last-soul
Registered Member
No, I disagree. I think Iran calculated this precisely. Now its the Zionists turn, should they respond, you can pretty much bank on Irans onslaught to be ruthless this time round.
Iran launches Operation True Promise - massive missile/drone strikes across Israel, Israel allegedly responds with quadcopters
- Thread starter Mehdipersian
- Start date
- Status
Shadihassan28
Registered Member
First attack was for show second one if and it is a big if if Israel responds I am sure that’s what will come next
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
mulj
Trusted Member
@Persian Gulf this american had enough time for his jerk session please thread ban him until next opportunity for him to rant.
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
please report offending posts and team will review
majesticpug
Registered Member
Besides the interception, it's the electronics. Sanctioned for over 20+ years, Iran's electronics are shabby and what goes on in their missiles could be proned to interference.
What's holding Iran from buying China's DF17 to test all the Israel and American anti-air systems? This alone will change the geopolitical and military balance in the ME. No need of big quantity.. just six batteries will turn the tide. It's not strategic that will threaten American and European soils and so they should shut up. It's a hypersonic glide vehicle and not the predictable BM and its path is beyond the engagement range of F15 or F22. Standard 6 could theorectically engage DF17's flight height but no way to predict its path and angle of attack until its very late hypersonic attacking stage.
F-22Raptor
Elite Member
gambit
Professional
Firstly, the Israelis and allies do not care if anyone believe the interception claims, or not.
Here is why...And I will simplify a bit...
1- Parking lot
2- Hospital
3- Electrical station
4- Army HQ
5- Bank building
Which is most important? 2- Hospital, of course.
Army HQ is more an administrative/bureaucracy structure than an actual war planning office.
Next important is 3- Electrical station.
If five missiles launched, each against the five targets listed, and only items 2 and 3 were intercepted, that would be %100 successful interception. Because items 1, 4, and 5 are tactically irrelevant. Go ahead and destroy them. The post war records will show that the hospital and the power station were successfully defended despite repeated attacks, and that is what matters in terms of technical aspects and combat tactics.
So, drawing from Desert Storm experience, air defense for the hospital is more from accident than from deliberate attack, whereas, the power station would be the deliberate attack. We would deploy air defense for the hospital for humanitarian reason, whereas, air defense for the power station is for genuine combat tactics. Would Iran launch a missile against an Israeli hospital? We do not know and basically, we do not care. The hospital must be defended anyway, if at least from an errant missile intended for somewhere else. In the end, as long as the hospital was successfully defended, the defense method was a success.
Criticize Israeli sources all you want, but you would be missing the point.
Correct. Thank goodness. I hope they shot down even more.
AverageJoe
Registered Member
- Status
