Global Naval Power Rankings 2026 - US Navy Retains Top Ranking

But for surface fleet India Navy is much more powerful.

The Russian Navy holds a significant advantage in global Submarine warfare and long range strike capabilities, while the Indian Navy fields more modernized surface fleet with superior Aircraft Carrier power.

but , Russian Navy has the best anti-ship Missile in the world

Russian ZIRCON hypersonic anti-ship Missile is 3 times faster than BRAHMOS
and with range of 1.000 km to destroy Carrier Strike Groups

Indian Navy Destroyers with BARAK-8 SAM can not intercept Russian ZIRCON hypersonic Missile

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The Russian Navy holds a significant advantage in global Submarine warfare and long range strike capabilities, while the Indian Navy fields more modernized surface fleet with superior Aircraft Carrier power.

but , Russian Navy has the best anti-ship Missile in the world

Russian ZIRCON hypersonic anti-ship Missile is 3 times faster than BRAHMOS
and with range of 1.000 km to destroy Carrier Strike Groups

Indian Navy Destroyers with BARAK-8 SAM can not intercept Russian ZIRCON hypersonic Missile

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Kindly summarize how the Indian Navy has superior aircraft carrier power. Superior compared to what? Is the Indian Navy equal to in capability or simply better than the Royal Navy?
 
Kindly summarize how the Indian Navy has superior aircraft carrier power. Superior compared to what? Is the Indian Navy equal to in capability or simply better than the Royal Navy?
Where did he mention the Royal Navy?
 
Kindly summarize how the Indian Navy has superior aircraft carrier power. Superior compared to what? Is the Indian Navy equal to in capability or simply better than the Royal Navy?

I am talking about to compare with the Russian Navy
 
Indian Navy Destroyers with BARAK-8 SAM can not intercept Russian ZIRCON hypersonic Missile
Barak-8 isn't limited to the Indian Navy's destroyers. It's also deployed on the Project 17A frigates and INS Vikrant.
 
Kindly summarize how the Indian Navy has superior aircraft carrier power. Superior compared to what? Is the Indian Navy equal to in capability or simply better than the Royal Navy?
By the way, doesn't the Royal Navy share its carrier air wing with the RAF? Or does it have its own dedicated fighter air wing? Also, are the carriers doing fine in terms of long-range deployments, considering the UK is a blue-water navy?
 
Seeing as how I'm slowly becoming like others here, this was the question asked:

Please provide a summary of the capabilities of the Indian Navy aircraft carrier Vikrant compared to other navies with aircraft carriers.

Response:

INS Vikrant is India's first indigenously built aircraft carrier and a major milestone for the country's naval industry. While it places India among the relatively small group of nations that operate aircraft carriers, its capabilities differ from those of the largest carriers fielded by the United States and some other navies.
Here's how it compares.
FeatureINS Vikrant (India)Typical U.S. SupercarrierUK/French CarriersChinese Carriers
Displacement~45,000 tons~100,000 tons42,000–65,000 tons60,000–80,000+ tons
Launch systemSki-jump (STOBAR)Catapults (CATOBAR)Ski-jump (UK), catapults (France)Ski-jump (older), catapults (newest)
Air wing~30–40 aircraft~70–90 aircraft~30–40 aircraft~30–60 aircraft
PropulsionConventionalNuclear (U.S.)Conventional (UK), nuclear (France)Conventional

Strengths​

1. Modern indigenous design
Vikrant was designed and built largely in India, giving the country valuable expertise in carrier construction and reducing reliance on foreign shipbuilders.
2. Regional power projection
The carrier significantly extends India's ability to:
  • Conduct maritime security operations.
  • Protect sea lanes in the Indian Ocean.
  • Respond to humanitarian disasters.
  • Support amphibious and joint military operations.
  • Maintain a sustained air presence far from shore.
3. Modern sensors and combat systems
Vikrant incorporates:
  • Modern radar suites.
  • Electronic warfare systems.
  • Networked combat management systems.
  • Surface-to-air missile defenses and close-in weapon systems for self-defense.
Like most carriers, however, it depends heavily on escorts such as destroyers, frigates, submarines, and replenishment ships for protection.

Aircraft capability​

Vikrant currently operates:
  • MiG-29K fighters
  • Kamov Ka-31 helicopters
  • MH-60R Seahawk helicopters
  • Utility helicopters
India is evaluating future carrier fighters, including the Rafale M and a planned indigenous twin-engine deck-based fighter.

Compared with the U.S. Navy​

The United States Navy remains in a class of its own in carrier operations.
Advantages of U.S. carriers include:
  • Roughly double the displacement.
  • Much larger air wings.
  • Nuclear propulsion, allowing virtually unlimited range without refueling.
  • Catapult launch systems capable of launching heavier aircraft with larger fuel and weapon loads.
  • Dedicated airborne early warning aircraft (such as the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye), which provide substantially greater radar coverage than helicopter-based systems.
  • Extensive operational experience from decades of global deployments.

Compared with China​

People's Liberation Army Navy has expanded rapidly.
  • China's first two carriers use ski-jump launches similar in concept to Vikrant.
  • Its newest carrier, Fujian, uses electromagnetic catapults, bringing it closer to U.S. carrier capabilities.
  • China currently operates more aircraft carriers than India, though carrier effectiveness depends on factors beyond hull numbers, including training, logistics, aircraft, and escort fleets.

Compared with the UK and France​

  • Royal Navy operates two large carriers optimized for the F-35B Lightning II.
  • French Navy operates Charles de Gaulle, a nuclear-powered carrier with catapults that can launch heavier aircraft, including fixed-wing airborne early warning aircraft.
Vikrant's size is broadly comparable to the UK's carriers but differs in aircraft type and launch system.

Limitations​

Compared with the most capable carrier navies, Vikrant has several constraints:
  • Smaller aircraft capacity than U.S. supercarriers.
  • Ski-jump operations limit maximum launch weight compared with catapult-equipped carriers.
  • No fixed-wing airborne early warning aircraft.
  • Conventional propulsion requires periodic refueling.
  • India's carrier force is currently relatively small, so maintaining continuous carrier availability can be more challenging than for navies with larger carrier fleets.

Overall assessment​

INS Vikrant represents a significant enhancement of India's naval capabilities and firmly establishes India as one of the few countries able to design, build, and operate aircraft carriers. It is well suited for regional power projection, maritime security, and humanitarian missions across the Indian Ocean. While it does not match the scale, air wing size, or global reach of U.S. supercarriers, nor the newest catapult-equipped carriers entering service elsewhere, it is a capable modern carrier that substantially strengthens India's maritime presence within its primary area of strategic interest.
 
I'm asking a question and opted to choose the Royal Navy as the basis of comparison.
He never brought the Royal Navy into the discussion. So what made you suddenly compare the Indian Navy's carrier with the Royal Navy's carrier?
 
Barak-8 isn't limited to the Indian Navy's destroyers. It's also deployed on the Project 17A frigates and INS Vikrant.

Russian P-700 , P-800 , 3M-54 KALIBR supersonic anti-ship Missiles are enough for them

Also , Around 650 Russian Aircraft ( SU-30 , SU-34 , SU-35 , MIG-31 , TU-22 ) can carry supersonic anti-ship Missiles to turn Indian naval fleet into scrap of metal

even I am not talking about 100 MIG-31 Fighter Jets with KINZHAL hypersonic Missile capable of anti-ship strikes at Mach 10
 
By the way, doesn't the Royal Navy share its carrier air wing with the RAF? Or does it have its own dedicated fighter air wing? Also, are the carriers doing fine in terms of long-range deployments, considering the UK is a blue-water navy?
Are you capable of doing your own research or has it become necessary that others do it for you?
 
Are you capable of doing your own research or has it become necessary that others do it for you?
Are you capable of following the discussion, or do others have to do that for you as well?

The original comparison was between Indian carriers and their Russian counterparts. Nobody mentioned the Royal Navy or any other top navy. So why did you suddenly drag them into the discussion? You're arguing against a point that was never made. Read the thread first, then respond.
 
Russian P-700 , P-800 , 3M-54 KALIBR supersonic anti-ship Missiles are enough for them

Also , Around 650 Russian Aircraft ( SU-30 , SU-34 , SU-35 , MIG-31 , TU-22 ) can carry supersonic anti-ship Missiles to turn Indian naval fleet into scrap of metal

even I am not talking about 100 MIG-31 Fighter Jets with KINZHAL hypersonic Missile capable of anti-ship strikes at Mach 10
Let them first figure out how to protect their Black Sea Fleet from a country that barely has a conventional navy. Then they can worry about everyone else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top