OldTwilight
Registered Member
Iran heat
Iran launches Operation True Promise - massive missile/drone strikes across Israel, Israel allegedly responds with quadcopters
- Thread starter Mehdipersian
- Start date
- Status
OldTwilight
Registered Member
Russians see themselves more western so , they will cooperate with Israel if they could offer them something even small
Lulldapull
Trusted Member
Iranian ECM jamming. That's why it failed.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
April 22, 2024, 12:01 a.m. ET
To understand the scope of Israel’s initial battle plans, the
reporters, working in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, spoke to Israeli
and Western officials involved in or briefed on the process.
Israel abandoned plans for a much more extensive counterstrike
on Iran after concerted diplomatic pressure from the United
States and other foreign allies and because the brunt of an
Iranian assault on Israel soil had been thwarted, according to
three senior Israeli officials.
Israeli leaders originally discussed bombarding several
military targets across Iran last week, including near Tehran,
the Iranian capital, in retaliation for the Iranian strike on
April 13, said the officials, who spoke on the discussion of
anonymity to describe the sensitive discussions.
Such a broad and damaging attack would have been far harder for
Iran to overlook, increasing the chances of a forceful Iranian
counterattack that could have brought the Middle East to the
brink of a major regional conflict.
In the end — after President Biden, along with the British and
German foreign ministers, urged Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to prevent a wider war — Israel opted for a more
limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage,
diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now.
Still, in the view of Israeli officials, the attack showed Iran
the breadth and sophistication of Israel’s military arsenal.
Instead of sending fighter jets into Iranian airspace, Israel
fired a small number of missiles from aircraft positioned
several hundred miles west of it on Friday, according to the
Israeli officials and two senior Western officials briefed on
the attack. Israel also sent small attack drones, [20]known as
quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses, according to the
Israeli officials.
www.nytimes.com
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
April 22, 2024, 12:01 a.m. ET
To understand the scope of Israel’s initial battle plans, the
reporters, working in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, spoke to Israeli
and Western officials involved in or briefed on the process.
Israel abandoned plans for a much more extensive counterstrike
on Iran after concerted diplomatic pressure from the United
States and other foreign allies and because the brunt of an
Iranian assault on Israel soil had been thwarted, according to
three senior Israeli officials.
Israeli leaders originally discussed bombarding several
military targets across Iran last week, including near Tehran,
the Iranian capital, in retaliation for the Iranian strike on
April 13, said the officials, who spoke on the discussion of
anonymity to describe the sensitive discussions.
Such a broad and damaging attack would have been far harder for
Iran to overlook, increasing the chances of a forceful Iranian
counterattack that could have brought the Middle East to the
brink of a major regional conflict.
In the end — after President Biden, along with the British and
German foreign ministers, urged Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to prevent a wider war — Israel opted for a more
limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage,
diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now.
Still, in the view of Israeli officials, the attack showed Iran
the breadth and sophistication of Israel’s military arsenal.
Instead of sending fighter jets into Iranian airspace, Israel
fired a small number of missiles from aircraft positioned
several hundred miles west of it on Friday, according to the
Israeli officials and two senior Western officials briefed on
the attack. Israel also sent small attack drones, [20]known as
quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses, according to the
Israeli officials.
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
Fake. Obvious Zionist psyops. NYT(!). This exact thing is a decades long practice.Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
April 22, 2024, 12:01 a.m. ET
To understand the scope of Israel’s initial battle plans, the
reporters, working in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, spoke to Israeli
and Western officials involved in or briefed on the process.
Israel abandoned plans for a much more extensive counterstrike
on Iran after concerted diplomatic pressure from the United
States and other foreign allies and because the brunt of an
Iranian assault on Israel soil had been thwarted, according to
three senior Israeli officials.
Israeli leaders originally discussed bombarding several
military targets across Iran last week, including near Tehran,
the Iranian capital, in retaliation for the Iranian strike on
April 13, said the officials, who spoke on the discussion of
anonymity to describe the sensitive discussions.
Such a broad and damaging attack would have been far harder for
Iran to overlook, increasing the chances of a forceful Iranian
counterattack that could have brought the Middle East to the
brink of a major regional conflict.
In the end — after President Biden, along with the British and
German foreign ministers, urged Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to prevent a wider war — Israel opted for a more
limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage,
diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now.
Still, in the view of Israeli officials, the attack showed Iran
the breadth and sophistication of Israel’s military arsenal.
Instead of sending fighter jets into Iranian airspace, Israel
fired a small number of missiles from aircraft positioned
several hundred miles west of it on Friday, according to the
Israeli officials and two senior Western officials briefed on
the attack. Israel also sent small attack drones, [20]known as
quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses, according to the
Israeli officials.
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
Seymour Hersch is an example of one of their mouthpieces with his ‘scoops’. He’s been saying for decades how Zionia wanted to attack this and that but but but.
Zionist can’t. THAT’S why they resort to terror. IRI’s issue is a security one not a military one.
UKBengali
Elite Member
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
April 22, 2024, 12:01 a.m. ET
To understand the scope of Israel’s initial battle plans, the
reporters, working in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, spoke to Israeli
and Western officials involved in or briefed on the process.
Israel abandoned plans for a much more extensive counterstrike
on Iran after concerted diplomatic pressure from the United
States and other foreign allies and because the brunt of an
Iranian assault on Israel soil had been thwarted, according to
three senior Israeli officials.
Israeli leaders originally discussed bombarding several
military targets across Iran last week, including near Tehran,
the Iranian capital, in retaliation for the Iranian strike on
April 13, said the officials, who spoke on the discussion of
anonymity to describe the sensitive discussions.
Such a broad and damaging attack would have been far harder for
Iran to overlook, increasing the chances of a forceful Iranian
counterattack that could have brought the Middle East to the
brink of a major regional conflict.
In the end — after President Biden, along with the British and
German foreign ministers, urged Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to prevent a wider war — Israel opted for a more
limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage,
diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now.
Still, in the view of Israeli officials, the attack showed Iran
the breadth and sophistication of Israel’s military arsenal.
Instead of sending fighter jets into Iranian airspace, Israel
fired a small number of missiles from aircraft positioned
several hundred miles west of it on Friday, according to the
Israeli officials and two senior Western officials briefed on
the attack. Israel also sent small attack drones, [20]known as
quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses, according to the
Israeli officials.
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
Nothing was hit and Iran probably jammed or shot down the Zionist missiles that were fired over Syria.
So much cope from the Zionist media at play here.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
(Google Translate from Arabic to English)
"The New York Times": Israel planned to launch a larger attack on Iran, but it reduced it under international pressure to avoid war.
04-22-2024 | 08:55 Source : “An-Nahar”
Days after the #Israeli strike , which was described as “accurate and limited,” on #Iran , and the ambiguity and inconsistency that prevailed in the official Iranian narrative and that issued by American and Israeli officials, the New York Times revealed , today, new data about this attack, Explaining that many Israeli plans were previously being prepared against Iran and its capital, Tehran.
The newspaper quoted three senior Israeli officials as saying that “Israel has abandoned its plans to launch a more comprehensive counterattack on Iran after coordinated diplomatic pressure from the United States and other foreign allies, and because the brunt of the Iranian attack on Israel has been thwarted.”
The officials, who requested to remain anonymous, described the discussions as “sensitive” and noted that “Israeli leaders originally discussed bombing several military targets across Iran last week, including targets near the Iranian capital, Tehran,” in response to the Iranian attack. On April 13th.
The newspaper adds, "It was very difficult for Iran to overlook such a large-scale and devastating attack, which increases the chances of launching a powerful Iranian counterattack that could have put the Middle East on the brink of a major regional conflict."
US President Joe Biden , along with the British and German Foreign Ministers, succeeded in urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to prevent a broader war, prompting Israel to launch a limited strike on Friday that avoided major damage, reducing the possibility of escalation at the same time. “Current,” according to what Israeli officials told the newspaper.
However, from the perspective of Israeli officials, the attack on Iran demonstrated the breadth and sophistication of Israel's military arsenal.
The New York Times reveals in its information that “instead of sending fighter planes into Iranian airspace, Israel fired a small number of missiles from planes stationed hundreds of miles west of it on Friday,” according to Israeli officials and two senior Western officials familiar with the attack. .
Israel also sent “small attack drones, known as quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses,” according to Israeli officials.
The officials said, "A missile hit an anti-aircraft battery in a strategically important part of central Iran, while another missile exploded in the air." An Israeli official said, “The Israeli Air Force deliberately destroyed the second missile as soon as the first missile reached its target, to avoid causing serious damage,” while a Western official said, “It is possible that the missile had malfunctioned.” The Israeli army refused to comment on this matter.
But this time was different: Within a week, Iran began sending private signals to its neighbors and foreign diplomats that its patience had reached the limit and that it would respond with a major strike on Israel in its first-ever direct attack on Israeli territory.
The American newspaper continues its information about the Israeli response to Iran, confirming that “during the week of April 8, Israel began preparing two major military responses,” according to what Israeli officials reported.
The first was a defensive operation to prevent the expected Iranian attack, in coordination with US Central Command, whose supreme commander, General Michael Corella, visited Israel that week, as well as with the British, French and Jordanian armies.
The second was a massive offensive operation that would be carried out when the Iranian strike was carried out. “Israeli intelligence initially believed that Iran planned the attack using a swarm of large drones and up to 10 ballistic missiles,” Israeli officials said. “As the week went on, that estimate rose to 60 missiles, increasing Israel’s desire to launch a powerful counterattack.” ".
According to the New York Times' Israeli account, "Israel's military and political leaders began discussing a counterstrike that could begin as soon as Iran began launching drones, even before it was known how much damage, if any, it had caused." According to one official, “the plan was presented to the Israeli Defense Cabinet by the Chief of Staff, General Herzi Halevi, and the Air Force Commander, Tomer Bar, early on Friday, April 12, two days before the Iranian attack.”
The officials said, "Israel's intentions changed after the Iranian attack. The attack was larger than expected: with more than 100 ballistic missiles, 170 drones and about 30 cruise missiles," describing the attack as "one of the largest attacks of this kind in military history." ".
But the Israeli defense, which was coordinated with pilots from the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan, shot down most of the missiles and drones, and only limited damage was caused on the ground, reducing the need for a quick response. Two officials said there were questions about whether Israel should risk shifting its focus away from defense during the attack.
However, an early morning phone call between Netanyahu and Biden marked a turning point, during which the US president encouraged Israel to treat “a successful defense as a victory that requires no further response,” according to three Israelis. The Israelis said that Netanyahu left the call “opposed to immediate retaliation.”
After Israel carried out its attack early Friday morning, officials in Tehran largely avoided blaming Israel for the attack. This, along with Israel's decision not to claim responsibility, helped reduce the risk of escalation.
www.annahar.com
"The New York Times": Israel planned to launch a larger attack on Iran, but it reduced it under international pressure to avoid war.
04-22-2024 | 08:55 Source : “An-Nahar”
Days after the #Israeli strike , which was described as “accurate and limited,” on #Iran , and the ambiguity and inconsistency that prevailed in the official Iranian narrative and that issued by American and Israeli officials, the New York Times revealed , today, new data about this attack, Explaining that many Israeli plans were previously being prepared against Iran and its capital, Tehran.
The newspaper quoted three senior Israeli officials as saying that “Israel has abandoned its plans to launch a more comprehensive counterattack on Iran after coordinated diplomatic pressure from the United States and other foreign allies, and because the brunt of the Iranian attack on Israel has been thwarted.”
The officials, who requested to remain anonymous, described the discussions as “sensitive” and noted that “Israeli leaders originally discussed bombing several military targets across Iran last week, including targets near the Iranian capital, Tehran,” in response to the Iranian attack. On April 13th.
The newspaper adds, "It was very difficult for Iran to overlook such a large-scale and devastating attack, which increases the chances of launching a powerful Iranian counterattack that could have put the Middle East on the brink of a major regional conflict."
US President Joe Biden , along with the British and German Foreign Ministers, succeeded in urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to prevent a broader war, prompting Israel to launch a limited strike on Friday that avoided major damage, reducing the possibility of escalation at the same time. “Current,” according to what Israeli officials told the newspaper.
However, from the perspective of Israeli officials, the attack on Iran demonstrated the breadth and sophistication of Israel's military arsenal.
The New York Times reveals in its information that “instead of sending fighter planes into Iranian airspace, Israel fired a small number of missiles from planes stationed hundreds of miles west of it on Friday,” according to Israeli officials and two senior Western officials familiar with the attack. .
Israel also sent “small attack drones, known as quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses,” according to Israeli officials.
The officials said, "A missile hit an anti-aircraft battery in a strategically important part of central Iran, while another missile exploded in the air." An Israeli official said, “The Israeli Air Force deliberately destroyed the second missile as soon as the first missile reached its target, to avoid causing serious damage,” while a Western official said, “It is possible that the missile had malfunctioned.” The Israeli army refused to comment on this matter.
But this time was different: Within a week, Iran began sending private signals to its neighbors and foreign diplomats that its patience had reached the limit and that it would respond with a major strike on Israel in its first-ever direct attack on Israeli territory.
The American newspaper continues its information about the Israeli response to Iran, confirming that “during the week of April 8, Israel began preparing two major military responses,” according to what Israeli officials reported.
The first was a defensive operation to prevent the expected Iranian attack, in coordination with US Central Command, whose supreme commander, General Michael Corella, visited Israel that week, as well as with the British, French and Jordanian armies.
The second was a massive offensive operation that would be carried out when the Iranian strike was carried out. “Israeli intelligence initially believed that Iran planned the attack using a swarm of large drones and up to 10 ballistic missiles,” Israeli officials said. “As the week went on, that estimate rose to 60 missiles, increasing Israel’s desire to launch a powerful counterattack.” ".
According to the New York Times' Israeli account, "Israel's military and political leaders began discussing a counterstrike that could begin as soon as Iran began launching drones, even before it was known how much damage, if any, it had caused." According to one official, “the plan was presented to the Israeli Defense Cabinet by the Chief of Staff, General Herzi Halevi, and the Air Force Commander, Tomer Bar, early on Friday, April 12, two days before the Iranian attack.”
The officials said, "Israel's intentions changed after the Iranian attack. The attack was larger than expected: with more than 100 ballistic missiles, 170 drones and about 30 cruise missiles," describing the attack as "one of the largest attacks of this kind in military history." ".
But the Israeli defense, which was coordinated with pilots from the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan, shot down most of the missiles and drones, and only limited damage was caused on the ground, reducing the need for a quick response. Two officials said there were questions about whether Israel should risk shifting its focus away from defense during the attack.
However, an early morning phone call between Netanyahu and Biden marked a turning point, during which the US president encouraged Israel to treat “a successful defense as a victory that requires no further response,” according to three Israelis. The Israelis said that Netanyahu left the call “opposed to immediate retaliation.”
After Israel carried out its attack early Friday morning, officials in Tehran largely avoided blaming Israel for the attack. This, along with Israel's decision not to claim responsibility, helped reduce the risk of escalation.
'نيويورك تايمز': إسرائيل خطّطت لشنّ هجوم أكبر على إيران لكنّها قلّصته بضغوط دوليّة لتجنّب الحرب
تابع آخر الأخبار والتحليلات الشاملة والموثوقة في الشرق الأوسط مع جريدة النهار. اطّلع على آخر الأحداث السياسية والاقتصادية والثقافية والرياضية وغيرها. تابع مقالات كتّابنا المميزين واستمتع بتجربة قراءة فريدة ومتميزة.
www.annahar.com
BHAN85
Trusted Member
Even if all impacted, it would be clearly a much more smaller response than the original Iran attack against Israel.
3 Israeli missiles vs 300 Iranian missiles and drones
UKBengali
Elite Member
Dude, there is zero evidence supplied of a single impact.
Zionists are jerking off over something that never happened. Pathetic.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
There are two possibilities: that is true or that is false.
In both cases, a bigger response will be ask in some moment in Israel.
So no matter if something was hit or not.
Question now is when will happen the real/big response.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #6,042
It's Pure propagandaIsrael Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
April 22, 2024, 12:01 a.m. ET
To understand the scope of Israel’s initial battle plans, the
reporters, working in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, spoke to Israeli
and Western officials involved in or briefed on the process.
Israel abandoned plans for a much more extensive counterstrike
on Iran after concerted diplomatic pressure from the United
States and other foreign allies and because the brunt of an
Iranian assault on Israel soil had been thwarted, according to
three senior Israeli officials.
Israeli leaders originally discussed bombarding several
military targets across Iran last week, including near Tehran,
the Iranian capital, in retaliation for the Iranian strike on
April 13, said the officials, who spoke on the discussion of
anonymity to describe the sensitive discussions.
Such a broad and damaging attack would have been far harder for
Iran to overlook, increasing the chances of a forceful Iranian
counterattack that could have brought the Middle East to the
brink of a major regional conflict.
In the end — after President Biden, along with the British and
German foreign ministers, urged Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to prevent a wider war — Israel opted for a more
limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage,
diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now.
Still, in the view of Israeli officials, the attack showed Iran
the breadth and sophistication of Israel’s military arsenal.
Instead of sending fighter jets into Iranian airspace, Israel
fired a small number of missiles from aircraft positioned
several hundred miles west of it on Friday, according to the
Israeli officials and two senior Western officials briefed on
the attack. Israel also sent small attack drones, [20]known as
quadcopters, to confuse Iranian air defenses, according to the
Israeli officials.
Israel Planned Bigger Attack on Iran, but Scaled It Back to Avoid War
The strike on Iran on Friday was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after intense pressure from allies, Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet it down.
Yes, we now believe that Israel is strong and not afraid of Iran.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
Even if that news would be true, it means Israel response was very weak.
And the news didnt say Israel was not afraid, it says the opposite.
The news says sum up: Israel planned a big attack, but they executed a small attack because they were afraid of escalation.
"Israel opted for a more limited strike on Friday that avoided significant damage, diminishing the likelihood of an escalation, at least for now."
Last edited:
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #6,045
All western media is controlled by Jews.
We have so many videos of missiles hitting Israel, but they easily announce that 99% have been intercepted!
They attack Iran with 3 quadcopters and missiles, but the missiles go wrong and probably the quadcopters couldn't do anything, then they magnify this funny answer in their media.
- Status
