Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

When it comes to Fatah IV ER, I think they have finally taken the range to 1000 KM which should be further increased. That being said, Pakistan needs a combination of subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic missiles, along with long range kamikaze drones for strikes deep inside India's most important urban centers.
 
When it comes to Fatah IV ER, I think they have finally taken the range to 1000 KM which should be further increased. That being said, Pakistan needs a combination of subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic missiles, along with long range kamikaze drones for strikes deep inside India's most important urban centers.
For its important that:
1) Can India stop it?
2) How many number can be made and how quickly?
 
For its important that:
1) Can India stop it?
2) How many number can be made and how quickly?
1. Yes, but it won't be easy.
2. These aren't spam missiles, these are for the end game to be used against HVTs after LMs and LR Kamikaze drones have depleted their air defenses.
 
1. Yes, but it won't be easy.
2. These aren't spam missiles, these are for the end game to be used against HVTs after LMs and LR Kamikaze drones have depleted their air defenses.
Speed has no substitute. Pakistan must invest in it, we need to be able to very cheaply manufacture supersonic and hypersonic weapons for true strike capability and conventional deterrence. Pakistan must join hands with China, Turkey and start double time. Nowadays this technology isn't cheap but as time goes on it will become compact, modular and cheap .......
 
When it comes to Fatah IV ER, I think they have finally taken the range to 1000 KM which should be further increased. That being said, Pakistan needs a combination of subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic missiles, along with long range kamikaze drones for strikes deep inside India's most important urban centers.
I would like to add that that Pakistan also needs ALBM in its arsenal.
 
When it comes to Fatah IV ER, I think they have finally taken the range to 1000 KM which should be further increased. That being said, Pakistan needs a combination of subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic missiles, along with long range kamikaze drones for strikes deep inside India's most important urban centers.
Reviewing the pattern, it seems Pakistan's military has always been very North India-focused, never exceeding 200- 400 km from the Pakistan border. to inflict pain and damage fear, Pakistan should implement attack capability across all of Bharat mata. All parts need to feel the pain, not just the northern section. For that, Pakistan needs to invest heavily in areas that are long-range, cheap, and can be deployed in numbers.
 
For that, you need a double engine fighter jet.

Hi, I wanted to politely correct you on that.

The Turkish family of ALBMs can be fired from F16s and their drones.


Israel launched ALBMs on Iran from some of their F16s.


These missiles were launched at Pakistani targets by the IAF also. I am sure they did some damage. But hey, losses are part of combat. Lol!

 
Last edited:
The Turkish family of ALBMs can be fired from F16s and their drones.
Israel launched ALBMs on Iran from some of their F16s.
This issue brings us back to square one:
To date, there is no universally agreed-upon, precise definition of a ballistic missile; different countries employ different definitions.
What exactly constitutes a "ballistic missile"? The criteria vary completely depending on the country and the context.

If we consider only "ballistic trajectory" and "guidance," then many guided rocket systems fit these characteristics perfectly—meeting the definition of a ballistic missile in those terms—yet no one classifies them as such.
If we use the requirement that the missile's apogee must cross the "Kármán line" as the criterion, then almost all short-range ballistic missiles fail to qualify; nevertheless, they are still commonly classified as ballistic missiles.

The "Fire Dragon 480" (火龙-480) guided rockets used by China's PHL-191 MLRS are generally regarded as tactical ballistic missiles, while the US classifies North Korea's KN-25 super-large multiple rocket launcher system as a short-range ballistic missile.

So, what you choose to call them doesn't really matter.
Hi, the CM400AKG launched from a JF17, which destroyed a S400 radar is an ALBM.
In all official Chinese definitions, the CM400AKG has never been classified as an ALBM.

Officially, it is defined as an air-to-ground or anti-ship missile. The official text states that its design incorporated certain technologies from air-launched ballistic missiles (ALBMs)—and that is all. However, it does not classify as an ALBM.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top