Balochistan Terrorism Watch

[RescueRanger]

Security forces eliminated 17 terrorists during separate intelligence-based operations (IBOs) in Balochistan's Kachhi and Kharan districts, the military's media wing said on Tuesday.

According to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the operations were conducted on November 1 following reports about the presence of terrorists belonging to what it described as the Indian proxies "Fitna Al Hindustan" and "Fitna Al Khawarij".

In Kachhi district, security forces carried out an IBO in the Sanni area, where they thwarted an attempt by terrorists to establish a roadblock in the city through “proactive action”, the statement said.

Ten terrorists were killed during the operation, while weapons and ammunition were also recovered, according to the ISPR.

In a separate operation in Kharan district, security forces busted a terrorist hideout, leading to an intense exchange of fire in which seven terrorists were killed.

Weapons and ammunition were also recovered during the Kharan operation.

Sepoy Hikmat Ullah. — ISPR
However, Sepoy Hikmat Ullah was martyred during the exchange of fire, the military's media wing said. The 25-year-old soldier belonged to Karak district.

The ISPR said sanitisation operations were underway to eliminate any other terrorists found in the area.

It added that security forces and law enforcement agencies would continue their counterterrorism campaign under the "Azm-e-Istehkam" initiative approved by the Federal Apex Committee on the National Action Plan to eliminate foreign-sponsored and supported terrorism from the country.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Looks like they're taking these COIN ops as seriously as Gen Tikka Khan....

 

[Mrc]

IRGC affliated accounts are now posting this

Did it reach Afghanistan or China?

 

[muz]

Did it reach Afghanistan or China?

Afghanistan last i heard

 

[hussain0216]

this shit looks good, it was about time Pakistan stopped using that cheap quadcopters.

It's a cost issue

We now have a array of drones and other hardware, but firing a missile that might cost 30000 at some idiots isn't always cost effective, especially with our budget

One 30,000 missile could fund a small school in a rural village or areas


The Quadcopter drops cheap munitions which we can make by the million


As a result we need to balance out our plans with cost in mind

 

[muz]

 

[Mujahid]

Fake bugti incompetence is a gift that just keeps on giving

Give thanks to bastard Musharraf and his fear and nearsighted policies of US and NATO appeasement back in 2001. If he wouldn’t have bowed down to evangelical christian/crusaders demand and few dollars for his family we would have kept Afghanistan in our pockets but we choose our own self destruction.

Now we have enemies on all borders except China, for now, destroyed economy, and half country in chaos.

 

[Intervention-06]

Give thanks to bastard Musharraf and his fear and nearsighted policies of US and NATO appeasement back in 2001. If he wouldn’t have bowed down to evangelical christian/crusaders demand and few dollars for his family we would have kept Afghanistan in our pockets but we choose our own self destruction.

Now we have enemies on all borders except China, for now, destroyed economy, and half country in chaos.

How was it in your pockets ? ok Musharaf bastard tik he but how was Afghanistan in Pakistans pocket ? Pakistan couldn’t hold Bangladesh in his pockets - Kashmir still not in pocket and Baloch and KP are going out of pocket.

 

[Watandar]

How was it in your pockets ? ok Musharaf bastard tik he but how was Afghanistan in Pakistans pocket ? Pakistan couldn’t hold Bangladesh in his pockets - Kashmir still not in pocket and Baloch and KP are going out of pocket.

Before 2001, Pakistani products were heavily imported and sold in Afghanistan and enjoyed dominant status in the Afghan market. Pakistan-made cars, clothes, food, electronic appliances you name it. Pakistan would also import Afghan products like fruit and consume some domestically and export the rest, so Afghanistan depended on Pakistani ports for its global exports as well. We have lost all of this now.

 

[Blain2]

Before 2001, Pakistani products were heavily imported and sold in Afghanistan and enjoyed dominant status in the Afghan market. Pakistan-made cars, clothes, food, electronic appliances you name it. Pakistan would also import Afghan products like fruit and consume some domestically and export the rest, so Afghanistan depended on Pakistani ports for its global exports as well. We have lost all of this now.

No thanks! 600 Pakistanis mass murdered in 2026, thousands more in 2025, 2024 by Afghanistan and its affiliated proxies.

Unless the thugs sitting in Kabul/Kandahar change their policies, they can lump the trade.

 

[Blain2]

Give thanks to bastard Musharraf and his fear and nearsighted policies of US and NATO appeasement back in 2001. If he wouldn’t have bowed down to evangelical christian/crusaders demand and few dollars for his family we would have kept Afghanistan in our pockets but we choose our own self destruction.

Now we have enemies on all borders except China, for now, destroyed economy, and half country in chaos.

He did not pocket a penny and that is the truth of it.

Second, you have the benefit of hindsight, he did not.

Afghanistan was never in your/our pocket. That was the pipe dream of our Pakhtun intelligentsia (military, government and bureaucracy) which has evaporated (remember the famous "everything will be fine"?) after backfiring massively on the entire of Pakistan.

Our enemies were always our enemies, the sell-out Taliban bastards (who bit the hand that fed them), and the usual suspects across our Eastern borders. Not sure why people such as yourself are so confused about this.

 

[Blain2]

That's fine. I was merely answering a member's query.

I was making a policy statement about no appeasement and no surrender to takfiri mass murder and blackmail.

 

[Blain2]

Give thanks to bastard Musharraf and his fear and nearsighted policies of US and NATO appeasement back in 2001. If he wouldn’t have bowed down to evangelical christian/crusaders demand and few dollars

Pakistan had no other choice.

a) Not side with the US.
The US had already been talking to Indians about basing. Pakistan did not want the narrative to completely swing in India's direction and then not have a say in Afghanistan. Staying engaged with the US allowed Pakistan some room to maneuver, giving in a little, but also gaining a little.

b) US had invaded Afghanistan.
Taliban were operating from our tribal areas. Those Taliban would attack the US troops and run back into Pakistan. US was going to push into Pakistan's tribal areas with ground forces. What was Pakistan to do? Take on the US/ISAF militarily with our troops and see Pakistani cities and infrastructure get destroyed?

c) There was nothing "nearsighted" about Pakistan's policies. It allowed Pakistan to have to balance everything and thus get called out for "running with the hare and hunting with the hounds". This was Musharraf trying to manage the situation so Pakistan would be able to keep its leverage and interests as intact as possible.

d) Most suggestions like yours just end at the wishful "he should not have done it". Game the entire series out and see what great choices Pakistan had. This talk track is similar to how some claim now in all their wisdom "Pakistan should not have gotten involved in the Afghan jihad in 1979".

I happened to be around both times, and none of the choices roughly 30 years apart were that easy.

 

[Goenitz]

No thanks! 600 Pakistanis mass murdered in 2026, thousands more in 2025, 2024 by Afghanistan and its affiliated proxies.

Unless the thugs sitting in Kabul/Kandahar change their policies, they can lump the trade.

just saying

 

[Areesh]

Emotional paragraphs on pro bla fb pages after local baloch in Noshki lynched two bla terrorists for target killing a local baloch of noshki



Low iq cartoons