Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

The way to prevent all this is for Iran to step up OPSEC and not allow these types of meetings to occur in non fortified areas. It’s 2024, meet in a bunker or a tunnel or anywhere on the planet.

Israel cannot find 100 hostages in tiny Gaza with 24/7 satellites. So if you TRY to hide in syria properly then you won’t get so easily targeted. Obviously they found you because you (IRGC) performed very poor operational security of your high value targets.

That is the easiest fix Iran can do and should have done prior to Solemani assassination when the man was using cheap Noika mobile cell phones.

I doubt the iranian officials were "hiding". Weren't they attached with the official embassy staff? It was Iranian consulate (Iranian territory). Its an international law that its your territory. No one should be allowed to hit it. The Iranian officers I believe were on official mission maybe military attache to the diplomatic staff. They weren't even trying to hide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MLK
I doubt the iranian officials were "hiding". Weren't they attached with the official embassy staff? It was Iranian consulate (Iranian territory). Its an international law that its your territory. No one should be allowed to hit it. The Iranian officers I believe were on official mission maybe military attache to the diplomatic staff. They weren't even trying to hide.

It was also international law that it’s illegal to asssiante a General of another country (Iran) on foreign soil (Iraq) during peacetime when invited by the foreign country (Iraq) as a diplomatic ambassador to exchange messages to another country (Saudi Arabia). How did that one work out?

You expect your enemy to follow the rules it created itself to control other countries?


IRGC has to be mighty ignorant to think just because they are all parked in the living quarters of the embassy staff they won’t get targeted by the #1 violator of international law: Israel.

Only Iran abides by these unwritten rules of warfare. Every once an while US and Israel will break all protocol to remove high value cheese pieces off the board then FORCE iran back into the unwritten rules shadow war again. They did this in 2020, they did this in 2021 with Fakhrizadeh, and now in 2024.
 
If Iran attacks Israel, it should also be prepared for potentially unprecedented cyberattacks by Israel against Iranian critical infrastructure.
 
I remember that looney was an Afghan gay Iran hater that ended in permanently banned multiple times

Don't answer the Afghan troll until I have proved he is several times permanently banned and let's see what mods will do about the troll

And this thread is about " foreign affairs "

@Persian Gulf would you please delete the off topics to keep the section clean

I always thought he was a Turkish troll. Either way my comment is about why Iran's foreign strategy has been reluctant to retaliate in a like for like manner to Israel, and lack of public support has been identified as a factor, so I would argue it is on topic.
 
Either way my comment is about why Iran's foreign strategy has been reluctant to retaliate in a like for like manner to Israel,

I assume the reason Iran hasn’t attacked Israel is because they struggled to figure out what can actually deter Israel outside of major battle like a 2006 war. Even Solemani couldn’t solve the equation during his time and he tried multiple forms of attack and threats. I mean Israel happens to have the full backing of the biggest superpower of modern history, if Iran had such a backer than yes it would do the same thing. Even the Shah did a lot of ballsy things when he knew America wouldn’t say anything to him.

I think the only way the attacks stop is that Iran and Israel get into a 2006 type short war (1-3 months) then a ceasefire is indirectly negotiated using US/China as intermediaries and in that ceasefire it stipulates that Israel cannot conduct attack on Iranian forces in foreign countries during the ceasefire.

That is probably the only way you end this shadow war. Some type of major overt event needs to happen and both sides need to agree to a few deescalation demands of the other. Or else this shadow war will go on forever until one country implodes or has a MAJOR change of foreign policy.
 
Dear its you saying this. An ordinary citizen. Just like Pakistanis say when they hear about accusations of attack by Iran. That why the hell on earth Pakistan will do this.

Its quite obvious that your government or security establishment (IRGC etc) thinks otherwise. The wordings of that official is in front of you. Iranian govt NEVER wanted a stable baluchistan / Gwadar. They always thought Gwadar will undermine Chahbahar. They asked india to fund it. India is an enemy no.1 for Pakistan. Indian RAW agent Kulbushan Jadav was arrested from Pak-Iran border carrying Iranian passport. Your government needs to understand that this policy is not working. Pakistan also needs to understand this. Only solution is in collaboration. Both countries should wish for success for both ports & trade routes. This is possible but policy change is required.
All the text you wrote is wrong. For Iran, there are much more important threats than a random port in Pakistan.

Insecurity in Baluchistan is detrimental to Iran. Iran never seeks insecurity in its neighborhood.
 
Thats a massive assumption to say that all of the 60% were following the orders to boycotts. They could have been lazy, too busy, not believers of democracy as is the case with certain religious sects in Iran, etc. Even if we entertain your assumption that all 60% are traitors, then that further proves my point that the reason why Iran is not instigating a war through its reluctance in retaliation is because 60% traitors would be impossible to manage in a war. So there you have it.
the answer is that some people are afraid of martyrdom and only prescribe it for other.
on the election matter. traditionally 30-40% didn't participate . the call for boy-cut resulted in another 20 - 30 percent join them and everybody who call them traitor is traitor himself they are just tired of certain policies and practices you just fix those problem and be more serious about fighting corruption then you see how many people participate. my prediction is if current course of policies continue in the next election we even have less turn out and calling people traitor and dividing the country into inner circle and outsiders are part of those policies
 
Its quite obvious that your government or security establishment (IRGC etc) thinks otherwise. The wordings of that official is in front of you. Iranian govt NEVER wanted a stable baluchistan / Gwadar. They always thought Gwadar will undermine Chahbahar.
why Iran provide electricity for gwadar
 
Understanding the outcome of the Israeli bombing of #Syria since 2013, and the assassination of Iranian generals:

The first thing to understand, is the reason why Israel and Americans bomb Syria and assassinate Iranian generals. The reason is very simple. Iran is arming the Levant with all the weapons it can, and building an infrastructure that enables the region to have strike capabilities against Israel.

We are seeing a small part of the fruits of these efforts today with the bombing of Israeli sites from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

These bombings on Syria are what Israel calls ''The war between the wars''. The goal is to disrupt the infrastructure building and armament pipeline that Iran is supplying. Iran sends weapon shipments via land routes, but also through air cargo, that's why the Damascus and Aleppo airports keep getting bombed, it's to disrupt the shipments.

The killing of Soleimani and other Iranian generals is within this context. The American occupation of Syria (Yellow Kurdish area, and green Al-Tanf base on the Jordanian borders) is aimed to disrupt these routes as well as strangle the Syrian state economically by occupying the oilfields and farmlands.

However, these strikes and occupations are not enough to halt the project. Stopping such project requires a full scale war on the region. What Americans and Israel are doing is imposing a cost on the continuation of this project and trying to slow it down, however the Syrian state, Iran, and the resistance groups keep doubling down and expanding their arsenals. 100,000 armed Hezbollah fighters is the fruit of these supply lines.

Although still in it's infancy, there are efforts to open supply routes to the West Bank through Jordan, and shipments sometimes get bombed by Jordan under the pretext of ''fighting drug cartels'' (who bombs drug dealers with F16's ?).

Although the assassinations of generals is painful and make Iran look weak , the reality lies elsewhere: Are these assassinations achieving the strategic goal of stopping the Iranian routes? Nawwaf Al Moussawi, a Hezbollah official, stated that today Hezbollah's supplies are replenished in 1 month, the equivalent of what they were receiving in 6months before October 7th. In the middle of the war, these routes supply Hezbollah 6 times faster than before.

The strikes on Syria and the assassinations are hurtful jabs that don't disrupt the project, and they are expected: it's the price to wage resistance. It's what Jordan and Egypt are not doing - they are security providers for Israel, they combat arm shipments and don't engage in an arms race with Israel as stipulated in the security deals with Israel.

Americans and Israel know that assassinating generals don't halt the project, however they bring big political scores in domestic politics. Trumps is seen as a ''hero who killed Soleimani'', and Netanyahu's assassination two days ago is a show of strength that inspires a much needed confidence in the Israeli internal front.

It should be noted that these strikes are not really military achievements, they are done in the most coward and cheapest way possible, through terrorism. Soleimani was on an official announced diplomatic visit to Iraq , he got assassinated in his car convoy outside of the Baghdad airport, and the generals two days ago got assassinated in the consulate. These are not military feats, it's just plain cowardice and terrorism.

Iran will respond on this strike because it's a strike on it's land, and not responding opens the door for the normalization of such strikes on Iranian land. The response will come to avoid this change in the rules of engagement, but at the same time in a way that doesn't lead to a full scale war. It will be a similar response to Solemani's assassination, just enough to prevent the normalization of such strikes.
 
I agree, let Israel scramble, let their population sweat

Just keep supplying the resistance forces, don't let Israel off the hook

Just look at the last 6 months, by enlarge Iranians have been fine, whilst Israel has destroyed it's international standing, lost thousands of citizens, had to Jew tens of billions out of the west and gradually it's own demonic behaviour has started to devour Israel itself and Israel is becoming a pariah state

As much as Iranians might want revenge, at the moment you are causing Israel far far more pain by supporting and supplying the constant resistance across the region against Israel
As I mentioned before the solution is retaliation AND keeping the status quo which is the highest priority. Iran is well capable to do that. As such, a 'retaliation' will not have the soothing effect the Lollipop Guild is looking for. I hope I'm wrong and we'll see.

At the end, Iran needs to plug its security leaks so these conditions do not occur.
 
Understanding the outcome of the Israeli bombing of #Syria since 2013, and the assassination of Iranian generals:

The first thing to understand, is the reason why Israel and Americans bomb Syria and assassinate Iranian generals. The reason is very simple. Iran is arming the Levant with all the weapons it can, and building an infrastructure that enables the region to have strike capabilities against Israel.

We are seeing a small part of the fruits of these efforts today with the bombing of Israeli sites from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

These bombings on Syria are what Israel calls ''The war between the wars''. The goal is to disrupt the infrastructure building and armament pipeline that Iran is supplying. Iran sends weapon shipments via land routes, but also through air cargo, that's why the Damascus and Aleppo airports keep getting bombed, it's to disrupt the shipments.

The killing of Soleimani and other Iranian generals is within this context. The American occupation of Syria (Yellow Kurdish area, and green Al-Tanf base on the Jordanian borders) is aimed to disrupt these routes as well as strangle the Syrian state economically by occupying the oilfields and farmlands.

However, these strikes and occupations are not enough to halt the project. Stopping such project requires a full scale war on the region. What Americans and Israel are doing is imposing a cost on the continuation of this project and trying to slow it down, however the Syrian state, Iran, and the resistance groups keep doubling down and expanding their arsenals. 100,000 armed Hezbollah fighters is the fruit of these supply lines.

Although still in it's infancy, there are efforts to open supply routes to the West Bank through Jordan, and shipments sometimes get bombed by Jordan under the pretext of ''fighting drug cartels'' (who bombs drug dealers with F16's ?).

Although the assassinations of generals is painful and make Iran look weak , the reality lies elsewhere: Are these assassinations achieving the strategic goal of stopping the Iranian routes? Nawwaf Al Moussawi, a Hezbollah official, stated that today Hezbollah's supplies are replenished in 1 month, the equivalent of what they were receiving in 6months before October 7th. In the middle of the war, these routes supply Hezbollah 6 times faster than before.

The strikes on Syria and the assassinations are hurtful jabs that don't disrupt the project, and they are expected: it's the price to wage resistance. It's what Jordan and Egypt are not doing - they are security providers for Israel, they combat arm shipments and don't engage in an arms race with Israel as stipulated in the security deals with Israel.

Americans and Israel know that assassinating generals don't halt the project, however they bring big political scores in domestic politics. Trumps is seen as a ''hero who killed Soleimani'', and Netanyahu's assassination two days ago is a show of strength that inspires a much needed confidence in the Israeli internal front.

It should be noted that these strikes are not really military achievements, they are done in the most coward and cheapest way possible, through terrorism. Soleimani was on an official announced diplomatic visit to Iraq , he got assassinated in his car convoy outside of the Baghdad airport, and the generals two days ago got assassinated in the consulate. These are not military feats, it's just plain cowardice and terrorism.

Iran will respond on this strike because it's a strike on it's land, and not responding opens the door for the normalization of such strikes on Iranian land. The response will come to avoid this change in the rules of engagement, but at the same time in a way that doesn't lead to a full scale war. It will be a similar response to Solemani's assassination, just enough to prevent the normalization of such strikes.
EXACTLY. This is terribly obvious. Just not obvious enough for the emotional.
 
At least the western camp seems to have a different view.
They are increasingly confident that Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq are all significantly weaker and easier partners for the United States and Israel.
Even within Israel, there is honesty in the opinion that this is an easy fight with fewer casualties than in past wars.
The view that Iran lacks the courage and means to fight back has taken hold in Japan.
This is quite different from the attitude toward North Korea, which is so feared that no one can touch it.
The West sees Iran as weak and lacking courage, and this surely invites the next danger.
Unfortunately, it must be said that Iran's clerics lack the strong will of Kim Jong-un.
 
the answer is that some people are afraid of martyrdom and only prescribe it for other.
on the election matter. traditionally 30-40% didn't participate . the call for boy-cut resulted in another 20 - 30 percent join them and everybody who call them traitor is traitor himself they are just tired of certain policies and practices you just fix those problem and be more serious about fighting corruption then you see how many people participate. my prediction is if current course of policies continue in the next election we even have less turn out and calling people traitor and dividing the country into inner circle and outsiders are part of those policies

If you are living in a country which is protecting you and the leader calls you to fight against the disbelievers and zalimeen, then you must obey him otherwise you become a munafiq traitor. You can name call all you want, which you have a habit of doing, but I will NEVER move on this point and what I will say next. This is etched into Islamic Law, but some
people like to pick and choose when to be Islamic to suit their own agenda.

If those who live lives of luxury in Iran, especially north of Tehran, don't understand this then they need to get the hell out of Iran. Moft o majani mikhoran va kha'engari-ham mikhan anjam
bedan? Too many people gave their lives in the last war to protect Iran against evil to have people acting treacherously with the enemy over a stupid veil law. These are all petty excuses to behave like traitors and they will pay the price either way, because if and when war comes and they are destined to die, then they will die either as cowards or they can choose to fight and die like real heroes. Their fate won't change either way.
 
Last edited:
The War in Gaza has already cost Israel 53bln dollars.

Israel is known as a nation of software developers and start-ups. Tech sector is 12% of Israel's workforce, 18% of Israel's GDP, 50% of Israel's exports and 30% of tax revenues.

Look at this giant Intel semiconductor fabrication plant in Kiryat Gat in Israel. It costs tens of billions of dollars - 30 Iranian ballistic missiles can destroy the entire site.
sdd.jpg

3 ballistic missiles can be enough for Intel headquarter in Haifa
sdsd.jpg

There are multiple offices and sites of major tech companies in Israel including:
Intel
Google
Microsoft
Apple
IBM
Cisco
Facebook
Amazon
Oracle
Qualcomm
Nvidia
Broadcom
HP
Dell
eBay
PayPal
SAP
EMC (now part of Dell Technologies)
AOL
Check Point Software Technologies
Mellanox Technologies (acquired by Nvidia)
Mobileye (acquired by Intel)
Waze (acquired by Google)

If there is full out war between Iran and Israel, in addition to powerplants, desalination plants and ports, Iran can destroy all tech sector sites in Israel with Shahed-136 drones, cruise and ballistic missiles.

This will discourage major tech companies from investing in Israel and eventually ruin Israel's economy.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top