Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Speaking to Al Mayadeen, Saeid Ajorloo, a member of the media team close to the Iranian negotiating delegation, said that the US-Iran agreement includes a clause that would allow Iran’s withdrawal if the Americans renege on returning $14 billion of its frozen assets.

He highlighted that so far, the Iranian side has not approved the Memorandum of Understanding and has not informed the Pakistani mediator of an approval.

Ajorloo noted that if the Americans violate any of the terms of the understanding, Iran will revert to its current measures in the Strait of Hormuz.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
There's a report that we've reached the beginning of a peace deal with Iran. So, I'll predict the future for you, so you can see how scripted everything is.

Now, tons of pundits will all pour into media saying what a bad deal it is and how we have to continue the war and finish off Iran.

They all pretend to be Americans, but they're working for Israel. Israel wants more war, so these talking heads will all say that more war is better for America.

American media companies will gladly quote them and bring them on-air, over and over, to give the false appearance that Americans want more war, when polling indicates the exact opposite.

Then Netanyahu will call Trump. Afterwards, Trump will have new, unreasonable demands that will either delay or kill the deal.

If this is the one time that Trump doesn't listen to Israel, then there will be stories all over American media that are negative about Trump. And they'll question his fitness for office and whether it's time for him to step down.

All of this is coordinated and highly predictable. It is a perpetual propaganda campaign Israel runs in this country. And there are many people here loyal to them, for money or other reasons, and they actively work against American interests. Their job is to deceive you into doing what's best for Israel, and not us.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
VCheng said:
No, you missed it again.

Persia has existed for thousands of years, and undoubtedly will exist for a long time yet to come. Its survival is not in question here. It will carry on just fine.

The real question - again - is whether its current policies help or impede the economic well-being of its people.
Click to expand...

Now your trolling
 
Hassan Al-Somal said:
There's a report that we've reached the beginning of a peace deal with Iran. So, I'll predict the future for you, so you can see how scripted everything is.

Now, tons of pundits will all pour into media saying what a bad deal it is and how we have to continue the war and finish off Iran.

They all pretend to be Americans, but they're working for Israel. Israel wants more war, so these talking heads will all say that more war is better for America.

American media companies will gladly quote them and bring them on-air, over and over, to give the false appearance that Americans want more war, when polling indicates the exact opposite.

Then Netanyahu will call Trump. Afterwards, Trump will have new, unreasonable demands that will either delay or kill the deal.

If this is the one time that Trump doesn't listen to Israel, then there will be stories all over American media that are negative about Trump. And they'll question his fitness for office and whether it's time for him to step down.

All of this is coordinated and highly predictable. It is a perpetual propaganda campaign Israel runs in this country. And there are many people here loyal to them, for money or other reasons, and they actively work against American interests. Their job is to deceive you into doing what's best for Israel, and not us.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


Quoted for the record for later, when all details are finally known, especially including what result comes from the conclusion of the 60-day negotiation process on the nuclear issue.

It is best to wait for those developments before making such assumptions IMO.
 
Hassan Al-Somal said:
Speaking to Al Mayadeen, Saeid Ajorloo, a member of the media team close to the Iranian negotiating delegation, said that the US-Iran agreement includes a clause that would allow Iran’s withdrawal if the Americans renege on returning $14 billion of its frozen assets.

He highlighted that so far, the Iranian side has not approved the Memorandum of Understanding and has not informed the Pakistani mediator of an approval.

Ajorloo noted that if the Americans violate any of the terms of the understanding, Iran will revert to its current measures in the Strait of Hormuz.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


Suffice to say that some just simply don't understand how strategic the control of Hormuz really is for Iran. It has tremendous security implications... detrimental to the state!
Let go now and forever lose the claim.
 
Immortals said:
It seems vessels are no longer scared of IRGC and the strait is becoming a tad more leaky as vessels get sneak out when IRGC is not paying attention.

This is what happens when you fail to upload deterrence.
Click to expand...

In my oppinion US is using civilian ships to force the blockade. They're dealing but in reality they're testing and learning how works the kinetic measures of IRGC to force blockade.

If US continues in such way a DDG may be hit. Irán would have no more option than escalate the ladder hitting a warship.
 
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ said:
Suffice to say that some just simply don't understand how strategic the control of Hormuz really is for Iran. It has tremendous security implications... detrimental to the state!
Let go now and forever lose the claim.
Click to expand...

Hormuz is indeed of strategic importance and it would be huge achievement for the side that wins control over it. 100% agreed.
 
Persian Gulf said:
New clashes between Iran and the U.S. Navy in the Strait of Hormuz area now
Click to expand...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Escalating now i think
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
NO TO ABHRAHAM ACCORDS PERIOD...
BY ALL MEANS RE START THE WAR....
BUT PAKISTAN WILL BE NEVER EVER BE IN SAME LEAGUE WHERE FILTHY UAE PIGLETS ARE PART OF... ...
SO BASICALLY ILLEGAL ENTITY UAE AND BAHRIN CAN GO FCK THEMSELVES...
TIT FOR TAT....
Mount hermon I wonder if PAF can take a pic or two of it...
MAKE SYRIA MELTING BLAZING VOLCANIC ASH FOR ISRAEL....THATS THE FCKING RESPONSE
 
VCheng said:
What you did not realize is that the question posed was not about political beliefs, but rather economic well-being:

Do Iranians feel that having a nuclear weapon will improve their economic well-being?
Click to expand...
Im pretty sure North Korea would have good economic well being thanks to China if they weren't a communist dictatorship. So it's not the nukes that's causing NK issues but rather the establishment in charge. That's why your question is a bit of a non-sequitur.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 135 (members: 7, guests: 128)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top