MS Sandhu
Registered Member
US Says Not Involved in Redirecting Pakistan-Bound LNG Tanker
If it's not US, then who the f#k is stopping our Tankers?
If it's not US, then who the f#k is stopping our Tankers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These kind of account just create justification for USA and the west to attack Iran with tactical nuck ....Still a nuclear weapon with equally adverse ramifications, just less effective as a weapon.
These missiles don't exist because they don't make any sense. The nuclear fallout renders them unusable and they provide no advantage over conventional rocket engines for warfare. Same reasons why the US abandoned their nuclear powered aircraft. The US was developing these engines for interplanetary use to save weight and space on fuel but abandoned them in the early 70s.
GCC gets paid... with interest! Pakistan provides salve labor... a subsidy they can and do replace with other wannabe slaves, either from India, Bangladesh or Philippines among others...You do realize that Pakistan has strategic relations with GCC countries and they have supported Pakistan through every thick and thin.
Iran is right next door... get it over your head that you can solve an energy crisis from choke points... that can be done overland. China has to worry about it's energy exactly because of these choke points that US can block to stop it's energy access from Mideast. Europe got it's underwater pipeline blown up....Iran can never take their place.Get it into your mind.It's not only about oil&gas.
Confrontation?Now coming to US stoping Pakistani LNG tanker, it is still a developing story.But if indeed US stops that Tanker from reaching Pakistan, Pakistan has established channels to communicate its concerns. If everything fails, there are alternative routes and then there are alternative suppliers also but since everything is run on credit in Pakistan, we can forget can forget about that.
Confrontation with US for a gas Tanker is a non brainer.
Is it the money always?
This is trumps way of saying "do more" to pakistan just like his predecessors in bush, obama and biden paying no regard to ground realities.GCC gets paid... with interest! Pakistan provides salve labor... a subsidy they can and do replace with other wannabe slaves, either from India, Bangladesh or Philippines among others...
Iran is right next door... get it over your head that you can solve an energy crisis from choke points... that can be done overland. China has to worry about it's energy exactly because of these choke points that US can block to stop it's energy access from Mideast. Europe got it's underwater pipeline blown up....
There is no alternative... either you produce your own... divest into other forms of energy or access it from easiest, direct and easily secured route possible. That could be overland gas from Turkmenistan or pipelines from Russia or Iran which is right next door. Best yet, Pakistan doesn't need dollars to buy that energy...
Confrontation?
This tanker was coming as others previously BECAUSE it was heading to Pakistan and thus far no one touched anything headed that way....
This is new and it only reflects that one party would burn a bridge ... a bridge that Pakistan enabled... to get the ceasefire and MoU through ...
That bridge is on fire right now!
I think we're actually closer in agreement than it may seem. My only objection was to the claim that these concepts "don't make any sense." The historical record clearly shows otherwise, they were engineered, built, tested, and demonstrated. The fact that they were not deployed does not mean the technology was invalid; it means that, for those specific applications, the risks, costs, and practical challenges outweighed the benefits....I didn't say that. NERVA was for propulsion in space and did not have these issues. The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion did. The official reason for that too was given as budgetary but later disclosures revealed "severe crash and radiation hazards" as the primary reason for internal opposition. Both technologies had already been demonstrated as workable.
The question is where he’s repositioning them?
The weekly amount escaping Iran’s blockade has been increasing since MoU collapse. The SoH is becoming leaky and Iran will need to assert dominance again by hitting 3-4 ships to get them to back off again.
The whole world besides a few countries, is an existential threat to Iran, America, South America, Japan etc, are all threats and accomplices
Unfortunately if Iran doesn't strike all of them pre-emptively just in case then it is just a matter of time before they hit Iran like Ukraine did
By doing nothing Iran is giving consent to be attacked first just like Ukraine did recently
It's the only solution. The US is not going to leave Iran alone, not as long as Trump is in the office and the Congress and the Senate are voting in favor of his foreign policies.IMO the most logical and cost-effective option for Iran is to go nuclear ...