I still remember reading reports about Pakistan going for German origin AD systems with a much sleeker layout. Not exactly hard to see why when you put them beside the HQ-9. That thing is bloody huge, big missile, heavy warhead but piss-poor lateral acceleration for something that may have to chase a munition skimming just above the ground. Then during Pelosi visit to Taiwan you have the Americans apparently managing to jam Chinese AESA radars with EW. China has thrown billions upon billions into this stuff for decades. This is their crown jewel hardware.
No idea bro. I don’t really trust these media reports. Until it gets CCS approval, all this talk is just BS to me.
That’s the real question though what exactly could your air force stop mine from doing? If my aircraft can successfully launch stand-off weapons and still wreck your awacs, fighters on the ground, runways, underground C2 facilities, NG-MMCCs and hangars while you can’t stop the hits, what difference does ‘you didn’t come here and dogfight us’ even make? The destroyed targets are still gone.Wow...just wow. Astonishing godi cow dung parjeet logic right there! A2A maybe rare in the rest of the world, but not against the IAF it seems! seem like the IAF is doing a really good job of keeping the global average of A2A kills up
Haha.....desert storm was massively lopsided campaign where Iraq really had nothing to fight the Americans. Not really a test of air combat skill, which is the primary function of a functioning airforce against a comparable foe.
Really, you've seen the pics of AWACS, fighters and "underground facilities" have you?
You came with over 70 fighters, why? That wasn't to hit a few mosques. Ever since 2019 you've been begging for a A2A fight, especially after inducting the Rafales, but you got you asses handed to you on a plate. You then ground your entire airforce for 2 days, then fly a few aircraft 200km inside your own air space, and beat your chest that you achieved something?! Most of the missiles launched were from ground launchers anyway, and the majority were defeated either kinetically or spoofed.Swiss report, the satellite pics and your own broken air force are saying something completely different. Desert Storm was lopsided because one side had proper planning, better weapons and actually knew how to use air power. Same thing happened to PAF in Sindoor. Calling high value targets just Google Maps coordinates is pure cope from you. Those were high value airbases, command centres, hangars, radars and C2 nodes that got systematically hammered. Independent European analysis from the Swiss CHPM think tank flat-out says that by the morning of 10 May the IAF had achieved air superiority over significant portions of Pakistani airspace.Haha.....desert storm was massively lopsided campaign where Iraq really had nothing to fight the Americans. Not really a test of air combat skill, which is the primary function of a functioning airforce against a comparable foe.
There was nothing systematic about the IAF airstrikes. The targets were all stationary and coordinates well known from Google maps. Just program the weapons and launch from far enough to avoid PAF. That was the whole IAF goal latter on, after it took to the sky after two days of grounding according to your CDS, avoid PAF patrols, pity....A lot of the weapons also got spoofed, some did get through though, does not mean IAF had 'control of the sky' ..omg
Our air force was true to its primary purpose, air combat aka aerial ass whoping of IAF. It did not shy away from challenge and ground itself to preserve itself. Infact our UAVs were loitering freely in the airspace vacuum created inside India. Our army rockets and artillery did the bulk of the ground attack, which was their job, and air force did the aerial work. Your air force however had to run away from its primary purpose of air combat and become a rocket force lobbing weapons from long range.
LOL there is nothing to gloat if u can patch ur ships up urself or not, what matters is the incident that took place. Your propaganda machine proclaimed 'no damage' but now your MEA admits 'no major damage'. If past is any indicator that is how Indians try to mask the truth and appear stronger and protect their egos through word salads to avoid scrutiny. Now u proclaim 'no structural damage' LOL , what got damaged then, the ship's 'aatma'.....
Why you shouting so loud, cherry boy? You saw the satellite scars on your own bases and still yapping about mosques? We brought the numbers because we came to break things. You spent the next 3 days watching your hangars, awacs and C2 centres get turned into scrap while your AF stayed grounded or hid. The only ass getting handed was yours, still red from the beating.Really, you've seen the pics of AWACS, fighters and "underground facilities" have you?
So a sub 2.5k ton Romanian patrol boat is somehow supposed to damage a 8k ton destroyer? Which physics class taught you that in Pakistan?LOL there is nothing to gloat if u can patch ur ships up urself or not, what matters is the incident that took place. Your propaganda machine proclaimed 'no damage' but now your MEA admits 'no major damage'. If past is any indicator that is how Indians try to mask the truth and appear stronger and protect their egos through word salads to avoid scrutiny. Now u proclaim 'no structural damage' LOL , what got damaged then, the ship's 'aatma'.....
