Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #3,781
Yes, this is Iran's fault.
We in Iran want to attack them more and we need more reasons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, this is Iran's fault.
Hypersonic warhead (not to be confuse with HGV) does pop up manuveour prior to impact
Interesting analysis from CNN.
"Iran 'clearly wanted to telegraph this': Retired colonel on how US got intel ahead of attack"
The general impression from the US military seems to be that Iran didn't want to escalate, so they telegraphed the attack so it could be defeated on purpose.
nobody plan to recycle all the missile but he mean the warhead its modular it can be separated and installed on top of a new boosterNo. You DO NOT go there. Once an ordnance failed, that belongs to EOD. Recycling failed components is a sure way to leave this world.
Interesting analysis from CNN.
"Iran 'clearly wanted to telegraph this': Retired colonel on how US got intel ahead of attack"
The general impression from the US military seems to be that Iran didn't want to escalate, so they telegraphed the attack so it could be defeated on purpose.
You can't say this in an Iranian section. Unless you're praising Iran endlessly then you're actually just "anti-Iran hater" - but more and more this looked like a controlled retaliation that Israel was aware of.It actually make a lot of sense. Why else would Iran basically give the zionist so much forewarning as to what they're about to do, including a ton of time to prepare? It's not accidental that they relayed certain aspects of their attack to Turkey lol. Everyone and their grandmothers know that loose lips sink ships and they either knew Turkey would squeal on them or they asked Turkey to rat them out. Every military uses counter-deception in whatever manner they see fit to their advantage.
And for those who say no way, Iran would never give out clues as to its intentions especially military tactics because it's not stupid to do that etc. Well, no. It's because they're smart and that was deliberate and intentional and worked to their advantage.
And for those who would think they wouldn't do so because they're not cowardly to advertise their intention so that the enemy can defend against it and then not retaliate in a drastic manner is also mistaken. That's a perfect strategy because no one wants to escalate an unfortunate event into a possible thermonuclear war! It's called being smart & cautious and minimizing the possible devastating aftermath.
Heck even the armies of ancient times followed the same line of thinking including brutal invaders like the Mongols. Most battles of old were decided pre-battle when armies would meet face to face and each would send a delegate with terms to prevent the bloodshed and more often than not, terms would be accepted and the armies would go home or be peacefully conquered. That's not cowardice or weakness or whatever. It's smart and sound strategy.
The only thing he said I don't agree with is the notion that it showed Iran's "shortcomings". That's a total contradiction to the point they were making in the first place. Why else would they telegraph their intentions and give the zionist an out in defending themselves then pound the living crap out of them? They wanted to give them a soft version of their missiles so they can defend against it. Why give them the deliberate warning then? lol
The reason they think it was an indication of a shortcoming is only because most of the drones and CMs they sent were relatively slow-traveling munitions which they think is all that Iran has. On the contrary, Iran didn't use its 'good stuff'. It has an insane amount of these drones & munitions it used that it might as well use them up and not the really good stuff. It makes all the sense in the world, just wicked stupid how some of these analyses are twisted and contradictory.
You can't say this in an Iranian section. Unless you're praising Iran endlessly then you're actually just "anti-Iran hater" - but more and more this looked like a controlled retaliation that Israel was aware of.
There is no way a serious attack at Israel would not have them retaliate. Zionists are strict on their deterrence, it's the baseline of their security policy.
Sadly this year has seen Iran's regime image take a huge hit. Many people are asking questions.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.