Setting Sail in the Eastern Mediterranean: A Comparative Analysis of Egyptian MEKO-200EN and Turkish İstif Class Frigates

Sami_1

Registered Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2023
Messages
673
Reaction score
475
Reputation
859.3
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

Setting Sail in the Eastern Mediterranean: A Comparative Analysis of Egyptian MEKO-200EN and Turkish İstif Class Frigates​



Date: Issue 127 - December 2023 Update: April 11, 2024

1713309596876.png
In the ever-changing dynamics of the Eastern Mediterranean, two prominent naval forces, Egypt and Türkiye, are concurrently enhancing their maritime capabilities through the acquisition of new frigates. However, the paths they have chosen to procure these vessels reflect distinct approaches, embodying strategic choices that extend beyond the naval domain. This article delves into a comparative analysis of the Egyptian MEKO-200EN class frigate procurement project and the Turkish Istif class frigate procurement project, examining the divergent strategies employed by these nations.


The first indigenous frigate constructed in Türkiye, TCG Istanbul is not commissioned yet, however she was the lead ship of 100 plus ship strong naval parade held on 29 October 2023 to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Turkish Republic. The Contract for the construction of the TCG Istanbul (F-515) Frigate, the lead ship of the MILGEM ISTIF-Class Frigate Project, was signed between the Defense Industry Agency (SSB) and the Main Contractor STM on April 12, 2019 and the contract into the effect on September 27, 2019.


TCG Istanbul will make the Turkish frigate force younger. The keel of the second frigate was laid on 15 November 2023 at Anadolu Shipyard. Türkiye has bought second-hand frigates from the USA and bought MEKO 200 class frigates from Germany. Half of them were constructed in Türkiye with German material help. All the know-how and expertise gained in these projects later showed themselves in the Ada class corvette and Istif class frigate projects. In the last decade the Turkish Naval Forces only commissioned major warships constructed in Turkish shipyards. With the exception of TCG Anadolu, all of them were designed in Türkiye too.


Another nation investing in their frigates is Egypt. The Egyptian naval forces are adding MEKO A-200En class frigates to their existing eclectic mix of frigates including one Fremm class, 2 Bergamini class with two option, four Perry class, two Jianghu, two Descubierta and 2 Knox class frigates. France, Italy, Spain, China and the USA have all supplied frigate sized warships to Egypt. Now Germany has joined the suppliers.


The agreement between TKMS and Egypt was signed in September 2018 for up to four MEKO A-200 frigates.


Under the terms of the contract, the first three units are being built in Germany, while construction of the fourth vessel is taking place at Alexandria Shipyard in Egypt. The contract also covers crew training.


Construction activities for the first ships started in late 2019, and Al-Aziz and second-in-class Al Qahhar were laid down in 2020 and launched in August 2021. Third-in-class Al Qadeer was laid down in 2021 and launched in April 2022.


Let us compare the two frigate procurement programs and the features of these warships.

ENS AL-AZIZ

AL AZIZ 904-İmage_2.jpg
The first ship of the class Al-Aziz was officially handed over to the Egyptian Navy in Germany in October 2022. The second ship Al-Qahhar followed on May 2023.


These frigates have a full load displacement of 3,700 tons, a length of 121 m, a beam of 16.4 m, a top speed of 28 kt, and a standard range of 7,700 n miles at 15 kt, and carry a crew complement of 110.


Their main machinery consists of one LM-2500 gas turbine, two MTU 16V 1163 TB93 diesels in CODAG configuration. The ships have two CP propellers and one waterjet in the central line.


The main offensive weapon on board of the MEKO A-200EN class frigates is the Exocet MM40 Block 3 anti-ship missiles. Each frigate will be able to carry up to 16 missiles on board.


The Exocet MM40 Block 3 is the latest generation shipborne variant within the Exocet family anti-ship missile capability, providing very long-range capability up to 200 kilometres at a very low altitude against all classes of warship, even in adverse weather conditions:


The missile has a high hit probability even against moving targets and outstanding penetration capability against enemy air defenses.


According to MBDA, the new navigation and propulsion package on Exocet MM40 Block 3 allows for the programming of 3D waypoints, optimized trajectories and simultaneous terminal attacks of multiple missiles.


The only other warship using the same missile in the Egyptian Navy is the Fremm class frigate


ENS Tahya Misr, giving these warships a common weapon.


For defense against airborne threats the ship is equipped with the MICA NG missile, which is, by MBDA, the only missile in the world equipped with two, interoperable, state-of-the-art seekers, providing superior features to counter all types of threat (cruise missiles, UAVs, aircraft, helicopters, PGMs, smart bombs, etc). The MICA NG missile has an active RF AESA seeker providing all weather shoot-up/shoot-down capability and a passive Imaging IR seeker with dual-band IR matrix for anti-flare maximum capability.


The missile is stored and vertically launched from its individual storage container, thus eliminating the need for a special vertical launcher system, providing 360° engagement coverage.


The main gun of the A-200EN class frigates is one Leonardo 127/64LW gun. Additionally, for close in defense there are two Nexter Narwhal RCWSs.


The main air and surface search radar of Al-Aziz class frigates are the NS110 radars from Thales. This is a member of the E/F-band AESA radar family. Thales is the first company to introduce a family of E/F-band AESA radars based upon the dual axis multi-beam processing, significantly increasing situational awareness to deal with newest threats in the littoral environment. According to Thales the dual axis multi-beam enables simultaneous detection of a high variety of targets in a single operational mode. Detection beams are simultaneously positioned in elevation as well as in azimuth direction. Besides providing unrivalled air and surface surveillance performance, NS110 also includes multi-function capabilities. By adding forward and backward scanning, excellent situational awareness is combined with fast-track initiation and high-quality weapon support for high priority targets.


The radar has a 280 km maximum instrumented range and 80 km for surface targets. It can track more than 1,000 air and surface tracks. The radar has 4D air surveillance and 3D surface surveillance modes as well as weapon support for active missiles and surface gun fire support.


For fire control the Al-Aziz class frigates have Thales STIR 1.2 EO Mk2 radars on board. This is the latest system for gun and missile fire control in the successful family of Thales Track radars. The superior stealth target tracking capabilities ensure optimal performance in demanding littoral environments. Dual band radar and a full EO suite provide excellent ECCM performance. High reliability and graceful degradation are achieved by the application of new technologies including solid state transmitters.


For non-radio detection the Al-Aziz class frigates have the Mirador Mk2 electro-optical observation and tracking system on board. It provides target tracking data of highly manoeuvring air and surface targets for precise fire control of weapon systems. The system has an IR camera, an HDTV zoom camera, an optional low-light near infrared camera, and an eye-safe laser range finder. The Mirador Mk2 can provide very accurate data for small and medium caliber guns and short-range missile systems’ fire control. The system is also capable of automatic target acquisition without operator intervention during autonomous sector scan or following an external target designation.


The Al-Aziz class frigates have Altesse CESM (communications electronic support measures) and COMINT (communications intelligence) solution from Thales. Altesse provides the bearing of radio transmitters and allows standoff ranges beyond other radar or EO/IR sensors according to the company. This is a passive sensor with a greater detection range than other sensors, making it a key asset for asymmetric threat detection and positioning in all

I Sınıfı_F-515_Cem Dogut(1).jpg

TCG ISTANBUL


These frigates have a full load displacement of 3,100 tons, a length of 113.2m, a beam of 14.4m, a draft 4.05m, a top speed of 29 kt, and a standard range of 6,000 n miles at 12 kt, and carry a crew complement of 125.


The main machinery of TCG Istanbul consists of one LM-2500 gas turbine, two MTU 4000 Series MTU 20V4000M93L diesels in CODAG configuration. The ships have two CP propellers. The following ships will have MAN Spain diesels as engines.


The main offensive weapons on board TCG Istanbul will be 16 Atmaca anti-ship missiles. ATMACA can be utilized in all weather conditions, and it is resistant to countermeasures with target update, re-attack and mission abort capabilities. In addition, thanks to the advanced mission planning system (3D routing), it can be effective against fixed and moving targets. Equipped with a Global Positioning System (GPS), an Inertial Measurement Unit, Barometric Altimeter and Radar Altimeter subsystems, ATMACA uses its active radar seeker to find its target with high accuracy.


With a range of over 220 km, ATMACA has an advanced and modern data link for its target update, re-attack and mission abort capabilities. The system offers the most efficient mission profile and provides operation modes of timing, firing and hitting the target.


For defense against airborne threats these frigates will be armed with Hisar-D and ESSM surface to air missiles. These missiles will be stored and launched from the National Vertical Launching System (MIDLAS).


When the project for the construction had started, it was envisaged to use the 16-cell Mk-41 VLS that was on the TCG Istanbul Frigate, and the SSB had assigned Roketsan to procure the Mk-41 VLS from the United States. On February 14, 2018, a contract was signed between the SSB and ROKETSAN for the procurement of 4 Vertical Launching Systems (VLS). However, after the acquisition of the S-400 Triumph Air Defense Missile System, the US Government imposed CAATSA sanctions on Türkiye, resulting in the non-fulfilment of the Mk-41 VLS procurement.


As a result, the decision was made to use MIDLAS, developed by Roketsan, on the ships. The 16-cell National Vertical Launching System (MIDLAS) was announced to allow the simultaneous use of both Hisar-D RF Block-II surface to air and ESSM (Evolved SeaSparrow Missile) B1 and B2 missiles. According to the Turkish Navy's planning, MIDLAS can accommodate a total of 64 (16x4) ESSM Block 2 missiles or 16 Hisar missiles or a combination of ESSM Block 2 missiles in quad-pack configuration and HISAR missiles. As MIDLAS is a national launcher, the integration of ESSM requires an umbilical port (a connection system between the launcher and the missile). Roketsan had previously initiated efforts to develop an umbilical port-like system for ESSM integration with MIDLAS.


With a diameter of less than 250 mm and the quad-pack capability afforded by its folding fins and control surfaces, each MIDLAS cell can accommodate four HISAR-D RF Block-II G/Ms. Consequently, a total of 64 Hisar-D RF Block-II G/Ms can be housed in 16 MIDLAS cells, assuming there are no weight or budget constraints. The first test firing of the Hisar-D RF Block-II was conducted in December 2022.


The main gun of TCG Istanbul is the Leonardo 76mm. The following ships will be fitted with the 76mm naval gun developed by MKE. For asymmetrical threats or for close in protection there is one Gökdeniz turret on the top of the hangar and two Aselsan 25mm Stop remote controlled weapon stations.


The main search radar on board TCG Istanbul is the CENK-S, which features a rotating antenna and employs two-axis AESA technology. The radar is currently undergoing Sea Acceptance Tests (SAT) and is expected to be delivered to the TNFC on the TCG Istanbul Frigate at the end of 2023. The S-Band CENK-S 3D AESA Search Radar, which previously featured liquid-cooling, weighs 1,700 kg and is said to include 4,000 GaN-based T/R modules. It has been stated that it will have an air/surface target detection capacity of over 1,000 and will offer double the range performance compared to the SMART-S Mk2 Radar.


TCG Istanbul is fitted with the Aselsan Ahtapot electro-optical reconnaissance, surveillance and targeting system. The system has an IR camera, one full HDTV camera, one SWIR camera, and an eye-safe laser rangefinder. The Ahtapot E/O system can illuminate targets with a laser, perform target geolocation and automatic target detection. This system was first introduced on TCG Kınalıada an Ada class frigate.


Another important non-radio detection system on board TCG Istanbul is the Piri infra-red search and track system. One notable feature of Piri is the distributed sensor architecture, ensuring full azimuth coverage of 360° by strategically placing sensor units around the ship mast. This eliminates any blocked views, a significant advantage over rotating systems. The system is capable of movement in elevation, allowing for the detection and tracking of higher-altitude threats. This feature is complemented by accurate stabilization, definable masking zones, and video recording capability.


The Passive Search and Track system can detect and track multiple targets simultaneously, thanks to staring sensors that offer a very high image update rate compared to rotating systems. This results in a shorter time for track declaration, a longer track declaration range, and extended available time for countermeasures. The simultaneous dual-band IR imaging minimizes false alarms, while the large elevation FOV enables the simultaneous detection of sea-skimming missiles and higher-altitude airborne targets.


For electronic warfare there are two different systems. For electronic counter measure (ECM) the Aselsan made AREAS-2NC is used. The system is designed for electronic attack missions on surface platforms. The system has the capability to internally generate ECM techniques, which can be applied either separately or simultaneously. It is programmable via a mission data file and can also seamlessly integrate with the combat management system.


The distinctive shape of the Aselsan ARE2N ESM system is a prominent feature of the main mast. ARES-2N is designed for intercepting, detecting, and identifying radar signals with precise parameter measurement and accurate direction finding. It characterizes advanced emitters and automatically identifies them via a mission data file. The system features a wide-band microwave receiver architecture, a high gain antenna array, and employs the amplitude comparison method for direction finding according to Aselsan.


The system also allows digital recording of intercept files, seamless integration with Combat Management Systems, blanking interface with on-board emitters, and support for ship navigation data. ARES-2N is a modern, field-proven solution catering to the evolving needs of surface platforms.


Conclusion


The two prominent navies of the Eastern Mediterranean are adding almost simultaneously new frigates to their naval forces. How they are obtaining their frigates clearly indicates the two very distinct and separate procurement paths these two navies are following.


In conclusion, the Egyptian MEKO-200EN class frigate procurement project and the Turkish Istif class frigate procurement project exemplify two distinct approaches to bolstering naval capabilities in the Eastern Mediterranean. Egypt, opting for a proven and existing commercial-off-the-shelf design, has secured frigates equipped with weapons and sensors crafted by reputable European defense contractors. Some of them like the Exocet anti-ship missile has almost a household name status and has been extensively used in combat since 1982. The familiarity of these systems provides a sense of security, assuming the nation can sustain the capital and operational expenditures required throughout the ship's service life.


However, Egypt's reliance on financial support from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia raises questions about the long-term sustainability of such projects. The continuity of Saudi largesse remains uncertain, potentially affecting the operational capabilities and maintenance of the Al-Aziz class frigates over time.


On the other hand, Türkiye has charted a more intricate path by opting to design its own frigate, tailoring it to meet specific operational needs and concepts. The decision to integrate locally made weapon and sensor systems introduces a level of complexity and risk. TCG Istanbul, as one of the first vessels to incorporate these new systems, faces the inevitable challenges associated with the teething troubles of novel designs. Unlike the off-the-shelf approach, the lack of combat experience for these brand-new systems raises valid concerns about their performance in real operations.


As both nations progress with their frigate projects, the Eastern Mediterranean naval landscape stands witness to a nuanced interplay between tradition and innovation, dependence and self-sufficiency. The success of these endeavours will be measured not only by the immediate operational capabilities of the frigates but by the long-term resilience and adaptability of each navy in the face of evolving geopolitical, technological, and financial landscapes. The Egyptian MEKO-200EN class frigate and the Turkish Istif class frigate symbolize not just naval power but also strategic foresight in navigating the complex currents of modern maritime challenges

https://www.defenceturkey.com/en/co...o-200en-and-turkish-istif-class-frigates-5812
 
2Xr24M7npVs111.jpg

Although Egypt is in the process of negotiating to obtain the Turkish ATMACA missile, the Egyptian Navy will also remain weak in its limited ammunition despite the enormous diversity of sources.

Also, Egypt’s intention to produce the Italian MARTE ER/ERP missile, even after developing its specifications and producing a copy of it against land targets as a kind of offset to the Italian deal, is not considered a good solution.
MBDA_MARTE_COASTAL_DEFENCE_SYSTEM_DIMDEX_2014_2.jpg
But Egypt remains in need of an advanced surface-to-surface missile to replace 600 Atom, Harpoon, and Exocet missiles. Of course, the Turkish missile is only a bad option, even if Turkey allows Egypt to assemble it. The Turks were able to establish a production line of 20 KTJ-3200 engines per day, which allows the production of 6,000 missiles annually of the SOM and SOM models. ATMACA, therefore, attracting Egypt as a client increases the economic viability of their products, and this is not in Egypt’s interest at all. It is assumed that we want more advanced products capable of competing and providing an appropriate deterrent to the navies of the Eastern Mediterranean, and does not provide Egypt with the appropriate capability, even with the availability of Russian and Chinese coastal defense missiles that operate with ramjet engines.
Marte-ER-ali-piegate-Simulacro-scaled.jpg
 
Last edited:
if atmaca is a bad solution then why Egypt interested in it? Go buy europian off the shelf, they will like to sell their products. Egypt is not a small country yo can get many off set too.
 
in short egypt navy is expensive mess without good prospects for upgrading unless to throw even more money, on other side turkish navy on paper might have some disadvantages but with brighter perspective and undisputed operational superiority due domesticated equipment.
 
if atmaca is a bad solution then why Egypt interested in it? Go buy europian off the shelf, they will like to sell their products. Egypt is not a small country yo can get many off set too.
main-qimg-327eb6faa534844790cf8552e8c3bb79-c.jpg
370 km (AGM-158A), 1,000 km (AGM-158B), 1,800 km (AGM-158D)

What are the trends in the anti-ship missile industry?

Ultrasonic versions have a greater escape ability than ship air defense systems. Taiwanese, Japanese, Chinese and Russian missiles illustrate this.
Missiles with a low radar signature and not an imitation of the Harpoon missile like the ATMACA
Missiles with a range exceeding 400 kilometers, while Israeli missiles have a range of 400+
Simply put, the old systems such as Exocet, Harpoon, Automat, and even ATMACA did not offer anything new
The United States itself had a proposal to develop the Harabun missile with a range of 900 kilometers
Countries that obtained a license from the Russians for the Kh-35 light missile, such as Korea KN-19 Kumsong-3, have a range exceeding 350+ kilometers and a destructive warhead of 250-300 kilograms.
You are simply not in the business of remaking the wheel. Global trends are different in systems, so why do I always resort to low-standard versions, which opens the file of these deals that are implemented?
scalp-20120712.jpg
MDCN 1400 KM
 
if atmaca is a bad solution then why Egypt interested in it? Go buy europian off the shelf, they will like to sell their products. Egypt is not a small country yo can get many off set too.
100434_seaicebreaker_248723.jpg
It may be only at a very low price or specific requests to replenish stocks. Egypt has purchased more than 130 Exocet missiles since 2014.
M5IGHOTLRVEHLIXTE3PZ3TMA64.jpg

It bought 25 automatic missiles and bought 25+ Harpoon missiles to replenish its previous stocks, especially since it is a quick solution and accelerates the transfer of technology, even if it is modest and backward. Also, it is not denied or denied, perhaps there are personal interests, as the arms trade depends mainly on corruption, and the Turks are adept at offering bribes to customers.
 
I really hope we don't sell nothing to them, let them buy like they are buying potatoes and tomatoes :ROFLMAO: weapons. Just treat them like the Western world do not give more. Comparing missiles from over the world like they would sell them weapons with ToT. They did buy billions dollar of weapons they did get nothing, germans did sell them 30 years old design subs and they are happy with it.
 
I really hope we don't sell nothing to them, let them buy like they are buying potatoes and tomatoes :ROFLMAO: weapons. Just treat them like the Western world do not give more. Comparing missiles from over the world like they would sell them weapons with ToT. They did buy billions dollar of weapons they did get nothing, germans did sell them 30 years old design subs and they are happy with it.
53571254353_6be2d6ae06_o.jpg
In principle, the Egyptian Navy represents terror and deterrence for Türkiye's dreams that have turned into illusions

It is also clear that you do not understand anything. Buying weapons in large quantities is inevitable because in times of war you will not find anyone to give you weapons. Also, Egypt has a larger navy than Turkey.
It has 20 corvette frigates and 40 missile launchers
1713537882043.png
Model of the JARI-USV-A in Cairo, Egypt. (Picture source: Navy
Recognition)


Also, the Egyptian naval units will be Manned-Unmanned Teaming teams for the naval units, such as an Egyptian cruiser who will command 2-4 UUV/USV units. This will of course make the Egyptian Navy, which will possess large numbers of USVs, in need of huge numbers of SSM missiles, thus the concept of the 1980s that Egypt possesses 700 surface-to-surface missiles for the naval and coastal defense units are no longer enough, so you find Egypt requesting every missile it can obtain, so it supported 600 Exocet, Automat, and Harpoon missiles, as well as the C-705KD missiles supplied to the Egyptian units of the MRTP-33, and Turkey offered to Egypt to produce not only the MILGEM corvette and supply it. With Egyptian ammunition, but also the MRTP-34/45/51

1713536507252.png
Next to the coastal picturesque CM-302 / P-800

The TYPE-209 submarines are modernized and have the ability to dive to a depth of 500 metres, and this is what distinguishes them from the newer versions, and you do not know what their level of modernization is in navigation or electronic warfare systems, as all European platforms are based on Turkey in their electronic access, navigation and fire management.
GKVc6YrWsAAWBgr321321321312654654654.jpg
Also, Egyptian-Turkish relations were engineered through Egyptian intelligence. Erdogan came on his knees to Egypt because Egypt offered him a temporary rescue offer and provided Gulf financial support so that he would not fall in the elections. Egypt sees Erdogan’s presence as an ideal opportunity to double Turkey and its economic collapse, and we have not mentioned it for years that Turkey is economically heading for contraction and death. This is what is happening now and is continuing, and in exchange for Erdogan’s support, he presented Egypt with offers that we said were competitive at very low prices to open the Egyptian market, which is what makes the Europeans offer technically better offers than the Turks. The Turks offered the Corvette MILGEM at a price of less than 300 million dollars, while the newer versions of the Corvette Gowind 2500 are priced. 500 million dollars
Suffren-Submarine-Cutaway.jpg
Regarding submarines, there is competition between the S-80 PLUS and the Barracuda version as the main submarine for the Egyptian Navy.
Type 209/1600, Type 039C, guard and attack submarines.

Egypt targets Reconquest and its number of submarines, which were 14 submarines in 1980.
In addition to midget submarine dives and unmanned submarines near Talat Misr, the UUV/USV was deployed, which received French, Chinese and Italian offers.

Maintaining quantitative superiority does not mean also giving up qualitative superiority, as Turkish weapons are equivalent to Chinese weapons in terms of weapons supplied in quantities.
So you find Egypt saved with 76 WING LOON 2 and 42 WING LOONG I
and CH-5 18-24
And also the national production 6 OCTOBAR,
30 JUNE / AHMOS /
And the numbers of TB2 / AKANCI combine quantity and awareness together to demonstrate absolute superiority in the theaters of operations over the countries that represent the field of hostility: Israel, Turkey, Iran, Ethiopia.
 
it is cheaper to ask your masters in tel aviv what kind of navy is suitable for you to get better deals.
 
if atmaca is a bad solution then why Egypt interested in it? Go buy europian off the shelf, they will like to sell their products. Egypt is not a small country yo can get many off set too.

I don't want to put words in Sami's mouth, but I don't think he meant the missile itself is a bad missile, just that it's not the best "option" for what he thinks the EN needs. Sometime things get lost in translation, so to speak. He said "bad option" not "solution" which are two different things.

The reasoning for it possibly being a bad option is mostly economic but there are also security concerns, being the relations between the two parties and the obvious potential enemy and if in a time of war, would that relationship be compromised. That's where I think the concern is coming from.

But overall, the EN is structured in a mostly defensive makeup. It needs a lot more offensive capabilities and it's not just the navy, it's the entire Egyptian military that needs drastic improvement in its offensive capabilities.
 
it is cheaper to ask your masters in tel aviv what kind of navy is suitable for you to get better deals.
I smell smoke in the back area of some people. Everyone knows who Israel’s slaves are and who Israel hit, but they did not dare to attack Lard. He knows that they are his face for selling Israeli weapons and technology and who has been supplying Israel with vegetables, fruits, ammunition and weapons since October 7.
 
It's fine to compare weapons but here the big defining issue is that Turkey's weapons are domestically produced, where as Egypt is spending billions on imports. Assign some of that funding to a domestic base and you will make leap frogs, sure it may take longer but it is well worth it.
 
I smell smoke in the back area of some people. Everyone knows who Israel’s slaves are and who Israel hit, but they did not dare to attack Lard. He knows that they are his face for selling Israeli weapons and technology and who has been supplying Israel with vegetables, fruits, ammunition and weapons since October 7.
It is similar situation, both states are pathetic and without any agency regarding that matter, meanwhile you behave like chickens in coop "fighting" over some worms.
 
both Turkey and MISR are under strick Masonic gang, what are you guys talking about?
 
t's fine to compare weapons but here the big defining issue is that Turkey's weapons are domestically produced,

And not just that, they had a 40-year head start lol. They were (are) very smart taking advantage of their position in NATO and especially with regards to their geographic location. That gave them a strategic advantage like none other since it was ideal for the US' and NATO's cold war motivations & ambitions against Russia. In exchange for much of that came the benefits of such an alliance in the form of a lot of assistance with its domestic technology. And not just militarily, but economically was/is monumental. But of course, it also took a lot of wherewithal on the part of the Turks to get to where they are today.

where as Egypt is spending billions on imports

It really is scary how much we've spent in just the last 10 years alone, and not just for the military but the industrialization spending is equally enormous if not more than the military. Sisi seems to be super confident that his plan will work. 🙏

Assign some of that funding to a domestic base and you will make leap frogs, sure it may take longer but it is well worth it.

We're starting to see a major effort and promising results already. From radars to electronics to UAVs to armored vehicles and there's also a lot of experience in assembling & building ships & tanks etc. We can even go back to 1960 and see that there is huge potential just lying in the waiting.

The Helwan HA-300 was an Egyptian project assisted by Willie Messersmith and a team of German & Egyptian engineers that built in Egypt by Egyptian blood. sweat & tears.

The first prototype flew on March 7, 1964. It made 135 flight test and had a remarkable problem-free testing phase reaching a top speed of Mach 1.13!. Really incredible.

1713719475123.png 1713719804151.png

It had a British engine which produced 8200 lbs. of thrust and they wanted to give it a better engine and ended up working with India and their domestic fighter at the time and came up with a joint domestic engine that produced over 10,000 lbs. of thrust. This was in the mid-1960s!

Of course this had huge implications on Egypt being that the primary designer was Willie Messersmith who was basically a former Nazi with a team of former Nazi engineers working with Egyptian engineers which was most certainly a huge factor in the zionist demon pigs criminal surprise attack in 1967, effectively terminating this tremendous project with so much potential that was beyond anyone's imagination.

So there is an enormous foundation. What stopped it was war with the demons which had a devastating impact on the country's ability to develop a military industry of its own for decades on end. But no use crying over spilt milk, there are no excuses now.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top