1. Input Data
Güçhan (as announced at SAHA EXPO):
- Thrust: 42,000 lbf (with afterburner)
- Bypass ratio (BPR): 0.68
- Airflow: ~420 lb/s
- Diameter: ~46.5"
- Developer: MSB ARGE (MoND R&D Center)
- Status: 6 prototypes, qualification — 2026
F110-GE-129 (for comparison):
- Afterburning thrust: ~29,000 lbf
- Dry thrust: ~17,000 lbf
- Airflow: ~270 lb/s
- Diameter: ~46.5"
- Length: ~4.62 m
- BPR: 0.76
- OPR: ~30
Note on status: 42,000 lbf is the program's target figure, not yet confirmed on the test stand. Everything below concerns design origin, not a confirmed result.
2. Base Equation and Framing the Question
Turbofan thrust, to first approximation:
F ≈ ṁ_air × Fs
where ṁ_air is mass airflow, Fs is specific thrust (lbf per lb/s).
Güçhan's gain over the F110-GE-129:
42,000 / 29,000 = 1.45 → +45%
This +45% must be obtained through one of two factors: an increase in Fs (cycle quality) or an increase in ṁ_air (airflow). We check both.
3. Specific Thrust: The Cycle Is NOT Improved
Fs(F110) = 29,000 / 270 ≈ 107 lbf/(lb/s)
Fs(Güçhan) = 42,000 / 420 ≈ 100 lbf/(lb/s)
Güçhan's Fs is ~6.5% lower. For comparison — Fs of P&W fifth-generation engines (F119/F135) ≈ 115–130. Güçhan is nowhere near that bracket.
Conclusion 3. Güçhan's gas-dynamic cycle, in terms of refinement, is at the F110 level or slightly below — not at the F119/F135 level. No thrust gain was obtained through specific thrust. This rules out the version "the Turks made an F135-class hotter/more efficient cycle."
4. Airflow: The Entire Gain Is Here
Since Fs did not increase, the entire thrust gain is in ṁ_air:
ṁ_air(F110) = 270 lb/s
ṁ_air(Güçhan) = 420 lb/s
420 / 270 = 1.556 → +55.6%
Cross-check via thrust: 270 × 107 ≈ 28,900 lbf (F110, consistent). 420 × 100 = 42,000 lbf (Güçhan, consistent). The balance closes on airflow.
Conclusion 4. The source of all of Güçhan's added thrust is an increase in mass airflow of ~55%. This is not an "improvement" of the F110; it is the F110 scaled up by airflow.
5. Geometry: +55% Airflow Requires Physical Growth
Mass airflow:
ṁ_air = ρ × A × V
ρ — inlet density (set by flight altitude/speed, not controlled by the designer), V — axial flow velocity, A — fan flow-path area.
V cannot be raised: axial velocity in the fan/LPC is already near the gas-dynamic limit; increasing it leads to stall and choking (tip Mach number → 1). The margin is single-digit percent, not tens of percent.
Therefore the +55% in ṁ_air is realized through A:
A_Güçhan / A_F110 ≈ 1.55
D ~ √A → D_Güçhan / D_F110 ≈ √1.55 ≈ 1.24
A ~24% increase in working fan diameter is required.
Check whether this can be hidden within an unchanged external envelope through "tight packaging." On the F110, with ~46.5" external diameter, the working fan diameter is ~40" (the radius gives up ~3.25" to casing wall + structural frame + radial tip clearance). Packaging measures (thinner wall, minimal clearance, dense frame) can realistically reclaim ~0.5–0.8" per side → ~1–1.6" in diameter →
+3…5% of working diameter. The requirement is +24%.
Conclusion 5. Packaging measures close only ~3–5% of the required 24%. The rest is physical growth. Güçhan's external fan-section diameter is almost certainly larger than the F110's; the "46.5"" in sources is likely a rounding or a mounting/interface dimension, not the fan diameter. "Tight packaging" as an explanation for the gain is untenable: packaging does not create airflow.
6. What a Larger Fan Drags Along With It
A larger fan and +55% airflow cascade into requirements for:
- Compressor: rework for the increased flow, otherwise stall / stage mismatch. Consistent with the official wording about a "different pressure ratio." Stage count / stage loading likely changed.
- Combustor: proportionally greater mass flow → larger combustor volume.
- Turbine: greater gas flow → larger turbine; increased work → higher heat-resistance requirements (see Section 7).
- Length: added/resized compressor stages + larger combustor + larger turbine → axial dimension grows. A gas generator for 420 lb/s is longer than one for 270 lb/s.
Conclusion 6. Güçhan is not an F110 modification but a larger engine of the same design school. It grew both in fan-section diameter and in length. This is not a "reworked F110" — it is a new engine in the F110 architecture.
7. The Hot Section: Where the Turks' Own Work Is
Scaling by airflow yields thrust, but the turbine, under the increased work, requires heat resistance. Here are the indigenous technologies (official, per the statement of the MoND R&D Center director):
- Single-crystal turbine blades — indigenous production. Elimination of grain boundaries → higher metal operating temperature, creep resistance, service life. A top-tier technological barrier; a narrow global club (USA, UK, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, China).
- EB-PVD thermal barrier coatings — a separate contract for a next-generation coating. Columnar structure, low thermal conductivity, thermal-cycling resistance. Allows gas temperature above the melting point of the substrate metal.
- Blisk (integrally bladed rotor) — a one-piece "blades + disk" construction without dovetail attachment. Visible on photos of Güçhan's fan: wide-chord blades, low blade count, integral transition into the hub. The F110 of the late 1970s uses dovetail attachment; the blisk is the next generation.
Conclusion 7. Thrust gain — through airflow (scaling). Heat resistance for that airflow — through indigenous single crystals + TBC. This closes the units that were "foreign" in the F110 license.
8. Confirmation from Photographic Material
What is visible in photos of Güçhan vs F110 (qualitatively; exact dimensions cannot be extracted from photos due to perspective):
- Güçhan's fan — wide-chord, low blade count, integral transition into the hub (blisk). The F110 — more blades, narrower chord, dovetail attachment. The cold section is reworked, not inherited.
- Güçhan's fan section is large relative to the gas generator — "bulged" more than the F110's. Consistent with the calculated growth of fan area A (Section 5).
- The engine is elongated, with an extended mid-section. Consistent with a reworked/lengthened compressor (Section 6).
- Round variable nozzle, exposed external plumbing — the GE-school signature (F110), not P&W (the F119 has a 2D nozzle, concealed plumbing).
Conclusion 8. The photos do not contradict the calculated reconstruction and confirm it qualitatively: a larger modern fan, a lengthened gas generator, the GE school.