Makkah Defence Alliance: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, news & updates

So if Syria joins, and then Israel bomb Syria which they have been doing for sometime, will Turkiye, KSA and Pakistan go to full fledged War with Israel ? or they will be like, nah its Syrian's internal problem? we have seen that with Houthis and it makes sense as Houthis are not some non Muslim Country that attack KSA, but Israel is. I think MDA will be mocked even more if Syria joined, wait for another 5-7 years then it would make sense.
 
So if Syria joins, and then Israel bomb Syria which they have been doing for sometime, will Turkiye, KSA and Pakistan go to full fledged War with Israel ? or they will be like, nah its Syrian's internal problem? we have seen that with Houthis and it makes sense as Houthis are not some non Muslim Country that attack KSA, but Israel is. I think MDA will be mocked even more if Syria joined, wait for another 5-7 years then it would make sense.

There is no rush only a few years ago the americans, the russians, the isrealis, the english and french were conducting bombing campaigns across syria. Meanwhile syria was split into multiple competing factions backed by various nefarious players. Today its one nation under one leadership and all that remains are the isrealis lashing out. It may take another 10 years, but what's the rush. Muslims already endured a few hundred years of great turmoil, Syria will survive another 10 years of Israeli aggression.
 
So if Syria joins, and then Israel bomb Syria which they have been doing for sometime, will Turkiye, KSA and Pakistan go to full fledged War with Israel ? or they will be like, nah its Syrian's internal problem? we have seen that with Houthis and it makes sense as Houthis are not some non Muslim Country that attack KSA, but Israel is. I think MDA will be mocked even more if Syria joined, wait for another 5-7 years then it would make sense.
Turkey wants to share the burden of running and defending Syria , not sure Saudi Arabia and Pakistan will agree at this stage.... Syria is expressing her desire to join and desire doesn't mean acceptance.
 
There is no rush only a few years ago the americans, the russians, the isrealis, the english and french were conducting bombing campaigns across syria. Meanwhile syria was split into multiple competing factions backed by various nefarious players. Today its one nation under one leadership and all that remains are the isrealis lashing out. It may take another 10 years, but what's the rush. Muslims already endured a few hundred years of great turmoil, Syria will survive another 10 years of Israeli aggression.
I agree, a united Syria is needed and Jolani may not be the best leader but it is what it is, but i don't see the reason to hasten Syrian admission to MDA when all 3 countries know that if Israel decided to bomb Syria no one will attack Israel because papa America will be there. So what will happen that Israel out of their spite they will bomb Syria to undermine MDA if Syria actually join, and Israel will not have to answer anyone because Jolani is ex-AQ, and world hasn't fully accepted the new more Sunni leanned Govt.
 
Turkey wants to share the burden of running and defending Syria , not sure Saudi Arabia and Pakistan will agree at this stage.... Syria is expressing her desire to join and desire doesn't mean acceptance.
Turkiye is making a mistake, and i think its a bad decision, Syria needs time/investment and most important they need to re-establish their image in front of the world, right now Israel can bomb any location under the guise of "Terrorists", heck they even tried to take out Jolani not long ago when they bombed Syrian presidential palace.
 
You are actually supporting Syrian case for joining Mecca Defense Alliance.
Any country that joins the alliance brings its assets and liabilities with it on to the table. Syria potentially will have no direct conflict with any of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, or Pakistan. Also, Israel is a common enemy for all four states.
TBH, Syria has better chance, ever better than that of Egypt, of joining the alliance.

Another aspect for an aspiring state is the approval from the current member countries, especially the Turkish constitutional requirements. Turkish parliament has to approval any foreign deployments of Turkish armed forces and military assets. Syria is probably the most likely state to get such as approval with relative ease.


Not exactly that easy my friend lol.. there are extremely huge financial commitments to help convert the out dated Syrian military to use and support it with lots of approved new equipment. And Training.

Syrian Military have still Soviet era equipment in service, most of its none runner or lack of spares I don't thing old MIG's and T-72/ T - 55s are exactly what the Pact wants. .


One of the requirements for any country to join the Mecca Pack we should have a clause that says there military interoperability. Meaning new candidates must have some of their military must be interoperable with Mecca Pact. weapons and well as tactics be able to operate with Mecca Pack.
 
Not exactly that easy my friend lol.. there are extremely huge financial commitments to help convert the out dated Syrian military to use and support it with lots of approved new equipment. And Training.

Syrian Military have still Soviet era equipment in service, most of its none runner or lack of spares I don't thing old MIG's and T-72/ T - 55s are exactly what the Pact wants. .


One of the requirements for any country to join the Mecca Pack we should have a clause that says there military interoperability. Meaning new candidates must have some of their military must be interoperable with Mecca Pact. weapons and well as tactics be able to operate with Mecca Pack.
What they can't provide in weapons, they can provide in men.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top