VCheng
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
It can be demand draft or bank Cheques![]()
The claim was made "in cash".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It can be demand draft or bank Cheques![]()
Huh? It's a terrible deal because most of what Iran gets is dependent on determining the fate of HEU in Iran, not because how it's signed lolOn what basis is it a terrible deal if it is signed electronically? No one knows. It is all speculation right now.
In which universe 440 kilograms of 60% HEU has no defensive or offensive value? Seriously?There’s no deal. It’s just an excuse for a ceasefire.
Please list what Iran is giving up?
SoH and Missile tech are Iran’s leverage and will keep being deployed whenever Iran needs it.
HEU has no offensive or defensive value to Iran.
Iran wasn’t attacked because it was a nuclear threat.
It was attacked because it was a geopolitical threat. Hence the effort to turn it into a failed state.
The US also gets 60 days, just like us. Time is not on our side if the US says the blockade will remain in effect.You should be a bit more optimistic. During this 60 days Irán will get two important things,
One is time (60 days).
The other is money.
While enriching more uranium and manufacturing nuclear delivery systems, Irán just need to send the first payment (3.000 millions USD) directly to Russia and collect the complete Su35 squadron while assembling more missiles.
Here we have an old proverb "Pray to God, but keep hammering away.".
The US also gets 60 days, just like us. Time is not on our side if the US says the blockade will remain in effect.
You talk like Russia's reason for not delivering Sukhoi-35s to Iran is money, which is baseless
Iran should abandon stationary air defenses such as S-300 and HQ-9 which have proven to be completely useless against a powerful enemy with a god tier air force and navy
They all have been destroyed or rendered inoperable in the first days of the war
And instead invest in mobile systems with ambush capabilities
I think they figured that out in the first days of the war and deployed low cost home built 358 and 359 systems and they have had a great success with themIran should abandon stationary air defenses such as S-300 and HQ-9 which have proven to be completely useless against a powerful enemy with a god tier air force and navy
They all have been destroyed or rendered inoperable in the first days of the war
And instead invest in mobile systems with ambush capabilities
1 hour ago
I think they figured that out in the first days of the war and deployed low cost home built 358 and 359 systems and they have had a great success with them
Its my personal opinion so take it with a grain of salt but i think these heatseeking homegrown lowcost air defence systems are what prompted trump to seek a settlement, hopefully they will build further on these systems and make their airspace a certain deathzone for any enemy aircraft.
S-300 and HQ-9 are mobile. The perception of the lack of mobility is more of an Iranian deployment and doctrine issue than the platform itself ( and there is no reason to believe that Iran has the HQ-9 as China denied any weapons transfer were made btw). The reason why Iran's systems were ineffective is because they got destroyed early on in the war by drones, and UAV's and sabotage locally through special missions. Iran it seems(to me at least) did not build a layered defense around the S-300 of SHORADS, CIWS and ALBM to protect them.
Hopefully the lessons learnt from this war will help address the issues specific to protecting these high value assets.
India did try and go after the HQ-9s during SIndoor, and failed as an example ! ( Appreciate that Pakistan does not have the same problems that Iran faces !)
The problem is that Pakistan faced IAF which proven to be largely incompetent at every skirmish they launched, IAF is not a world class air force and doesn't possess any stealth aircraftS-300 and HQ-9 are mobile. The perception of the lack of mobility is more of an Iranian deployment and doctrine issue than the platform itself ( and there is no reason to believe that Iran has the HQ-9 as China denied any weapons transfer were made btw). The reason why Iran's systems were ineffective is because they got destroyed early on in the war by drones, and UAV's and sabotage locally through special missions. Iran it seems(to me at least) did not build a layered defense around the S-300 of SHORADS, CIWS and ALBM to protect them.
Hopefully the lessons learnt from this war will help address the issues specific to protecting these high value assets.
India did try and go after the HQ-9s during SIndoor, and failed as an example ! ( Appreciate that Pakistan does not have the same problems that Iran faces !)
Remember Anduril Roadrunner It is just a copy of the Shaheds 358/9 concept. Just a microrreactor with a IR seeker to chase low speed targets like other drones and helicopters, so you're right many more will come.The 358 and 359 systems are an interesting concept and highlights some of Iran's local innovation that many air arms will look at more closely.
Yeah seem so, I think Trump is getting tired of Netanayo or something?Man he is one desperate man …. First posting Iranians and now Pakistanis as if to tell everyone don’t belive me but this time it’s real ….
The problem is that Pakistan faced IAF which proven to be largely incompetent at every skirmish they launched, IAF is not a world class air force and doesn't possess any stealth aircraft
Iran is facing USAF and IDF at the same time with tremendous combat experience equipped with latest technologies
Every USAF/IDF aircraft Iran downed was with mobile systems such as Majid, proving USAF/IDF are vulnerable to ambushes and not big systems with huge radar like S-300 which gets instantly destroyed thanks to USAF intel capabilities
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.