Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

People dont tend to understand here how much the US tries to moniter your nuclear sites
Google earth has been literally clicking an image of a site for 2 years straight with a gap of only 2 days in between its like you can tell a lot .. but this probably known by the SPD and others and thus the tarpaulins and other stuff
 
Last edited:
People dont tend to udnerstand here how much the US tries to minter your nuclear sites
Google earth has been literally clicking an image of a site for 2 years straight with a gap of only 2 days in between its like you can tell a lot ... i wont name the site their is one thing in noticed in the imagery (open to the public) is a new missile idk but the fins looks very diffierent should i post the cutout of the screenshot here?
Please do, if it’s already out in the open.
 
Please do, if it’s already out in the open.
its like sitting in the open for quite some time like 2y but if the mods feel like its too much or is INFOSEC or OPSEC invading then delte my post.
IDK if its a missile or what , has two sets of tail fins , its quite big tho
new thingy.PNG
 
its like sitting in the open for quite some time like 2y but if the mods feel like its too much or is INFOSEC or OPSEC invading then delte my post.
IDK if its a missile or what , has two sets of tail fins , its quite big tho
View attachment 193737
Similar layout to Fatah-2 but much larger. Or it could be an artifact of low res image.
 
Similar layout to Fatah-2 but much larger. Or it could be an artifact of low res image.
could be but its much larger like compared to a container truck its huge , S2/3 size
 
its like sitting in the open for quite some time like 2y but if the mods feel like its too much or is INFOSEC or OPSEC invading then delte my post.
IDK if its a missile or what , has two sets of tail fins , its quite big tho
View attachment 193737
Its just the trailer portion of a TEL minus the tractor and prior to missile compartment being put on. You probably got this from the NDC Fateh Jhang site, since that's where the TEL integration happens.
 
Its just the trailer portion of a TEL minus the tractor and prior to missile compartment being put on. You probably got this from the NDC Fateh Jhang site, since that's where the TEL integration happens.
Could be , but its a lil prior to the fatah jhang site
 
Could be , but its a lil prior to the fatah jhang site
Maybe you mean the Jindar site. There's continous earth works on these two, so it could be construction related, pillars or something.. In any case the last thing you will find lying about outside would be a munition/ even a decomissioned one. The raw materials all take shape under the large sheds/ workshops.
 
so jf 17 mostly unsung hero in 2025 . we underestimated its role. i dbt know about other but i certainly underestimated thunders
Thunders conducted SEAD on s-400 and raids in IOK. They were the backbone of paf operations and more important than j-10s in may
 
Maybe you mean the Jindar site. There's continous earth works on these two, so it could be construction related, pillars or something.. In any case the last thing you will find lying about outside would be a munition/ even a decomissioned one. The raw materials all take shape under the large sheds/ workshops.
jindar is all underground , their is literally nothing on the outisde of the two jindar facilities , Continuous earth work toh bht pe chl rha lol
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This is such a buthurt acc , keeps deleting comments and shits about the taimoor . nigga said Babur and the raad are the same missiles , sea was calm so fail test , etc etc a guy .
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This is such a buthurt acc , keeps deleting comments and shits about the taimoor . nigga said Babur and the raad are the same missiles , sea was calm so fail test , etc etc a guy .


One thing that is intriguing is that taimoor did come in high for its impact. Its not even aided by any terminal manuvers like popup attack.A modern sea skimming missile that relies on low altitude like mm40 for example flies much lower for impact closer to waterline. This is obviously nothing substantial to speak on as we dont know navys testing conditions and full capabilities of missiles but considering in general that taimoor is based off nuclear capable raad 2 i have confidence in its ability to penetrate AD reliably
 
One thing that is intriguing is that taimoor did come in high for its impact. Its not even aided by any terminal manuvers like popup attack.A modern sea skimming missile that relies on low altitude like mm40 for example flies much lower for impact closer to waterline. This is obviously nothing substantial to speak on as we dont know navys testing conditions and full capabilities of missiles but considering in general that taimoor is based off nuclear capable raad 2 i have confidence in its ability to penetrate AD reliably
Yes , this channel is just buzzwords , aerospace buzzwords , corny humour , buzzwords and some cheeky english . a guy is correcting him a lot but dude is just deleting his comment to not just loose his repo ..kher aise bht milenge so just ignore ig.
Wese a taimorr fired alone is just asking to be intercepted we need something like quick sink or Azb81 lr in large numbers
 
Yes , this channel is just buzzwords , aerospace buzzwords , corny humour , buzzwords and some cheeky english . a guy is correcting him a lot but dude is just deleting his comment to not just loose his repo ..kher aise bht milenge so just ignore ig.
Wese a taimorr fired alone is just asking to be intercepted we need something like quick sink or Azb81 lr in large numbers

Entirely different weapons bro. You don’t fire quicksink at the targets that require a taimoor unless as some sort of decoy but even then whilst generally a useful weapon theres alternatives there as well. Azb 81 is a 250lb bomb bro it wont do anything to a warship considering quick sink is not a very precise weapon. Us uses mostly mk83 and mk84 for a reason. Taimoors main advantage is a sea sultan can fire a couple of them to a vessel as far as sri lanka and have minimal chance of getting intercepted in the process. Taimoors long range is a detterence factor. My main problem is i dont see navy acquiring them in any large numbers given budgetery constraints. Theoretically most of the r&d burden fell on spd and afsc when they made raad but i aiui navys just invested in too many systems. Getting an export customer for weapons like smash and taimoor can do wonders for lowering per unit prices and making production less artisian. But navy has done good job collaborating and turning primarily army (F2) and airforce (taimoor) weapons into anti ship weapons in such a short amount of time
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top