PTI news, updates and discussions part ll

[Trailer23]

...I will hold a candle for you..

champ..

A candle, huh. Yeah, i'm certain that's your favourite tool. It's okay, you need not hold or carry your bedside toy collection for me.

Ok Chump

 

[Gripen9]

I hope they throw her in prison for the statements she made not to long ago.

Who said "Yeh jo dheshat gardi hai, uske pechey wardi hai...."

Is that person in jail?

 

[Gripen9]

Said the desert to the sand...

Not too long ago, you too were in the same boat, but like WSK (Wajahat Saeed Khan), you have changed your views 180°.

Its too bad the old [PDF] isn't around anymore, otherwise I wouldn't of had any issues finding your pro-Establishment views.

So please..., save your crap for someone who gives a shit.

Wouldn't you consider this as evolution of thought for a person?

I am 49, 5-6 years ago, I would have trolled my friends saying "meri siyasi jamaat ka intekhaabi nishan hai DMS boot"
Unfortunately I have been red pilled and now black pilled over the course of past 4-5 years.

 

[Mobius]

Genuinely got a tear in my eye. May Allah bless them both.....

 

[Trailer23]

Who said "Yeh jo dheshat gardi hai, uske pechey wardi hai...."

Is that person in jail?

You think I give a f#*k about Plastic Chachi...?

...and last I checked - she went behind bars too (at some point).

This old hags has yet to be behind bars. Laikin kya karey..., IK ke baji hain tou aap ki bhee baji bun gaee hain.

 

[Gripen9]

You think I give a f#*k about Plastic Chachi...?

...and last I checked - she went behind bars too (at some point).

This old hags has yet to be behind bars. Laikin kya karey..., IK ke baji hain tou aap ki bhee baji bun gaee hain.

Why do you have to make everything personal?

I’ve been respectful and haven’t called you any names. I’m simply asking you some fairly straightforward questions.

And no, she’s not related to me. I have my own bajis and I’m quite happy with those.

But you’ve still avoided the actual questions I raised.

What exactly was the charge for which Maryam Safdar was temporarily put in that “guest house” jail—with cellphone access and other amenities? Surely it wasn’t treason or sedition; it was a corruption case.

I asked you this previously, and you conveniently ignored it. Is the Constitution supposed to be the supreme law of the land or not? If it is, what should the consequence be for those who openly subvert it? Is undermining the constitutional order somehow less serious than an inflammatory statement made by a civilian?

And if you’re genuinely outraged by threats to the state, shouldn’t that outrage be directed even more strongly at those in uniform who have actively intervened in politics, undermined constitutional processes, and facilitated the systematic denial of due process and fundamental rights?

That’s the part I find difficult to understand about your position.

You seem far more outraged by a civilian woman, who has never held power and has spent the last three years trying to get some semblance of due process for her brother making inflammatory comments out of frustration, than by the people who actually possess the power to dismantle institutions and violate the Constitution.

If the principle is “no one is above the law,” I have no problem with that.

But then apply the principle consistently whether the person is Imran Khan, his sister, Maryam Nawaz, or someone wearing a uniform.

 

[Trailer23]

Why do you have to make everything personal?

I’ve been respectful and haven’t called you any names. I’m simply asking you some fairly straightforward questions.

And no, she’s not related to me. I have my own bajis and I’m quite happy with those.

But you’ve still avoided the actual questions I raised.

What exactly was the charge for which Maryam Safdar was temporarily put in that “guest house” jail—with cellphone access and other amenities? Surely it wasn’t treason or sedition; it was a corruption case.

I asked you this previously, and you conveniently ignored it. Is the Constitution supposed to be the supreme law of the land or not? If it is, what should the consequence be for those who openly subvert it? Is undermining the constitutional order somehow less serious than an inflammatory statement made by a civilian?

And if you’re genuinely outraged by threats to the state, shouldn’t that outrage be directed even more strongly at those in uniform who have actively intervened in politics, undermined constitutional processes, and facilitated the systematic denial of due process and fundamental rights?

That’s the part I find difficult to understand about your position.

You seem far more outraged by a civilian woman, who has never held power and has spent the last three years trying to get some semblance of due process for her brother making inflammatory comments out of frustration, than by the people who actually possess the power to dismantle institutions and violate the Constitution.

If the principle is “no one is above the law,” I have no problem with that.

But then apply the principle consistently whether the person is Imran Khan, his sister, Maryam Nawaz, or someone wearing a uniform.

With all the points you've raised..., you & some of the loyal IK/PTI followers have failed to address yourselves.

Q. When Khan-sahab was in power, all his Ministers including Fawad Chaudhry, Faisal Vawda, Hammad Azhar used to regularly state that for the 1st time in history, the Govt. (they) & Military were on the "same page". Fine. I'm cool with that.

When N-Leaguers were being picked up - a la Rana Sanaullah, Khawaja Asif and even Plastic Nani for that matter, where were concerns for the "Constitution"?

Haan - ab jab apnay Leader pay par' rahe hai, tou takleef tou akhir ho ge na.

By the way..., allow me to address something. I didn't call you any names as you pointed out.