Hussain
Trusted Member
add this to the list:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
add this to the list:
Lest, the one calling apostasy be led by unbelievers...It takes two hands to shake hands. The believers if they were united, would never be disunited, and if they were never united, will they be called as believers?
And an unknown premier.Yes, modern nation states, in English defined, who have a King named Charles.
Aah... a judge, jury and executionior... egging his acolytes!The Yemenis have been judged to be unfit for governance ever since times of Sheba when they couldn't maintain their built dam. No one wants a dysfunctional lawless land next to their ambitions.
Yeah... anything...Suggest me a hobby with the definite power of older wisdom. It will be respected.
Fassad and Fitna are not tools of the believers.Lest, the one calling apostasy be led by unbelievers...
But that is neither here nor there ... your gripe is aimed at protecting the established.
You're saying why repeat the same...
We... nation state
Bygones be Bygones.
Aah... a judge, jury and executionior... egging his acolytes!
Yemenis beg to differ...
Join in with the PMC... maybe they pay in Euros too
Me?Fassad and Fitna are not tools of the believers.
You want an established status quo of senseless infighting of your believers.
Yeah right..Yemenis should take it up with the one who destroyed their dam, the one who would not make home in Yemeni House and the one who destroyed their elephants.
Houthies are one of the tools
Admittedly, I have been away from the Middle Eastern geopolitics for several weeks due to some recent exhaustive travels; still trying to understand whats going on in the region to the west of Pakistan. Here is my understanding after watching some videos, especially by the greats like Chas Freeman and Elijah Magnier:
The 'Saudis' attacked a plane landing in Sana (Yemen) which had an Iranian delegation but the Saudis denied that attack and I tend to believe they had no reason to re-ignite the hostilities with the Houthies. Maybe a false flag involving Israel? Maybe the pro Saudi faction/loose cannons did that attack? But the Houthies response has been too much to that despite the Saudi denial of the attack. The Iranians say they have no control over the Houthies but some reports say the Iranians asked the Houthies to escalate the war against Saudi Arabia, which the Houthies are obliging? And the rationale for the Iranians is that they don't want enough oil to flow out of the Middle East because that reduces Iran's leverage. Iran, for some understandable reasons, would rather burn down the region if Iran itself is getting burned down; it has become their survival strategy. And the Houthies are one of the tools in that strategy.
And sadly, the Houthies, like the Afghan Taliban, don't have much to lose and so are willing to lose it all. And the bottom line is that Iran has painted itself into a corner where it gets a lot of credit for Iran's standing up for the Palestinians but when does standing up for the 5-10 million Palestinians stand vs the interests of hundreds of millions of those whose lives are going to be destroyed in case of a regional war?
Saudi denied,The 'Saudis' attacked a plane landing in Sana (Yemen) which had an Iranian delegation but the Saudis denied that attack
Saudis did not attack the plane, they attacked the runway of the airport as a warning shot due to the Houthis bringing back Iranian military personnelle with them as they returned from the funeral service, which Saudis already told them previously that this is a red line and would be considered a provocation.Admittedly, I have been away from the Middle Eastern geopolitics for several weeks due to some recent exhaustive travels; still trying to understand whats going on in the region to the west of Pakistan. Here is my understanding after watching some videos, especially by the greats like Chas Freeman and Elijah Magnier:
The 'Saudis' attacked a plane landing in Sana (Yemen) which had an Iranian delegation but the Saudis denied that attack and I tend to believe they had no reason to re-ignite the hostilities with the Houthies. Maybe a false flag involving Israel? Maybe the pro Saudi faction/loose cannons did that attack? But the Houthies response has been too much to that despite the Saudi denial of the attack. The Iranians say they have no control over the Houthies but some reports say the Iranians asked the Houthies to escalate the war against Saudi Arabia, which the Houthies are obliging? And the rationale for the Iranians is that they don't want enough oil to flow out of the Middle East because that reduces Iran's leverage. Iran, for some understandable reasons, would rather burn down the region if Iran itself is getting burned down; it has become their survival strategy. And the Houthies are one of the tools in that strategy.
And sadly, the Houthies, like the Afghan Taliban, don't have much to lose and so are willing to lose it all. And the bottom line is that Iran has painted itself into a corner where it gets a lot of credit for Iran's standing up for the Palestinians but when does standing up for the 5-10 million Palestinians stand vs the interests of hundreds of millions of those whose lives are going to be destroyed in case of a regional war?
No, they would claim Pak/Turk are killing those resisting zios...which would be a valid claim.Now all troll will cry that Pak Turkiye both countries are killing innocent people. they will play victim card