Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

[ParthianLord]

Care to share your "highly reliable" source?

self destructed after detection lmao..... he is bullshitting, a story he and his fellow ranandeh snapp driver friends came up with hoping his 2 goldcoins raise 50 hezar toman in worth.

guys stop flaming this threads with S300 radar nonesense, all threads are spammed by Goldcoin boy and his fellow desperates with stories related to that shit.

its such tiny incident that never even happened, unbelivable guys stop posting about it nonestop.

official story and all evidence = its fake. end of story.

 

[tsunset]

You guys are hitting your own heads on rock for FPV drones, even if it hit the radar, i wouldn't care at all, get it back to repairs, they called someone inside Ispahan to do this, learn from it and install appropriated defenses for FPV drone launched by Israeli proxies

Meanwhile at least 9 500-700kg warhead struck the most protected assets on earth inside Israel

They have to get something to face up, Israelis should know this is not 1963 or 1990s anymore

 

[tsunset]

This is the typical Israeli hasbara of "we made something big Iran will know the message, out F-35 made them know we can hit their nuclear facilities with ease with our secret weapons"

Meanwhile Iran announces it can build a device in a week, but the mighty Israelis that are meant to save the world from bad Iran are doing nothing

I am also sure they will do nothing if a device is constructed and tested

True Promise shown that Iran is an existential threat to Israel only with conventional means, while Israel is not an existential threat to Iran conventionally

 

[Immortals]

Well, Two days ago one of the Iranian sources that i consider highly reliable said that the radar was targeted by FPV quadcopters and it suffered some damage to it's panel.
The same source said that the Sparrow missiles self- destructed before entering Iranian air-space, After Iranian AD systems from Tabriz, Abdanan, And another unspecified city locked on them because Israel feared that the second staged of the operation True Promise might be initiated.

I’ll already brought up the possibility that the reason sparrow boosters were found in Iraq was due to F-15’s being locked on and jettisoning payload early to flee.

Not sure if sparrows have a self destruct feature, I assume all missiles in this day and age do, including Iranian BMs, for safety reasons to prevent threat to civilian areas in case missile is deemed to be experiencing anomalies. We see this in the space industry (SpaceX and others).

But self destructing because the missiles were locked on or Israel thought Iran would launch a counter strike seems highly unlikely

You guys are hitting your own heads on rock for FPV drones, even if it hit the radar, i wouldn't care at all,

Well YOU shouldn’t care. But Iran should care that a $300 drone off the shelf [allegedly] smacked into the radar of its strategic air defense system. Investigations needs to be done and better SHORADs and anti micro drone tech placed to prevent this. No excuse for micro drones to be able to get even close to S-300 or Isafhan military airbase.

 

[Kyussis]

Well YOU shouldn’t care. But Iran should care that a $300 drone off the shelf [allegedly] smacked into the radar of its strategic air defense system. Investigations needs to be done and better SHORADs and anti micro drone tech placed to prevent this. No excuse for micro drones to be able to get even close to S-300 or Isafhan military airbase.

Have you seen any evidence as of yet that a micro drone had come anywhere near the S-300 site?

 

[tsunset]

From what they said 3 fpv were shot down with guns in Ispahan

Also where did Tabriz got hit?

 

[Flotilla]

Have you seen any evidence as of yet that a micro drone had come anywhere near the S-300 site?

You must put yourself in the worst scenario and prevent ALL threats. And we must be realistic and think that some minor damage has been caused by the enemy. It is healthy and helps in further actions. Anyway Iran has a LOT of experience in long range sensors so that damage if it´s done, can be easily repaired.

More important to the question about "if it is true" it is the statement "never again".

 

[Immortals]

Have you seen any evidence as of yet that a micro drone had come anywhere near the S-300 site?

The only evidence is the soil quality has changed (from pre strike images). But the issue is every satellite image is taken with different lighting, sun in different position in sky, cloud cover different, etc. so it’s hard to tell if that is just how the soil looks in different lighting.

What we do know is no missile hit the area and the system is still intact. Any quadcopter was likely carrying a very small explosive device (maybe a grenade or a rpg warhead). Thus without 15/30cm resolution photo we cant make any conclusions.

As it stands now neither side (pro Iran or pro Israel) has provided compelling evidence. Iranian side said it was Camo net. That was a lie. Israeli side system was split in half, that was a lie.

I’m just going to wait for more images or actual non-bias source that has experience with satellite imagery to talk on the matter.

My opinion: imagery is inconclusive

 

[jauk]

I’ll already brought up the possibility that the reason sparrow boosters were found in Iraq was due to F-15’s being locked on and jettisoning payload early to flee.

Not sure if sparrows have a self destruct feature, I assume all missiles in this day and age do, including Iranian BMs, for safety reasons to prevent threat to civilian areas in case missile is deemed to be experiencing anomalies. We see this in the space industry (SpaceX and others).

But self destructing because the missiles were locked on or Israel thought Iran would launch a counter strike seems highly unlikely



Well YOU shouldn’t care. But Iran should care that a $300 drone off the shelf [allegedly] smacked into the radar of its strategic air defense system. Investigations needs to be done and better SHORADs and anti micro drone tech placed to prevent this. No excuse for micro drones to be able to get even close to S-300 or Isafhan military airbase.

Correct. Iran should care. But not anywhere near caring the successful strike on Zionia. You projecting equivalence which you don’t seem to get.

Can you post at least half as much on the Iranian strike before posting anything else on some fictional FPVs and a bunch of‘just wait and sees’?

That’s quite a few posts.

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[tsunset]

Correct. Iran should care. But not anywhere near caring the successful strike on Zionia. You projecting equivalence which you don’t seem to get.

Can you post at least half as much on the Iranian strike before posting anything else on some fictional FPVs and a bunch of‘just wait and sees’?

That’s quite a few posts.

Why couldn't it be black gravel or some kind of marking?

 

[jauk]

Why couldn't it be black gravel or some kind of marking?

You could but then you’d be chasing shadows.

 

[Immortals]

Correct. Iran should care. But not anywhere near caring the successful strike on Zionia.

The only thing successful about the strike is that Iran finally mustered enough courage to attack the Israeli homeland. Something it hasn’t done since the creation of the Republic and finally respected a redline. That in itself is worth more than anything that was hit.

But even Saddam fired SCUDs at Israel during PG Gulf War I, so the firing of missiles at Israel is largely a symbolic message. What was important is that Iran actually went thru with it.

Can you post at least half as much on the Iranian strike

There is nothing to post about as in this case we also suffer from a lack of imagery and Intel similar to Iranian case.

If Iran fired 110 missiles [doubtful] and 200 drones [doubtful] and 30 cruise missiles [plausible] and only 10 missiles struck then Iran needs to spend more time on warhead evasion. Just like it spend over 10 years working on improving accuracy then it needs to spend even more time on building missiles with evasion capabilities. That means more K-1, K-2, Fattah 1 and Fattah-2 missiles and less Qiam and Ghadr.

This whole situation (Iran’s attack and Israel’s response) should provide Iran with enough data to make strategic changes and improvements to its military strategy and capability.

Or else neither attack (Israel or Iran) did any significant game changing damage to either party. And I predicted that the Iranian response would not have as they were not trying to start a war.

 

[jauk]

The only thing successful about the strike is that Iran finally mustered enough courage to attack the Israeli homeland. Something it hasn’t done since the creation of the Republic and finally respected a redline. That in itself is worth more than anything that was hit.

But even Saddam fired SCUDs at Israel during PG Gulf War I, so the firing of missiles at Israel is largely a symbolic message. What was important is that Iran actually went thru with it.



There is nothing to post about as in this case we also suffer from a lack of imagery and Intel similar to Iranian case.

If Iran fired 110 missiles [doubtful] and 200 drones [doubtful] and 30 cruise missiles [plausible] and only 10 missiles struck then Iran needs to spend more time on warhead evasion. Just like it spend over 10 years working on improving accuracy then it needs to spend even more time on building missiles with evasion capabilities. That means more K-1, K-2, Fattah 1 and Fattah-2 missiles and less Qiam and Ghadr.

This whole situation (Iran’s attack and Israel’s response) should provide Iran with enough data to make strategic changes and improvements to its military strategy and capability.

Or else neither attack (Israel or Iran) did any significant game changing damage to either party. And I predicted that the Iranian response would not have as they were not trying to start a war.

So Iran's strike is 'unverifiable' (incorrect of course) and you have nothing to talk about and the Isfahan quadcopter incident--'unverifiable' (again incorrect)--yet you have posted 10s of times chasing shadows and 'just wait and sees'. Am i missing something or are you stuck in a contradiction and choose to dig in for some reason?

 

[jauk]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies