How Beijing 'tripled the size of its nuclear arsenal' in six years

[Lulldapull]

Iran is invincible as long as you are covering Iran in spread eagle position.

Bhai China has no modern warfare experience whatsoever! None of their BMs are proven let alone their drones.

Iranian SRBMs/ IRBMs and drones punk US defenses daily no?

 

[ety]

Bhai China has no modern warfare experience whatsoever! None of their BMs are proven let alone their drones.

Iranian SRBMs/ IRBMs and drones punk US defenses daily no?

These skirmish experiences with some small or medium countries are no use for China in preparation for a possible war between US and China in the near future. Fighting experiences can be make up in stringent trainings and war games conditions. Before joining WW II, the US military had no fighting experiences for many years.

 

[Shui]

lol 600? more like 1500 already

 

[retaxis]

Bhai China has no modern warfare experience whatsoever! None of their BMs are proven let alone their drones.

Iranian SRBMs/ IRBMs and drones punk US defenses daily no?

Lack of fighting experience also means that usa does not know what to expect from a war with china either. China could completely dominate usa using shock and awe because usa has not prepared for it as it has not seen china fight either. Your logic cuts both ways.

right now China knows how America fights but America does not know how China fights and China likes it that way.

 

[Lulldapull]

Lack of fighting experience also means that usa does not know what to expect from a war with china either. China could completely dominate usa using shock and awe because usa has not prepared for it as it has not seen china fight either. Your logic cuts both ways.

right now China knows how America fights but America does not know how China fights and China likes it that way.

Brah.....I don't mind China as Chinese people are nice and helpful and all.......but here we got Iranian revolutionary guard busting da US/ Israeli's right in de ass daily with its own home grown weaponry no?

Iran don't need Russia nor China. Blatantly obvious no?

Iran keeps da SOH shut for just a few more months, and many billions of colluddz people will die no?

You know this right? I mean you understand this no?

 

[Shui]

Since 2020s, Chinese strategic force was under unprecedented expansion, but ofc, better just assume we have 600 warheads.

 

[Nimble]

Having more of nuclear weapons is waste of money and resources. I think North Korea possess only 50 or 60 nukes but even then it can destroy shanghai, Hong Kong, beging and make it unlivable for decades.... instead have them in limited nos as a deference and use Balance uranium for energy purpose like India....

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Since 2020s, Chinese strategic force was under unprecedented expansion, but ofc, better just assume we have 600 warheads.

More likely that China already got more than ICBM.

 

[RealNapster]

I think North Korea possess only 50 or 60 nukes but even then it can destroy shanghai, Hong Kong, beging and make it unlivable for decades

I think you unintentionally lost the target list. Why would NK drop Nukes on Shanghai, HongKong, and Beijing ?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I think you unintentionally lost the target list. Why would NK drop Nukes on Shanghai, HongKong, and Beijing ?

Just ignore the troll.

I think NK's nuclear arsenal is much more powerful and capable than that of India.

 

[Nimble]

I think you unintentionally lost the target list. Why would NK drop Nukes on Shanghai, HongKong, and Beijing ?

This was just an example as north Korea possess lowest nos of warheads if I'm correct but still they are a nuclear threat to even America who has 5000 nukes.... France possess only 290 nukes but my physics teacher told that single Barracuda submarine armed with M.51 can evaporate 11 major Chinese cities in one go...
So nos is just a show off...

 

[K2RULEZ]

600 ？How credible are these US think tanks and DOD on estimates of Chinese nuke arsenal ? Like China is supposed to have collapsed many times before. China needs at least 1500.

The Western think tanks know as much as I do.

 

[ety]

Having more of nuclear weapons is waste of money and resources. I think North Korea possess only 50 or 60 nukes but even then it can destroy shanghai, Hong Kong, beging and make it unlivable for decades.... instead have them in limited nos as a deference and use Balance uranium for energy purpose like India....

Fool, why would you contemplate that NK is going to nuke China ? NK would rather drop nukes on Delhi and Mumbai many times than going to war with China. Only delusional Indians can come up with such unreal and false ideas, lol.

 

[K2RULEZ]

This was just an example as north Korea possess lowest nos of warheads if I'm correct but still they are a nuclear threat to even America who has 5000 nukes.... France possess only 290 nukes but my physics teacher told that single Barracuda submarine armed with M.51 can evaporate 11 major Chinese cities in one go...
So nos is just a show off...

Why not nuke Mumbai or Delhi instead? Sounds more feasible.

What makes you think a single Chinese nuke won't obliterate dozens of Indian cities?

LOL having more nukes is a waste of money.

"Saaaaar, only madar India should have thousands of nukes!"

 

[ety]

This was just an example as north Korea possess lowest nos of warheads if I'm correct but still they are a nuclear threat to even America who has 5000 nukes.... France possess only 290 nukes but my physics teacher told that single Barracuda submarine armed with M.51 can evaporate 11 major Chinese cities in one go...
So nos is just a show off...

Then your France and India will be totally obliterated by Chinese nukes. Keep masturbating that others will nuke China you little pathetic India.