threatened a single bit by our Muslim Iranian brothers. This is just emotional black mailing propaganda that Saudis do to decieve our illiterate populace.

We dont have cash and we need some quick bucks to run the country that Saudi family is regularly giving us. Which is ironically nothing more than a little pocket change for them.

 

[HAIDER]

My hunch is that the talks will fail (80%) unless the US get something big out of it. JD Vance wouldn't want to look weak, or he can't be in a presidential race. Also, as Iran is losing, so the US cannot accept its all or most of its points. If Iran open the Strait, the US will ask more anyway, which would fail the negotiation. So, nobody will back down first.

Therefore, the talks will stall first, some point will be renegotiated, and then it will be successful. Trump cannot gamble this anymore. He wants to look successful in the upcoming visit to China, in front of MAGA and the NATO.

Only JD is serious, Kushner and Witkoff are non serious . Talks may fail or JD adopt neutral posture. Trump already fired 8 top Generals who are against this war.

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Taimoor]

What exactly is not clear? You’re sending millitary forces to a country that is participating in a war against us. This is while we are your guests. Obviously I am not going it celebrate it.

There is another angle to it, the proximity of airbase where PAF assets are deployed in Saudi, is close to UAE. There is a strong chance they are there to keep an eye on this outpost of Zionists. UAE is going ape shit over US-Iran talks.

 

[hasn2009]

This seems significant

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Is that even his real account?