When all the sides are foolish and playing right into the hands of the zionists plans, and giving it to them on a platter.......what else can be said?
We're now looking at greater ME war, and this will turn into disaster when all the infrastructure is targetted and destroyed. It will also end the petrodollar and end the empire in the process. The americans are again bringing their war machines and naval strike groups into the area. Go figure why they even need to be here.
the zionists will win with this as they will achieve total control on mideast. Everyone else will be losers, and that's including iran.
I am discussing only matters of military strategy, not political issues. Based on currently available information, Israel has not intervened—either directly or indirectly—in the Yemeni civil war; therefore, it falls outside the scope of this analysis.
Do you consider fighting terrorists who serve as proxies to Iranian mullahs is wrong? Creating state within a state has rightly been globally rejected.
Also, what if these terrorists become strong enough to really capable of chocking global trade? Is it better to root them out and dismantle them now or wait until they become really stronger.
Don't think Houthis will keep serving only Iranian mullahs. Proxies are ever ready to serve whoever throws a bone to them. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel and others start arming Houthis to choke Chinese trade with Europe.
I analyze only military strategies, not political stances; I personally hold no position on these events.
Throughout the course of human civilization, history has been written by the victors. There is no such thing as a perfect moral judgment; what is termed "good" or "evil" is merely a matter of differing perspectives held by different people.
Let me remind you:
The current Syrian regime is viewed by many nations as a group of "terrorists," yet this has not prevented many Pakistanis on this forum from supporting them.
From a broader historical perspective, almost all "successful groups" in the world were regarded as "rebels" by the mainstream society of their time during their early stages of development (before the concept of "terrorist" even existed)—including the Communist Party of China.
As for the impact of this war on China, it is not appropriate to discuss it here.
The Saudis definitely don't. They are clearly incompetent. However, if Pakistan or Turkiye leads the operation, Houthis will soon find themselves very hard pressed.
I wouldn't look at the issue that way. In fact, I believe Pakistan is already making a huge mistake by transporting weapons to Aden.
Proxy wars: When the masterminds behind the scenes step in to fight directly, they have already lost. Pakistan is currently adding fuel to the fire, accelerating Saudi Arabia's defeat in this conflict.
Let me cite a few real-world examples:
The Chinese Civil War (1945–1949): The US government strongly supported the ROC government and its military. However, much of the vast quantity of advanced weaponry supplied by the US ended up—intact—in the hands of the CCP's PLA. This bolstered the PLA's strength, ultimately leading to the CCP's victory in the civil war.
Afghanistan: The US-backed Afghan government forces received massive shipments of weapons, yet a significant portion fell into Taliban hands. This steadily increased the Taliban's military capabilities...
Much of the weaponry and equipment Saudi Arabia supplied to the Yemeni government forces has ended up with the Houthi rebels, thereby enhancing the Houthis' combat capabilities. If the MDA continues to provide large quantities of advanced arms to the Yemeni government forces, the Houthis' combat capabilities will only grow stronger...
Once the Houthis' combat capabilities reach a certain level, even if the MDA nations intervene directly, victory in the war is by no means guaranteed. ------ You need to understand that each of the three MDA nations faces major military challenges of its own; they cannot commit their entire armed forces to the conflict in Yemen.
It is "people"—not weapons—that ultimately determine the course of a war. When "people" are plagued by critical, fatal flaws, even the finest weaponry cannot save the situation.
