Iran launches Operation True Promise - massive missile/drone strikes across Israel, Israel allegedly responds with quadcopters

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is his last interview, main points:he gave to Israel more than any potus, Bibi doesn’t respect that enough, israel set up him as only responsible for killing of iranian general in Baghdad, although Bibi also is behind that terror attack, he put Iran in hard position but Israel did not take that advantage to deal with Iran on their terms...of course, he is unstable with no moral, but i think he know that such war would have unforseen consequences...iran can be defeated only with strategic nuclear weapons, but that immediately means that russians will finish all their ongoing conflicts with their arsenal, China will have to present own readiness to cope in new circumstances...


That will not happen, but what is the biggest issue of Iran for the next period is fact that, unfortunately, their archenemy is most organized and notorious terroristic organization on the planet, Mossad/IDF...I mean nothing new, their biggest blows to Iran are classical terroristic attacks, they controls countless of notorious anti-persian terrorists of sadam hussein mental type...that will be by far biggest challenge for Iran defense sector...


Here is the last interview of Trump on this subject ...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

But as they say in the video, Trump feels behold to donors but also does like to be seen as insulted. He will deal with Bibi, but will probably try to balance it out. How much or how little he does in regards to the later depend on how Iran presents itself when Trump is inaugurated.

Perhaps we might get Iran talking of strategic ambiguity as well. Only doing cold tests of a tested design, and strongly hinting that it has the capability but never coming out a saying it.
 
from earlier lie claims of "most got shot down"

quickly changed in to "blame americans"

GMmc1LhXMAA4hMv


Israel says its going to get rid of all its American made anti ballistic and cruise missile defense systems because "They failed badly against iranian missiles"

they were stationed around their air bases that got hit. ( leaving out though in those reports that also arrow systems were stationed there and they failed too, putting the entire blame on US made systems )



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
from earlier lie claims of "most got shot down"

quickly changed in to "blame americans"

GMmc1LhXMAA4hMv


Israel says its going to get rid of all its American made anti ballistic and cruise missile defense systems because "They failed badly against iranian missiles"

they were stationed around their air bases that got hit. ( leaving out though in those reports that also arrow systems were stationed there and they failed too, putting the entire blame on US made systems )



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

its all come to Israeli soldiers, don't knew how to use them , they can go and learn how Ukrainian manage to hit 101.46% of Russian projectiles with those system , I'm sure mr. Zelensky himself volunteer to teach them how to use those systems
 
from earlier lie claims of "most got shot down"

quickly changed in to "blame americans"

GMmc1LhXMAA4hMv

If this is true, then who fired the other 100 interceptors to bring down the other “hundreds” of Iranian missiles?

Still waiting for evidence of these magical disappearing missiles!:unsure:
Israel says its going to get rid of all its American made anti ballistic and cruise missile defense systems because "They failed badly against iranian missiles"

This is not true, Patriot retirement has long been coming in advance. Israel has the older PAC-2 batteries and David Sling is more formidable and manuervable endoatmsopehric than the old patriot interceptors especially at high G force maneuvering to catch a warhead.

Better probability of interception.

they were stationed around their air bases that got hit. ( leaving out though in those reports that also arrow systems were stationed there and they failed too, putting the entire blame on US made systems )

PAC-2 would simply not be competitive against Keibar Shekan or a Qiam with a sub munition warhead.

It’s better for these Qiam/Emad/Ghadr to be intercepted in space during flight phase than on the way down when warhead has separated.
 
This is not true, Patriot retirement has long been coming in advance. Israel has the older PAC-2 batteries and David Sling is more formidable and manuervable endoatmsopehric than the old patriot interceptors especially at high G force maneuvering to catch a warhead.

Better probability of interception.



David Sling can only intercept missiles with a maximum range of 300km.
 
David Sling can only intercept missiles with a maximum range of 300km.

Who told you this? It’s within not with.

That’s maximum intercept range

The David’s Sling Missile System is equipped with EL/M-2084 multi-mission radar capable of detecting and tracking targets at ranges of up to 250-300 Km. It possesses the capability to intercept ballistic and cruise missiles within a range of 40 to 300 kilometers with a speed of 7.5 Mach.

it’s a medium-long range defense system at 250-300KM is standard and very good. Comparable to Patriot and even S-300.
 
Who told you this? It’s within not with.

That’s maximum intercept range

The David’s Sling Missile System is equipped with EL/M-2084 multi-mission radar capable of detecting and tracking targets at ranges of up to 250-300 Km. It possesses the capability to intercept ballistic and cruise missiles within a range of 40 to 300 kilometers with a speed of 7.5 Mach.

it’s a medium-long range defense system at 250-300KM is standard and very good. Comparable to Patriot and even S-300.


My bad and the article I read had bad wording.

Thought it looked wrong anyway.
 
My bad and the article I read had bad wording.

Thought it looked wrong anyway.

Its all good. Happens all the time, these journalists who write these articles typically have no engineering or weapons development background. Iranian media is also infamous for this and will sometimes put a picture of a completely different weapon system!
 

Sejil 2 was not used that’s a mostly silo based asset. Kheibar Shekan still disputed.

Iran has only confirmed Ghadr/Emad (I believe could be wrong)

Also zero proof that “more than 300 missiles and drones” were launched.

Israeli media just admitted US only fired 8 interceptors and only 2 of them hit missiles. That means Israel fired the rest? 75+ interceptors? Impossible
 
This is his last interview, main points:he gave to Israel more than any potus, Bibi doesn’t respect that enough, israel set up him as only responsible for killing of iranian general in Baghdad, although Bibi also is behind that terror attack, he put Iran in hard position but Israel did not take that advantage to deal with Iran on their terms...of course, he is unstable with no moral, but i think he know that such war would have unforseen consequences...iran can be defeated only with strategic nuclear weapons, but that immediately means that russians will finish all their ongoing conflicts with their arsenal, China will have to present own readiness to cope in new circumstances...


That will not happen, but what is the biggest issue of Iran for the next period is fact that, unfortunately, their archenemy is most organized and notorious terroristic organization on the planet, Mossad/IDF...I mean nothing new, their biggest blows to Iran are classical terroristic attacks, they controls countless of notorious anti-persian terrorists of sadam hussein mental type...that will be by far biggest challenge for Iran defense sector...


Here is the last interview of Trump on this subject ...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This is not the correct thread for this. Please transfer to the chill thread.
 
from earlier lie claims of "most got shot down"

quickly changed in to "blame americans"

GMmc1LhXMAA4hMv


Israel says its going to get rid of all its American made anti ballistic and cruise missile defense systems because "They failed badly against iranian missiles"

they were stationed around their air bases that got hit. ( leaving out though in those reports that also arrow systems were stationed there and they failed too, putting the entire blame on US made systems )



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

An American raptor must be ashamed of his bold and blatant claims of 99.9% interceptions before. Slowly the truth is coming out.
 

Only 25% of US interceptors succeeded in Iran attack - report​


Only two out of eight US interceptors succeeded in hitting Iranian missiles during the drone and missile attack that targeted Israel in mid-April, Army Radio reported on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, over 90% of Israeli interceptors hit their targets, according to the report.

--

Have to take this with a pinch of salt given Israel is probably including the interception of drones/LACMs whilst the US likely only attempted to intercept ballistic missiles. That said, 2/8 interception success rate is horrible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top