Türkiye - Azerbaijan | Strategic Partnership, Regional Alliance, Military Cooperation - News & Updates

Depending on the survey and how you frame your inquiry, around 40% of the populace still prefers not to completely sever ties with Russia. The legacy of decades of Soviet rule doesn't simply vanish, I suppose. The core concern isn't if Russia is capable of executing a full-scale invasion, but rather if it can conduct an operation that would destabilize Armenia enough to halt its progress towards the EU and NATO indefinitely. I am convinced that the Russians still possess this capability. The real question is whether they are prepared to assert their influence at this moment.

But they do work on some sort of punishment in the background

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




Well yes, but to be fair, Pashinyan atleast for now don't want to leave the Eurasian Union, as Armenia is still exporting to Russia and Russia is its biggest trade partner, and they also depend of remissions from Russian Armenians.

But in terms of capacity, outside of Turning off the Gas(which might backfire on Russia if Armenia ends up buying Azeri or Iranian gas) and kicking Armenia out of the Eurasian Union and banning exports, what specifically can Russia do? Any of those moves might even accelerate the Turkey Armenia process, or have EU substitution.

Idk, lets see, Pashinyan's party is expected to win the election in June, 3 weeks from now. Depending on how that goes, and what sort of mandate is given, we will see how Armenia goes for the rest of the decade and beyond.


 
Well yes, but to be fair, Pashinyan atleast for now don't want to leave the Eurasian Union, as Armenia is still exporting to Russia and Russia is its biggest trade partner, and they also depend of remissions from Russian Armenians.

But in terms of capacity, outside of Turning off the Gas(which might backfire on Russia if Armenia ends up buying Azeri or Iranian gas) and kicking Armenia out of the Eurasian Union and banning exports, what specifically can Russia do? Any of those moves might even accelerate the Turkey Armenia process, or have EU substitution.

Idk, lets see, Pashinyan's party is expected to win the election in June, 3 weeks from now. Depending on how that goes, and what sort of mandate is given, we will see how Armenia goes for the rest of the decade and beyond.



Remittance, trade, gas, oil, nuclear are all sources dependant on Russia and we're talking about percentages as high as 100% in energy imports. Russia still retains a significant amount of soft power in the Caucasus. The Armenian church, NGOs, means via corruption etc. Armenia's entire rail network is owned by the Russian government. The diaspora in Moscow is still very influential in Erivan. Some media outlets and some oligarchs in Armenia are in favor of Russian dominance in the country.

Turkey won’t interfere in Armenia either as long as her or Azerbaijani interests are not negatively impacted by Russian actions which the Russians will take care of.

The next election is absolutely historic for Armenia. No doubt about it.
 

Not good.


Sponsored by Russia. I'm pretty sure about it.
 

Azerbaijan’s Ambassador to Ankara, Rashad Mammadov, answered the question:

“Is Azerbaijan the one that does not want the Turkey-Armenia borders to open?” Speaking to Cumhuriyet, Mammadov said they are involved in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process and stated:

“The border between the two countries will be opened after the Armenian elections on June 7, once the constitutional amendment is made.”
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Post 2020 Pashinyan has been the most sensible Armenian leader in decades.
I wouldn't say that.
It was an overwhelming and brutal display of military power that brought him back to reality. Not long ago, he was recognized as a fervent anti-Turkish Armenian nationalist.

His approach to foreign policy does not stem from any enlightened perspective he holds for his nation and the broader region. Instead, he was compelled to adapt to the new circumstances established by external forces, namely by Turkey and Azerbaijan.

I support him bubut can't credit him for a behaviour he was forced to display.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Honestly, a good step forward.

With the biggest issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan now a thing of the past, and Russia sidelined as the clown nation that it is, Armenia-Turkish relations don't have any real obstacles in their way to improve.

Normalization should be hastened.
 
I wouldn't say that.
It was an overwhelming and brutal display of military power that brought him back to reality. Not long ago, he was recognized as a fervent anti-Turkish Armenian nationalist.

His approach to foreign policy does not stem from any enlightened perspective he holds for his nation and the broader region. Instead, he was compelled to adapt to the new circumstances established by external forces, namely by Turkey and Azerbaijan.

I support him bubut can't credit him for a behaviour he was forced to display.

I mean in comparison to previous leaders. He has been more in favor of Turkey than Russia.


edit:

In 1998, Pashinyan wrote an article advocating for stronger economic ties with Turkey and criticized an "anti-Turkish" sentiment in Armenia: "Of course, Armenia is the most suitable partner for Turkey in terms of economic development of Western Armenia. But all of Turkey's efforts to improve Armenian-Turkish relations have been in vain, and Armenia has not been able to get rid of the anti-Turkish complex for the past eight years."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikol_Pashinyan#cite_note-eviction_plan-5"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>

Pashinyan's Haykakan Zhamanak supported the normalization process that then-President Serzh Sargsyan and Turkish President Abdullah Gül initiated, however, he criticized the "government's way of pursuing it."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikol_Pashinyan#cite_note-338"><span>[</span>335<span>]</span></a>
 
Honestly, a good step forward.

With the biggest issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan now a thing of the past, and Russia sidelined as the clown nation that it is, Armenia-Turkish relations don't have any real obstacles in their way to improve.

Normalization should be hastened.
Russia is currently putting incredible pressure on Armenia. I don't know what else they can do except a direct military intervention like in Ukraine.

 
I mean in comparison to previous leaders. He has been more in favor of Turkey than Russia.


edit:

In 1998, Pashinyan wrote an article advocating for stronger economic ties with Turkey and criticized an "anti-Turkish" sentiment in Armenia: "Of course, Armenia is the most suitable partner for Turkey in terms of economic development of Western Armenia. But all of Turkey's efforts to improve Armenian-Turkish relations have been in vain, and Armenia has not been able to get rid of the anti-Turkish complex for the past eight years."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikol_Pashinyan#cite_note-eviction_plan-5"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>

Pashinyan's Haykakan Zhamanak supported the normalization process that then-President Serzh Sargsyan and Turkish President Abdullah Gül initiated, however, he criticized the "government's way of pursuing it."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikol_Pashinyan#cite_note-338"><span>[</span>335<span>]</span></a>
Chatgpt.com:

Yes. Before the recent Armenia–Turkey normalization process, Nikol Pashinyan made some very strong and highly critical statements about Turkey, especially during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war.

Some notable examples:

In October 2020, Pashinyan said that "Turkey has returned to the South Caucasus to continue the Armenian genocide." He argued that Turkish involvement in support of Azerbaijan should be viewed through the historical lens of the 1915 Armenian Genocide.

In interviews with international media, he accused Turkey of pursuing a policy of "reinstating the Ottoman Empire" and claimed Ankara had expansionist ambitions beyond the South Caucasus.

He stated that Turkey was "once again advancing on a genocidal path" and alleged that Turkish military involvement was directing Azerbaijan's offensive.

He also said that Turkey's actions represented a continuation of the policies that led to the Armenian Genocide and described the conflict as an "Azeri-Turkish international terroristic attack."

In another interview, he said: "Of course. I have no doubt about it. It has been Turkey's historic purpose," when asked whether he believed Turkey wanted to eliminate Armenia as an obstacle to its regional ambitions.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Russia is currently putting incredible pressure on Armenia. I don't know what else they can do except a direct military intervention like in Ukraine.

Armenia doesn't give a shit about Russia anymore. Its why they're rushing to get more support from the EU. They saw how much easier it was to make a deal with the Turks when the Russians arent there to sabotage talks.

Putin can threaten all he likes, but right now he can't afford to take his focus off of Ukraine. A second front would be suicide for Putin.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top