Zhuge Liang
Registered Member
First they need to actually change the regime and then make the new one stable. Both are hard things to do.The U.S. wants regime change and won’t stop.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First they need to actually change the regime and then make the new one stable. Both are hard things to do.The U.S. wants regime change and won’t stop.
Their choice of regimes didnt even last 24 hours in kabul and saigon once their troops pulled out.First they need to actually change the regime and then make the new one stable. Both are hard things to do.
At least the Soviet-backed Afghan govt held up for 3 years even though the USSR withdrew all support after 1988.Their choice of regimes didnt even last 24 hours in kabul and saigon once their troops pulled out.![]()
I don’t want to insult the IRGC but this is starting to get rather pathetic given all their aggressive threats
The last thing they want for Iran is stability. They want instability and infighting leaving Israelis to persue its "Greater Israel" project.First they need to actually change the regime and then make the new one stable. Both are hard things to do.
IRGC is expecting the Dems to cutoff the war funding after the mid terms.
Which is a very fair expectation.
Just like Obama rode in from nowhere on the back of anti war - there will be a long line of presidential candidates running on anti war.
Some of them will be prominent senators and congressmen.
Otherwise IRGC will go for Armageddon for survival.
They know the alternative is a balkanisation of Iran.
The last thing they want for Iran is stability. They want instability and infighting leaving Israelis to persue its "Greater Israel" project.
I don’t want to insult the IRGC but this is starting to get rather pathetic given all their aggressive threats
This is not a Trump thing at all.
Zio-US is fighting for its very survival as any kind of world power.
Harris would have done exactly the same.
Deep State controls US foreign policy and not the party or president in power.
On the flip side, Zio-US is on the losing side as China will never allow Iran to fall and become a Zio-US puppet state.
Dems would have maintained the status quo.
There’s zero chance a dem president would have attacked Iran even after Iran surrendered completely on nuclear bombs.
Even the arch Zionist Biden tried to revive the JCPOA.
Meanwhile Qalibaf, Mojtaba, and the useless factions sit around waiting for Trump to seize Kharg Island and the Western oil fields in Ahvaz.
I don’t want to insult the IRGC but this is starting to get rather pathetic given all their aggressive threats
He never did as "Deep State" calls the shots.
Zio-US could not maintain the "status quo" as Iran was getting too powerful.