Psyko70
Trusted Member
I think its quite fascinating that we understand that our enemy is richer, stronger and heavier in terms of force. However, I would suggest we dont make it a fashion just to look cool that we talk like we are just sitting without pants on.
Pakistan military has changed a lot and improved. SSBN or not we have way better navy than whatever that was in 71. We have new rocket force, while there is claim we have quantity less than 50 for each type of missile, this is pure stupidity to say.
If anyone claims that he knows someone in higher ranks (retired or not) and he/she says he knows about this and that. First of all that is a treason to even talk about openly in a forum where 90% viewers are guest from Everywhere. So I believe 10% of what is true and what is not.
We did well in 19 and 25 and yet people talk like all was failure, which is false a lie you want to showoff with.
If we did poor US would not have come to save India. If it was other way around US would have had never intervened.
its just not about how many target got hit, but which blow had the meanest blow.
Pakistan military has changed a lot and improved. SSBN or not we have way better navy than whatever that was in 71. We have new rocket force, while there is claim we have quantity less than 50 for each type of missile, this is pure stupidity to say.
If anyone claims that he knows someone in higher ranks (retired or not) and he/she says he knows about this and that. First of all that is a treason to even talk about openly in a forum where 90% viewers are guest from Everywhere. So I believe 10% of what is true and what is not.
We did well in 19 and 25 and yet people talk like all was failure, which is false a lie you want to showoff with.
If we did poor US would not have come to save India. If it was other way around US would have had never intervened.
its just not about how many target got hit, but which blow had the meanest blow.




