Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

If they had no use the Americans would have stopped using tomahawks a long time ago.
The tomohawks are very modern
Sytems. They use updates sat imagery to create way point guidance and large salvos to prevent interception.
The Indian western hemisphere is made up of flat areas which is easy for radars to scan as compared to irani or Iraqi mountains.
 
The tomohawks are very modern
Sytems. They use updates sat imagery to create way point guidance and large salvos to prevent interception.
The Indian western hemisphere is made up of flat areas which is easy for radars to scan as compared to irani or Iraqi mountains.


This is also makes it very easy to track for Indian radars and Isaac ..
It works both ways
 
This is also makes it very easy to track for Indian radars and Isaac ..
It works both ways
it wont be easy , the curvature fo earth would be still at play . And radars are not just red circles of detection , they have a varrying coverage .

It all comes down to how these missiles will be employed , what way points they will use , will their be salvos or timing differences so multiple vector reach at the same time? , they can also fire the missiles from up north to use the terrain better? who knows?
 
Slow flying non-Stealthy standard cruise missiles might not have the same usefulness it had 20-15 years ago.

Modern AD with AESA sensors are too good for these things. Unless you have something as stealthy as JASSM.

Just my personal opinion.

Harbah NG is far more LO than original babur aiui. Fwik both Raad/Harbah family have actively been designed with much higher manuverability and low radar signature in mind that nirbhay doesnt have
 
JF17 is C++, not C according to all commentary I have seen.

F-35 Coding standards : https://www.stroustrup.com/JSF-AV-rules.pdf




There is very little reason to use C these days and this has been the case for some time when you have C++ available.
Yes and I never implied C explicity - just the language series.

C++ was the standard back in 2011 with some old timers insisting on C# for reasons unknown for some projects, but the JF-17 was developed on C++.

Most projects we worked on were a combination of C++ and then a bit of memory and algorithm cycle usage optimization for fixed point chipsets.
 
it wont be easy , the curvature fo earth would be still at play . And radars are not just red circles of detection , they have a varrying coverage .

It all comes down to how these missiles will be employed , what way points they will use , will their be salvos or timing differences so multiple vector reach at the same time? , they can also fire the missiles from up north to use the terrain better? who knows?
In his harping Indian systems defy physics.
 
The tomohawks are very modern
Sytems. They use updates sat imagery to create way point guidance and large salvos to prevent interception.
The Indian western hemisphere is made up of flat areas which is easy for radars to scan as compared to irani or Iraqi mountains.
Actually ,it makes it easy to scan over flat lands only if you have top down looking AESA radars that accurately track moving objects against ground clutter.

Funny enough, the same flat land Indian western half is actually beneficial for exactly this type of slow moving cruise missile.

You can literally fly few meters above ground, and with modern powerful embedded systems and sharp contrast capable IR and Visual imaging solutions, you can have a pre-programmed flight path and use real time images to recognize any potential obstacles in the way.

For example, Babur is launch east towards India, it will fly mostly over flat desert or crop fields. But along the way it is possible a telecom tower, a building or transmission line appears. You can use the images to guide the missile around.......and remember it can do that only if it is relatively slow moving. Tracking such a missile would be very hard, if you are flying 3-4 meters above land, pretty much all your long range radars are useless since then they would be not able to scan anything above.

Only way to counter such a missile flying in tracks is by utilizing multiple short range radars which are barely 1 meter above ground and tracking and feeding that information in a central network. But such radars will always be short range tracking capable, like 20-50km, so you will need a lot of them.
 
Yrrr ya rocket force command ka wiki kis ny edit kia tha bc fatah 4 ko hd-1 pr based likah hua tha yrr thori to research kr lia kro abi ja kr thik kia ha
 
Yrrr ya rocket force command ka wiki kis ny edit kia tha bc fatah 4 ko hd-1 pr based likah hua tha yrr thori to research kr lia kro abi ja kr thik kia ha
why is it still a guided rocket?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It already neutralised


Nah your defence will be taking out, mid course correction and salvos will be at your doorstep fast.
Wait till the supersonic version comes, that will be something very special for you to watch. Your last trump card is being destroyed fast. Now the PAF will cause havoc.
 
Harbah NG is far more LO than original babur aiui. Fwik both Raad/Harbah family have actively been designed with much higher manuverability and low radar signature in mind that nirbhay doesnt have

Nirbhay is not Indian premier missile
They have
Brahmos next gen
Scalp from France
Just ordered lora from Israel
Rampage Israeli already
Pralaay which is quasi ballistic missle
Nah your defence will be taking out, mid course correction and salvos will be at your doorstep fast.
Wait till the supersonic version comes, that will be something very special for you to watch. Your last trump card is being destroyed fast. Now the PAF will cause havoc.
No matter what you induction programme yields
In the end Indias huge disparity in simple economics triple the strategic depth will render your missles mute and almost ineffective

Your entire military infrastructure major cities are in Indian door steps.. We have fewer targets to hit and distances barely 300km.

Your narrow country with no depth no where to hide your bases or key strategic targets like nuke powerplants

Pakistanis are well.aware of this on the 10th when your biggest airbases were consistently being penetrated you ran to Trump to force cease fire

Now in contrast
Not only does Indian missles outnumber you due to vast resource differences our key industrial centres and some our biggest naval bases etc are 1000km. and they are way bigger in numbers

It's just futile attempt to match a relative giant power compared to Pakistan ...Ten fold is no joke
 
Nirbhay is not Indian premier missile
They have
Brahmos next gen
Scalp from France
Just ordered lora from Israel
Rampage Israeli already
Pralaay which is quasi ballistic missle

No matter what you induction programme yields
In the end Indias huge disparity in simple economics triple the strategic depth will render your missles mute and almost ineffective

Your entire military infrastructure major cities are in Indian door steps.. We have fewer targets to hit and distances barely 300km.

Your narrow country with no depth no where to hide your bases or key strategic targets like nuke powerplants

Pakistanis are well.aware of this on the 10th when your biggest airbases were consistently being penetrated you ran to Trump to force cease fire

Now in contrast
Not only does Indian missles outnumber you due to vast resource differences our key industrial centres and some our biggest naval bases etc are 1000km. and they are way bigger in numbers

It's just futile attempt to match a relative giant power compared to Pakistan ...Ten fold is no joke
usual barking but unable to yeild any results... ten fold but still repeatedly gets whacked out the sky...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top