BHAN85
Trusted Member
You are seeing it with a Iranian view.
In a Western view, to be perceived as strong, it's a bad thing.
Here the weak are the good, the victim to concern about.
Iran launches Operation True Promise - massive missile/drone strikes across Israel, Israel allegedly responds with quadcopters
- Thread starter Mehdipersian
- Start date
- Status
You are seeing it with a Iranian view.
In a Western view, to be perceived as strong, it's a bad thing.
Here the weak are the good, the victim to concern about.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #6,047
The issue of Israel is different.
If they announce the real news, the Jews will get scared and go back to their real countries. That's why they lie in their media
UKBengali
Elite Member
Either there was a failure of the missiles or Iran jammed them with ECM.
I would think that if they got shot down then Iran would have announced it, probably with video footage as well if possible.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
Israel people are the poor among world Jewish people, they can't choose, most of them would wish live in USA, but they can't.
TallGuy
Registered Member
Definitely failure of missiles.
Rampage has the range of 200km if we geolocate the location where these are found. we can clearly understand that it was not even nearby. i think launch profile were developed at high angle to extract extra range up to 600km but unfortunately, they couldn`t and experiment failed. if you note the missiles are not dropped, they were fired as per ASAT launched profile, but missiles did not perform thus failed.
925boy
Elite Member
Israelis or Iranians?Israelis made a point it seems.
So which point did the Israelis make?
omegalamba7xl9
Registered Member
Let's not listen and read panjeet POV I would Rather trust below opinion over some panjeet or Gypsy......
Immortals
Elite Member
Rampage is endo-atmospheric missile it’s the cousin to the HIMARS rocket. So no it wasn’t launched at a “ASAT launch profile”.
Again it was likely Sparrow that was used since that has both the range and multiple different launch trajectories (including high apogee launch) plus a detachable warhead.
ParthianLord
Registered Member
yea as we all know
the israeli "Counter attack" did 0 damage anywhere, all just nonesense lies.
they tried to claim "but there was atleast a small damage to a radar" even that was a lie lol
total failure....
the israeli "Counter attack" did 0 damage anywhere, all just nonesense lies.
they tried to claim "but there was atleast a small damage to a radar" even that was a lie lol
total failure....
BHAN85
Trusted Member
Rats leave the ship before Iran escalation.
Wise rats.
Vikramaditya1
Trusted Member
That they can target a Radar station. This wasn't even a major strike. I wouldn't take this passively.
Immortals
Elite Member
This is the dumbest piece of analysis I have ever seen.
You don’t use a camo net in a fixed static position. And you don’t have your most strategic system (S-300) “off” when a enemy country is about to attack you.
Camo nets are for front line systems not systems sitting deep within own territory on an airbase in a static layout that can be seen from LEO. And I haven’t ever seen a photo of a S-300 radar in “ON” positon with camo all over it. The radar itself needs to be clear of anything that could cause the radar waves to “bounce” back. Do people realize how radar works?
Now if someone said Iran put up anti-drone nets at a short distance from the radar because they picked up Intel that Israel might try to use quadcopters on its defense systems, then someone might say that’s a plausible theory. But a camo net? Highly unlikely.
If we wait a few days 30CM satellite photos will be released and then this issue can be put to bed. I’m not saying 100% Israel hit the radar, I’m saying Iran’s behavior after the attack gives reason to suspect they are hiding the ramifications of the attack.
To this day, Iran still hasn’t said how many missiles/drones/CMs it fired at Israel nor has it confirmed that Israel fired missiles at Iran in retaliation.
And lastly, no one is talking about it Tabriz drone attacks, what were they targeting? What did they hit or not hit? All talk is on Isfahan.
tsunset
The Legend
I wouldn't also take passively the fact that the most protected assets on earth got struck by 1990-2000s era ballistic missiles and responding by calling someone inside Iran to launch quadcopters in hope it hits something to then jerk off to a satellite image and calling it a day
- Status
