In South Asia, America has stopped asking India for permission

[MNZGamerX]

This is another perspective on Jon Danilowicz by a prominent social media activist Sumon Kais and while I disagree with certain points he makes his view about Danilowicz is shared by many in Bangladesh -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Afif]

I dont know about those things what i know is that india got a massive new boeing factory, 2 massive datacentres and 50 billion in new investments from amazon. Intel has also signed a deal that all chips sold in subcontinent will be made in india.

Im now beginning to see strategic disentanglement starts with massive tech transfer and billions in new investment. Oh lord¡ please keep india safe. What a fall¡

I guess we are abandoning the CIA coup hypothesis to overthrow Hassina and disregarding potential US support for Jamaat Islami as conspiracy then. Or it must be secretly totally aligned with India's strategic interests in BD.

Some retard might end up thinking China is USA's biggest strategic partner given how much US investment it has recieved ove the years and continue to do so.

 

[peacemaker99]

I guess we are abandoning the CIA coup hypothesis to overthrow Hassina and disregarding potential US support for Jamaat Islami as conspiracy then. Or it must be secretly totally aligned with India's strategic interests in BD.

Some retard might end up thinking China is USA's biggest strategic partner given how much US investment it has recieved ove the years and continue to do so.

Pretty sure tge US says china is their b*itch. Despite the hot air when have they ever opposec US substantially?

 

[retaxis]

I guess we are abandoning the CIA coup hypothesis to overthrow Hassina and disregarding potential US support for Jamaat Islami as conspiracy then. Or it must be secretly totally aligned with India's strategic interests in BD.

Some retard might end up thinking China is USA's biggest strategic partner given how much US investment it has recieved ove the years and continue to do so.

USA goal is to make china great again

-China is EV/Renewables leader So USA invades Iran and forces everyone to buy chinese EVs and solar/wind turbines etc.
-US attacks venezuela and threatens Greenland which means western countries de dollarise and buy more Chinese goods and sell/stop buying treasury bonds of US
-US thinks petrodollar is their backbone so US attacks Iran and now Russia/Iran/Central Asia all selling oil in petroyuan.

USA loves China so much that even Israel is only second best friend to China!

 

[c14-Isotope]

Not even a single mention of any instance when US asked India for permission in this whole brainfart by a delusional Bangladeshi??

 

[baldfish]

This is another perspective on Jon Danilowicz by a prominent social media activist Sumon Kais and while I disagree with certain points he makes his view about Danilowicz is shared by many in Bangladesh -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Who the f is this dude? His interpretation falls in line with the awami vassals of hindustan.

 

[baldfish]

Not even a single mention of any instance when US asked India for permission in this whole brainfart by a delusional Bangladeshi??

Its copium from awami sudras who are dreaming of papa india to come and rescue them like 71.

 

[Ali_Baba]

The writer is trying to bring Bangladesh at par with Pakistan in geopolitical importance.... nothing wrong with it as long as it stays within the boundaries of daydreaming.

Bangladesh is economically much more powerful than Pakistan. Bangladesh has a GDP of $510 billion with 170 million people, and Pakistan is at $452 with 240 million people... Bangladesh is economically important, more than Pakistan, and that has its own geopolitical relevance on the world stage.

 

[LeonBlack08]

This is another perspective on Jon Danilowicz by a prominent social media activist Sumon Kais and while I disagree with certain points he makes his view about Danilowicz is shared by many in Bangladesh -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Not sure who this guy is, but for the sake of discussion - let's say US did use Jamaat to get rid of Hasina to remove Indian influence from Bangladesh, so that it can exert itself into getting control over Bangladesh.

Jamaat must have surely seen what happened to Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? Similar situation in that they were instrumental in the uprising that led to the fall of Hosni Mubarak. They eventually came to power, but only to experience a coup by Pro US Gen Sisi.

From Jamaat perspective - perhaps it is a marriage of convenience? They needed to become mainstream and escape the persecution under Hasina regime. So they decided to shake hands with the devil.

Jamaat even if they ever come to power, will not survive just like the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt. They can't go full into US camp because that would upset their voter base. And they have to take maintain a strong anti India stance for the very reason.

Despite the complete US ability to rig the 2026 election, they didn't come to power. It was BNP who as expected by everyone, came to power.

It feels to me they were used as tool by US and will be discarded when the right time comes. Since a more palatable candidate is available in the form of BNP - they backed them instead. BNP had to have made a deal of some sort with US to ensure they are in power. Which is probably why we have Khalil being retained as FM. BNP is a far more acceptable as candidate to back than Jamaat for US.

Considering the argument that Jamaat is still doing US bidding - US may have not fully let Jamaat off the leash, to keep pressure on BNP to do their bidding. If BNP fails, they may push Jamaat into power as plan B.

But a military coup like Egypt could also serve the purpose for US. In fact, it will be significantly more acceptable than a Islamist party coming to power, whose majority support base hates US.

So what's the US endgame for Jamaat?

What am I missing here?

 

[Ali_Baba]

Bangladesh is economically much more powerful than Pakistan. Bangladesh has a GDP of $510 billion with 170 million people, and Pakistan is at $452 with 240 million people... Bangladesh is economically important, more than Pakistan, and that has its own geopolitical relevance on the world stage.

Pakistan has to achieve a economy of about ~$720 billion to match Bagadesh on economic productivity and activity per person btw given the large differences in population.

 

[MNZGamerX]

Who the f is this dude? His interpretation falls in line with the awami vassals of hindustan.

He has 400 000 followers on FB and is consistently against India, Israel and the USA ... Not sure what that makes him.

 

[MNZGamerX]

It feels to me they were used as tool by US and will be discarded when the right time comes. Since a more palatable candidate is available in the form of BNP - they backed them instead. BNP had to have made a deal of some sort with US to ensure they are in power.

No the US still backs the Jamaat as they do not want stability in the region and seeks to use the party as a provocation to India. The BNP came to power with Indian support but appeared to seek to placate the Americans by bringing in Khalil, Asad and Ashiq into the government. It seems the BNP fears the possibility of another regime change operation so is also trying to balance against the Americans by leaning towards China and also India but juggling so many balls will likely get the BNP into trouble as it did the Awami League. The Americans still back the Jamaat as they wish to provoke India into some kind of rash action against Bangladesh and create an unstable situation throughout the region. The Americans do not want a Bangladesh government to succeed but want the country to become a failed state like Afghanistan and to be used against India and China. The Jamaat are happy to play the American game and attempted the same thing duirng 1/11 but were outplayed by the Indians and the Americans instructed the Jamaat to sit back till the time was right. The Americans waited 15 years to see if the Indians fell into line and adopt a more aggressive posture towards China but they did not do so or at least to the extent desired by Washington and also retained their strategic autonomy policy which is anathema to the Americans. Now the Americans have turned against the Indians and seek to use the Jamaat as a red flag to provoke New Delhi. I explain all this in my essay which is now a sticky so if anyone wants further explanation go to that thread -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[LeonBlack08]

No the US still backs the Jamaat as they do not want stability in the region and seeks to use the party as a provocation to India. The BNP came to power with Indian support but appeared to seek to placate the Americans by bringing in Khalil, Asad and Ashiq into the government. It seems the BNP fears the possibility of another regime change operation so is also trying to balance against the Americans by leaning towards China and also India but juggling so many balls will likely get the BNP into trouble as it did the Awami League. The Americans still back the Jamaat as they wish to provoke India into some kind of rash action against Bangladesh and create an unstable situation throughout the region. The Americans do not want a Bangladesh government to succeed but want the country to become a failed state like Afghanistan and to be used against India and China. The Jamaat are happy to play the American game and attempted the same thing duirng 1/11 but were outplayed by the Indians and the Americans instructed the Jamaat to sit back till the time was right. The Americans waited 15 years to see if the Indians fell into line and adopt a more aggressive posture towards China but they did do so to the extent desired by Washington while also retaining their strategic autonomy which is anathema to the Americans. Now the Americans have turned against the Indians and seek to use the Jamaat as a red flag to provoke New Delhi. I explain all this in my essay which is now a sticky so if anyone wants further explanation go to that thread -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Ok. I started reading your essay, but haven't finished it yet. When I am done, we will discuss more in that thread.

 

[MNZGamerX]

Ok. I started reading your essay, but haven't finished it yet. When I am done, we will discuss more in that thread.

Most of it doesn't have to do with Bangladesh. The relevant part is at the end and the essay is basically an introduction to the main work which contains all the details but is currently inaccessible on the internet ...

 

[baldfish]

He has 400 000 followers on FB and is consistently against India, Israel and the USA ... Not sure what that makes him.

How many of those are bot's from bot farms?

Just checked his FB he is getting a ram dhollai

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies